Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1998 Jul;63(1):252–258. doi: 10.1086/301928

Inflation of sibling recurrence-risk ratio, due to ascertainment bias and/or overreporting.

S W Guo 1
PMCID: PMC1377249  PMID: 9634526

Abstract

One widely used measure of familial aggregation is the sibling recurrence-risk ratio, which is defined as the ratio of risk of disease manifestation, given that one's sibling is affected, as compared with the disease prevalence in the general population. Known as lambdaS, it has been used extensively in the mapping of complex diseases. In this paper, I show that, for a fictitious disease that is strictly nongenetic and nonenvironmental, lambdaS can be dramatically inflated because of misunderstanding of the original definition of lambdaS, ascertainment bias, and overreporting. Therefore, for a disease of entirely environmental origin, the lambdaS inflation due to ascertainment bias and/or overreporting is expected to be more prominent if the risk factor also is familially aggregated. This suggests that, like segregation analysis, the estimation of lambdaS also is prone to ascertainment bias and should be performed with great care. This is particularly important if one uses lambdaS for exclusion mapping, for discrimination between different genetic models, and for association studies, since these practices hinge tightly on an accurate estimation of lambdaS.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (271.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BAILEY N. T. J. The estimation of the frequencies of recessives with incomplete multiple selection. Ann Eugen. 1951 Dec;16(3):215–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1951.tb02473.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey J. M., Benishay D. S. Familial aggregation of female sexual orientation. Am J Psychiatry. 1993 Feb;150(2):272–277. doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.2.272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. ENTERLINE P. E., CAPT K. G. A validation of information provided by household respondents in health surveys. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1959 Feb;49(2):205–212. doi: 10.2105/ajph.49.2.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Farrall M., Holder S. Familial recurrence-pattern analysis of cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Feb;50(2):270–277. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Floderus B., Barlow L., Mack T. M. Recall bias in subjective reports of familial cancer. Epidemiology. 1990 Jul;1(4):318–321. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199007000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HAENSZEL W. Some problems in the estimation of familial risks of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Sep;23:487–505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hastrup J. L., Hotchkiss A. P., Johnson C. A. Accuracy of knowledge of family history of cardiovascular disorders. Health Psychol. 1985;4(4):291–306. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.4.4.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Herrmann N. Retrospective information from questionnaires. I. Comparability of primary respondents and their next-of-kin. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Jun;121(6):937–947. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hunt S. C., Williams R. R., Barlow G. K. A comparison of positive family history definitions for defining risk of future disease. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(10):809–821. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90083-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kee F., Tiret L., Robo J. Y., Nicaud V., McCrum E., Evans A., Cambien F. Reliability of reported family history of myocardial infarction. BMJ. 1993 Dec 11;307(6918):1528–1530. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6918.1528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Khoury M. J., Beaty T. H., Liang K. Y. Can familial aggregation of disease be explained by familial aggregation of environmental risk factors? Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Mar;127(3):674–683. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kruglyak L., Lander E. S. Complete multipoint sib-pair analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Aug;57(2):439–454. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Monroe K. R., Yu M. C., Kolonel L. N., Coetzee G. A., Wilkens L. R., Ross R. K., Henderson B. E. Evidence of an X-linked or recessive genetic component to prostate cancer risk. Nat Med. 1995 Aug;1(8):827–829. doi: 10.1038/nm0895-827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Narod S. A., Dupont A., Cusan L., Diamond P., Gomez J. L., Suburu R., Labrie F. The impact of family history on early detection of prostate cancer. Nat Med. 1995 Feb;1(2):99–101. doi: 10.1038/nm0295-99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. PENROSE L. S. The genetical background of common diseases. Acta Genet Stat Med. 1953;4(2-3):257–265. doi: 10.1159/000150748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pillard R. C., Weinrich J. D. Evidence of familial nature of male homosexuality. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 Aug;43(8):808–812. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800080094012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Raphael K. Recall bias: a proposal for assessment and control. Int J Epidemiol. 1987 Jun;16(2):167–170. doi: 10.1093/ije/16.2.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rich S. S. Mapping genes in diabetes. Genetic epidemiological perspective. Diabetes. 1990 Nov;39(11):1315–1319. doi: 10.2337/diab.39.11.1315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Risch N. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. I. Multilocus models. Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Feb;46(2):222–228. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Risch N. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs. Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Feb;46(2):229–241. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Risch N. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. III. The effect of marker polymorphism on analysis of affected relative pairs. Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Feb;46(2):242–253. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Risch N., Merikangas K. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science. 1996 Sep 13;273(5281):1516–1517. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5281.1516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sadovnick A. D. Genetic epidemiology of multiple sclerosis: a survey. Ann Neurol. 1994 Dec;36 (Suppl 2):S194–S203. doi: 10.1002/ana.410360806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schull W. J., Cobb S. The intrafamilial transmission of rheumatoid arthritis. 3. The lack of support for a genetic hypothesis. J Chronic Dis. 1969 Sep;22(4):217–222. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(69)90015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Whittemore A. S., Wu A. H., Kolonel L. N., John E. M., Gallagher R. P., Howe G. R., West D. W., Teh C. Z., Stamey T. Family history and prostate cancer risk in black, white, and Asian men in the United States and Canada. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Apr 15;141(8):732–740. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES