Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1999 Jan;64(1):225–231. doi: 10.1086/302198

Inbreeding effects on fertility in humans: evidence for reproductive compensation.

C Ober 1, T Hyslop 1, W W Hauck 1
PMCID: PMC1377721  PMID: 9915962

Abstract

The effects of inbreeding on prereproductive mortality have been demonstrated in many natural populations, including humans. However, little is known about the effects in inbred individuals who survive to adulthood. We have investigated the effects of inbreeding on fertility among inbred adult Hutterites and demonstrate significantly reduced fecundity among the most inbred Hutterite women, as evidenced by longer interbirth intervals (P=.024) and longer intervals to a recognized pregnancy (P=.010) but not by increased rates of fetal loss (P>.50). These data suggest the presence of recessive alleles that adversely affect fecundity among the population. In contrast, completed family sizes do not differ among the more and the less-inbred Hutterite women who were born after 1920, suggesting that reproductive compensation is occurring among the more-inbred and less-fecund women. This recent reproductive strategy would facilitate the maintenance of recessive alleles and contribute to an overall decline in fertility in the population.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (230.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bittles A. H., Neel J. V. The costs of human inbreeding and their implications for variations at the DNA level. Nat Genet. 1994 Oct;8(2):117–121. doi: 10.1038/ng1094-117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Khoury M. J., Cohen B. H., Diamond E. L., Chase G. A., McKusick V. A. Inbreeding and prereproductive mortality in the Old Order Amish. I. Genealogic epidemiology of inbreeding. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Mar;125(3):453–461. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. MANGE A. P. GROWTH AND INBREEDING OF A HUMAN ISOLATE. Hum Biol. 1964 May;36:104–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MORTON N. E. Empirical risks in consanguineous marriages: birth weight, gestation time, and measurements of infants. Am J Hum Genet. 1958 Sep;10(3):344–349. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Morton N. E., Crow J. F., Muller H. J. AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1956 Nov;42(11):855–863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.42.11.855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ober C. Current topic: HLA and reproduction: lessons from studies in the Hutterites. Placenta. 1995 Oct;16(7):569–577. doi: 10.1016/0143-4004(95)90026-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ober C., Elias S., Kostyu D. D., Hauck W. W. Decreased fecundability in Hutterite couples sharing HLA-DR. Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Jan;50(1):6–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ober C., Hyslop T., Elias S., Weitkamp L. R., Hauck W. W. Human leukocyte antigen matching and fetal loss: results of a 10 year prospective study. Hum Reprod. 1998 Jan;13(1):33–38. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Reed T. E. Dogma disputed. Does reproductive compensation exist? An analysis of Rh data. Am J Hum Genet. 1971 Mar;23(2):215–224. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SCHULL W. J. Empirical risks in consanguineous marriages: sex ratio, malformation, and viability. Am J Hum Genet. 1958 Sep;10(3):294–343. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schull W. J., Neel J. V. The effects of parental consanguinity and inbreeding in Hirado, Japan. V. Summary and interpretation. Am J Hum Genet. 1972 Jul;24(4):425–453. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES