Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1999 Sep;65(3):847–857. doi: 10.1086/302536

Direct power comparisons between simple LOD scores and NPL scores for linkage analysis in complex diseases.

P C Abreu 1, D A Greenberg 1, S E Hodge 1
PMCID: PMC1377991  PMID: 10441591

Abstract

Several methods have been proposed for linkage analysis of complex traits with unknown mode of inheritance. These methods include the LOD score maximized over disease models (MMLS) and the "nonparametric" linkage (NPL) statistic. In previous work, we evaluated the increase of type I error when maximizing over two or more genetic models, and we compared the power of MMLS to detect linkage, in a number of complex modes of inheritance, with analysis assuming the true model. In the present study, we compare MMLS and NPL directly. We simulated 100 data sets with 20 families each, using 26 generating models: (1) 4 intermediate models (penetrance of heterozygote between that of the two homozygotes); (2) 6 two-locus additive models; and (3) 16 two-locus heterogeneity models (admixture alpha = 1.0,.7,.5, and.3; alpha = 1.0 replicates simple Mendelian models). For LOD scores, we assumed dominant and recessive inheritance with 50% penetrance. We took the higher of the two maximum LOD scores and subtracted 0.3 to correct for multiple tests (MMLS-C). We compared expected maximum LOD scores and power, using MMLS-C and NPL as well as the true model. Since NPL uses only the affected family members, we also performed an affecteds-only analysis using MMLS-C. The MMLS-C was both uniformly more powerful than NPL for most cases we examined, except when linkage information was low, and close to the results for the true model under locus heterogeneity. We still found better power for the MMLS-C compared with NPL in affecteds-only analysis. The results show that use of two simple modes of inheritance at a fixed penetrance can have more power than NPL when the trait mode of inheritance is complex and when there is heterogeneity in the data set.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (303.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Badner J. A., Gershon E. S., Goldin L. R. Optimal ascertainment strategies to detect linkage to common disease alleles. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Sep;63(3):880–888. doi: 10.1086/302007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davis S., Weeks D. E. Comparison of nonparametric statistics for detection of linkage in nuclear families: single-marker evaluation. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Dec;61(6):1431–1444. doi: 10.1086/301635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dizier M. H., Babron M. C., Clerget-Darpoux F. Conclusion of LOD-score analysis for family data generated under two-locus models. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Jun;58(6):1338–1346. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Durner M., Greenberg D. A. Effect of heterogeneity and assumed mode of inheritance on lod scores. Am J Med Genet. 1992 Feb 1;42(3):271–275. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320420302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Durner M., Vieland V. J., Greenberg D. A. Further evidence for the increased power of LOD scores compared with nonparametric methods. Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Jan;64(1):281–289. doi: 10.1086/302181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldin L. R., Weeks D. E. Two-locus models of disease: comparison of likelihood and nonparametric linkage methods. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Oct;53(4):908–915. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Greenberg D. A. A simple method for testing two-locus models of inheritance. Am J Hum Genet. 1981 Jul;33(4):519–530. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Greenberg D. A., Abreu P., Hodge S. E. The power to detect linkage in complex disease by means of simple LOD-score analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Sep;63(3):870–879. doi: 10.1086/301997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Greenberg D. A., Berger B. Using lod-score differences to determine mode of inheritance: a simple, robust method even in the presence of heterogeneity and reduced penetrance. Am J Hum Genet. 1994 Oct;55(4):834–840. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Greenberg D. A., Doneshka P. Partitioned association-linkage test: distinguishing "necessary" from "susceptibility" loci. Genet Epidemiol. 1996;13(3):243–252. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:3<243::AID-GEPI2>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Greenberg D. A., Hodge S. E. Linkage analysis under "random" and "genetic" reduced penetrance. Genet Epidemiol. 1989;6(1):259–264. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370060145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hodge S. E., Abreu P. C., Greenberg D. A. Magnitude of type I error when single-locus linkage analysis is maximized over models: a simulation study. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Jan;60(1):217–227. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hodge S. E., Elston R. C. Lods, wrods, and mods: the interpretation of lod scores calculated under different models. Genet Epidemiol. 1994;11(4):329–342. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370110403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kong A., Cox N. J. Allele-sharing models: LOD scores and accurate linkage tests. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Nov;61(5):1179–1188. doi: 10.1086/301592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kruglyak L., Daly M. J., Reeve-Daly M. P., Lander E. S. Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Jun;58(6):1347–1363. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vieland V. J., Greenberg D. A., Hodge S. E. Adequacy of single-locus approximations for linkage analyses of oligogenic traits: extension to multigenerational pedigree structures. Hum Hered. 1993 Nov-Dec;43(6):329–336. doi: 10.1159/000154155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vieland V. J., Hodge S. E., Greenberg D. A. Adequacy of single-locus approximations for linkage analyses of oligogenic traits. Genet Epidemiol. 1992;9(1):45–59. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370090106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Whittemore A. S., Halpern J. A class of tests for linkage using affected pedigree members. Biometrics. 1994 Mar;50(1):118–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Whittemore A. S., Halpern J. Probability of gene identity by descent: computation and applications. Biometrics. 1994 Mar;50(1):109–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES