Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 2000 Apr 4;66(5):1610–1615. doi: 10.1086/302889

Equivalence of single- and multilocus markers: power to detect linkage with composite markers derived from biallelic loci.

A F Wilson 1, A J Sorant 1
PMCID: PMC1378019  PMID: 10762546

Abstract

The reintroduction of biallelic markers, now in the form of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), has again raised concerns about the practicality of the use of markers with low heterozygosity for genomic screening for complex traits, even if thousands of such markers are available. Like the early blood-group markers (e.g., Rh and MNS), tightly linked biallelic SNPs can be combined into composite markers with heterozygosity similar to that of short-tandem-repeat polymorphisms. The assumptions that underlie the equivalence between single-locus multiallelic and composite markers are presented. We used computer simulation to determine the power of the Haseman-Elston test for linkage with composite markers when not all of these assumptions hold. The Genometric Analysis Simulation Program was used to simulate continuous and discrete traits, one single-locus four-allele marker, and six biallelic markers. We studied composite markers created from pairs, trios, and quartets of biallelic markers in nuclear families and in independent sib pairs. The power to detect linkage with a two-point approach for composite markers and with a multipoint approach that incorporated all six biallelic markers was compared with that for a single-locus, four-allele reference marker. Although the power to detect linkage with a single biallelic marker was considerably less than that of the reference marker, the power to detect linkage with two- and three-locus composite markers was quite similar to that of the reference marker. The power to detect linkage with four-locus composite markers was similar to that of a multipoint approach.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (177.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amos C. I., Elston R. C., Wilson A. F., Bailey-Wilson J. E. A more powerful robust sib-pair test of linkage for quantitative traits. Genet Epidemiol. 1989;6(3):435–449. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370060306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goldin L. R., Chase G. A. Improvement of the power to detect complex disease genes by regional inference procedures. Genet Epidemiol. 1997;14(6):785–789. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<785::AID-GEPI37>3.0.CO;2-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldin L. R., Chase G. A., Wilson A. F. Regional inference with averaged P values increases the power to detect linkage. Genet Epidemiol. 1999;17(3):157–164. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1999)17:3<157::AID-GEPI1>3.0.CO;2-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Haseman J. K., Elston R. C. The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus. Behav Genet. 1972 Mar;2(1):3–19. doi: 10.1007/BF01066731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hodge S. E., Boehnke M., Spence M. A. Loss of information due to ambiguous haplotyping of SNPs. Nat Genet. 1999 Apr;21(4):360–361. doi: 10.1038/7687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Holmans P., Clayton D. Efficiency of typing unaffected relatives in an affected-sib-pair linkage study with single-locus and multiple tightly linked markers. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Nov;57(5):1221–1232. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kruglyak L., Lander E. S. Complete multipoint sib-pair analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Aug;57(2):439–454. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kruglyak L. The use of a genetic map of biallelic markers in linkage studies. Nat Genet. 1997 Sep;17(1):21–24. doi: 10.1038/ng0997-21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang D. G., Fan J. B., Siao C. J., Berno A., Young P., Sapolsky R., Ghandour G., Perkins N., Winchester E., Spencer J. Large-scale identification, mapping, and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome. Science. 1998 May 15;280(5366):1077–1082. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5366.1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wilson A. F., Elston R. C. Statistical validity of the Haseman-Elston sib-pair test in small samples. Genet Epidemiol. 1993;10(6):593–598. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370100644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES