Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1998 Nov;63(5):1492–1506. doi: 10.1086/302094

Use of parents, sibs, and unrelated controls for detection of associations between genetic markers and disease.

D J Schaid 1, C Rowland 1
PMCID: PMC1377560  PMID: 9792877

Abstract

Detecting the association between genetic markers and complex diseases can be a critical first step toward identification of the genetic basis of disease. Misleading associations can be avoided by choosing as controls the parents of diseased cases, but the availability of parents often limits this design to early-onset disease. Alternatively, sib controls offer a valid design. A general multivariate score statistic is presented, to detect the association between a multiallelic genetic marker locus and affection status; this general approach is applicable to designs that use parents as controls, sibs as controls, or even unrelated controls whose genotypes do not fit Hardy-Weinberg proportions or that pool any combination of these different designs. The benefit of this multivariate score statistic is that it will tend to be the most powerful method when multiple marker alleles are associated with affection status. To plan these types of studies, we present methods to compute sample size and power, allowing for varying sibship sizes, ascertainment criteria, and genetic models of risk. The results indicate that sib controls have less power than parental controls and that the power of sib controls can be increased by increasing either the number of affected sibs per sibship or the number of unaffected control sibs. The sample-size results indicate that the use of sib controls to test for associations, by use of either a single-marker locus or a genomewide screen, will be feasible for markers that have a dominant effect and for common alleles having a recessive effect. The results presented will be useful for investigators planning studies using sibs as controls.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (655.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boehnke M., Langefeld C. D. Genetic association mapping based on discordant sib pairs: the discordant-alleles test. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Apr;62(4):950–961. doi: 10.1086/301787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Curtis D., Sham P. C. A note on the application of the transmission disequilibrium test when a parent is missing. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Mar;56(3):811–812. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Curtis D. Use of siblings as controls in case-control association studies. Ann Hum Genet. 1997 Jul;61(Pt 4):319–333. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-1809.1998.6210089.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lander E. S. The new genomics: global views of biology. Science. 1996 Oct 25;274(5287):536–539. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5287.536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MANTEL N., HAENSZEL W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Apr;22(4):719–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MANUILA A. Blood groups and disease-hard facts and delusions. J Am Med Assoc. 1958 Aug 23;167(17):2047–2053. doi: 10.1001/jama.1958.02990340007002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mantel N., Fleiss J. L. Minimum expected cell size requirements for the Mantel-Haenszel one-degree-of-freedom chi-square test and a related rapid procedure. Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Jul;112(1):129–134. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Risch N., Merikangas K. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science. 1996 Sep 13;273(5281):1516–1517. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5281.1516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schaid D. J., Li H. Genotype relative-risks and association tests for nuclear families with missing parental data. Genet Epidemiol. 1997;14(6):1113–1118. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<1113::AID-GEPI92>3.0.CO;2-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schaid D. J. Relative-risk regression models using cases and their parents. Genet Epidemiol. 1995;12(6):813–818. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370120647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Self S. G., Longton G., Kopecky K. J., Liang K. Y. On estimating HLA/disease association with application to a study of aplastic anemia. Biometrics. 1991 Mar;47(1):53–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Spielman R. S., Ewens W. J. A sibship test for linkage in the presence of association: the sib transmission/disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Feb;62(2):450–458. doi: 10.1086/301714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Spielman R. S., McGinnis R. E., Ewens W. J. Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Mar;52(3):506–516. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ury H. K. Efficiency of case-control studies with multiple controls per case: continuous or dichotomous data. Biometrics. 1975 Sep;31(3):643–649. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES