Abstract
The principle of informed consent is now well established within the National Health Service (NHS) in relation to any type of medical treatment. However, this ethical principle appears to be far less well established in relation to medical screening programmes such as Britain's national cervical screening programme. This article will critically examine the case for health care providers vigorously pursuing women to accept an invitation to be screened. It will discuss the type of information which women would need in order to make an informed decision about whether or not to be screened. The lack of such information in current patient leaflets on the "smear test" will then be documented. Finally, the article will explore possible ways of maximising women's autonomy in relation to the cervical screening programme without sacrificing any of its main benefits.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Foster P. Inequalities in health: what health systems can and cannot do. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Jul;1(3):179–182. doi: 10.1177/135581969600100313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCormick J. S. Cervical smears: a questionable practice? Lancet. 1989 Jul 22;2(8656):207–209. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90384-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raffle A. E., Alden B., Mackenzie E. F. Detection rates for abnormal cervical smears: what are we screening for? Lancet. 1995 Jun 10;345(8963):1469–1473. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91036-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz M., Savage W., George J., Emohare L. Women's knowledge and experience of cervical screening: a failure of health education and medical organization. Community Med. 1989 Nov;11(4):279–289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skrabanek P. Cervical cancer in nuns and prostitutes: a plea for scientific continence. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(6):577–582. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90062-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skrabanek P. Why is preventive medicine exempted from ethical constraints? J Med Ethics. 1990 Dec;16(4):187–190. doi: 10.1136/jme.16.4.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]