Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 1997 Oct;23(5):271–276. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.5.271

Experienced consent in geriatrics research: a new method to optimize the capacity to consent in frail elderly subjects.

M G Rikkert 1, J H van den Bercken 1, H A ten Have 1, W H Hoefnagels 1
PMCID: PMC1377364  PMID: 9358345

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cognitive and sensory difficulties frequently jeopardize informed consent of frail elderly patients This study is the first to test whether preliminary research experience could enhance geriatric patients' capacity to consent. DESIGN/SETTING: A step-wise consent procedure was introduced in a study on fluid balance in geriatric patients. Eligible patients providing verbal consent participated in a try-out of a week, during which bioelectrical impedance and weight measurements were performed daily. Afterwards, written informed consent was requested. Comprehension, risk and inconvenience scores (ranges: 0-10) were obtained before and after the try-out by asking ten questions about the study's essentials and by asking for a risk and inconvenience assessment on a ten-points rating scale. SUBJECTS AND RESULTS: Seventy of the 78 eligible subjects started the try-out and 53 (68%) provided written consent. The comprehension score increased from 5.0 (+/- 2.3) to 7.0 (+/- 1.9) following the try-out (P < 0.001). The number of subjects capable of weighing risks and inconveniences increased from 32 to 48 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Research experience improved the capacity to consent, still enabling an acceptable participation rate. Therefore, experienced consent seems a promising tool to optimize informed consent in frail elderly subjects.

Full text

PDF
271

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Annas G. J., Glantz L. H. Rules for research in nursing homes. N Engl J Med. 1986 Oct 30;315(18):1157–1158. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198610303151809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berg L. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24(4):637–639. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berkowitz S. Informed consent, research, and the elderly. Gerontologist. 1978 Jun;18(3):237–243. doi: 10.1093/geront/18.3.237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brod M. S., Feinbloom R. I. Feasibility and efficacy of verbal consents. Res Aging. 1990 Sep;12(3):364–372. doi: 10.1177/0164027590123005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cassel C. K. Ethical issues in the conduct of research in long term care. Gerontologist. 1988 Jun;28 (Suppl):90–96. doi: 10.1093/geront/28.suppl.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen-Mansfield J., Kerin P., Pawlson G., Lipson S., Holdridge K. Informed consent for research in a nursing home: processes and issues. Gerontologist. 1988 Jun;28(3):355–359. doi: 10.1093/geront/28.3.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fleming K. C., Evans J. M., Weber D. C., Chutka D. S. Practical functional assessment of elderly persons: a primary-care approach. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995 Sep;70(9):890–910. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)63949-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. High D. M. Research with Alzheimer's disease subjects: informed consent and proxy decision making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 Sep;40(9):950–957. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01995.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lang J. M. The use of a run-in to enhance compliance. Stat Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;9(1-2):87–95. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lo B. Assessing decision-making capacity. Law Med Health Care. 1990 Fall;18(3):193–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1990.tb00022.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lukaski H. C., Johnson P. E., Bolonchuk W. W., Lykken G. I. Assessment of fat-free mass using bioelectrical impedance measurements of the human body. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985 Apr;41(4):810–817. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/41.4.810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lynöe N., Sandlund M., Dahlqvist G., Jacobsson L. Informed consent: study of quality of information given to participants in a clinical trial. BMJ. 1991 Sep 14;303(6803):610–613. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6803.610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miller R., Willner H. S. The two-part consent form: A suggestion for promoting free and informed consent. N Engl J Med. 1974 Apr 25;290(17):964–966. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197404252901712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ouslander J. G., Schnelle J. F. Research in nursing homes: practical aspects. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Feb;41(2):182–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb02055.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sachs G. A., Cassel C. K. Biomedical research involving older human subjects. Law Med Health Care. 1990 Fall;18(3):234–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1990.tb00026.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stanley B., Guido J., Stanley M., Shortell D. The elderly patient and informed consent. Empirical findings. JAMA. 1984 Sep 14;252(10):1302–1306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tymchuk A. J., Andron L., Rahbar B. Effective decision-making/problem-solving training with mothers who have mental retardation. Am J Ment Retard. 1988 May;92(6):510–516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tymchuk A. J., Ouslander J. G., Rader N. Informing the elderly. A comparison of four methods. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986 Nov;34(11):818–822. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb03989.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tymchuk Alexander J. An alternative conceptualization of informed consent with people who are elderly. Educ Gerontol. 1992 Mar;18(2):135–147. doi: 10.1080/0360127920180202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tymchuk Alexander J., Ouslander Joseph G. Optimizing the informed consent process with elderly people. Educ Gerontol. 1990;16(3):245–257. doi: 10.1080/0380127900160302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Visser M., Deurenberg P., van Staveren W. A. Multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance for assessing total body water and extracellular water in elderly subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1995 Apr;49(4):256–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES