Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the ethical and legal implications of the involvement of medical practitioners in workplace screening for drug misuse. CONCLUSIONS: Workplace screening for drugs of abuse raises many ethical issues. If screening is considered as being part of medical practice with the involvement of occupational health physicians, as suggested by the Faculty of Occupational Medicine, then the ethical requirements of a normal medical consultation are fully applicable. The employee's full and informed consent to the process must be obtained and the employee should have an unfettered right of access to all the relevant records and to the urine sample he/she has provided in the event that he/she wishes to challenge the opinion expressed by the physician. If the process is not part of medical practice then employees should have the same rights as they would have if required to provide intimate body samples in the course of a criminal investigation, given the potentially serious consequences of an erroneous positive finding for their livelihood.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Brahams Diana. Bailment and donation of parts of the human body. New Law J. 1989 Jun 9;139(6411):803–804. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cone E. J., Welch P., Mitchell J. M., Paul B. D. Forensic drug testing for opiates: I. Detection of 6-acetylmorphine in urine as an indicator of recent heroin exposure; drug and assay considerations and detection times. J Anal Toxicol. 1991 Jan-Feb;15(1):1–7. doi: 10.1093/jat/15.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCutcheon J. R., Wood P. G. Snack crackers yield opiate-positive urine. Clin Chem. 1995 May;41(5):769–770. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan J., Zwerling C., Jones M. The effectiveness of preemployment drug screening in the prediction of employment outcome. J Occup Med. 1992 Nov;34(11):1057–1063. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199211000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]