Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 1997 Aug;23(4):226–232. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.4.226

Partial and impartial ethical reasoning in health care professionals.

H Kuhse 1, P Singer 1, M Rickard 1, L Cannold 1, J van Dyk 1
PMCID: PMC1377271  PMID: 9279744

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between ethical reasoning and gender and occupation among a group of male and female nurses and doctors. DESIGN: Partialist and impartialist forms of ethical reasoning were defined and singled out as being central to the difference between what is known as the "care" moral orientation (Gilligan) and the "justice" orientation (Kohlberg). A structured questionnaire based on four hypothetical moral dilemmas involving combinations of (health care) professional, non-professional, life-threatening and non-life-threatening situations, was piloted and then mailed to a randomly selected sample of doctors and nurses. SETTING: 400 doctors from Victoria, and 200 doctors and 400 nurses from New South Wales. RESULTS: 178 doctors and 122 nurses returned completed questionnaires. 115 doctors were male, 61 female; 50 nurses were male and 72 were female. It was hypothesised that there would be an association between feminine subjects and partialist reasoning and masculine subjects and impartialist reasoning. It was also hypothesised that nurses would adopt a partialist approach to reasoning and doctors an impartialist approach. No relationship between any of these variables was observed.

Full text

PDF
226

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Grundstein-Amado R. Differences in ethical decision-making processes among nurses and doctors. J Adv Nurs. 1992 Feb;17(2):129–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01867.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jecker N. S., Self D. J. Separating care and cure: an analysis of historical and contemporary images of nursing and medicine. J Med Philos. 1991 Jun;16(3):285–306. doi: 10.1093/jmp/16.3.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kohlberg L., Kramer R. Continuities and discontinuities in childhood and adult moral development. Hum Dev. 1969;12(2):93–120. doi: 10.1159/000270857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Walker L. J. A longitudinal study of moral reasoning. Child Dev. 1989 Feb;60(1):157–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1989.tb02705.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. White C. B. Age, education, and sex effects on adult moral reasoning. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1988;27(4):271–281. doi: 10.2190/CF38-5HXA-PDN9-AKXK. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES