Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 2000 Apr 5;66(5):1631–1641. doi: 10.1086/302900

A unified sampling approach for multipoint analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits in sib pairs.

K Y Liang 1, C Y Huang 1, T H Beaty 1
PMCID: PMC1378021  PMID: 10762548

Abstract

Recent advances in molecular biology have enhanced the opportunity to conduct multipoint mapping for complex diseases. Concurrently, one sees a growing interest in the use of quantitative traits in linkage studies. Here, we present a multipoint sib-pair approach to locate the map position (tau) of a trait locus that controls the observed phenotype (qualitative or quantitative), along with a measure of statistical uncertainty. This method builds on a parametric representation for the expected identical-by-descent statistic at an arbitrary locus, conditional on an event reflecting the sampling scheme, such as affected sib pairs, for qualitative traits, or extreme discordant (ED) sib pairs, for quantitative traits. Our results suggest that the variance about tau&d4;, the estimator of tau, can be reduced by as much as 60%-70% by reducing the length of intervals between markers by one half. For quantitative traits, we examine the precision gain (measured by the variance reduction in tau&d4;) by genotyping extremely concordant (EC) sib pairs and including them along with ED sib pairs in the statistical analysis. The precision gain depends heavily on the residual correlation of the quantitative trait for sib pairs but considerably less on the allele frequency and exact genetic mechanism. Since complex traits involve multiple loci and, hence, the residual correlation cannot be ignored, our finding strongly suggests that one should incorporate EC sib pairs along with ED sib pairs, in both design and analysis. Finally, we empirically establish a simple linear relationship between the magnitude of precision gain and the ratio of the number of ED pairs to the number of EC pairs. This relationship allows investigators to address issues of cost effectiveness that are due to the need for phenotyping and genotyping subjects.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (232.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allison D. B., Neale M. C., Zannolli R., Schork N. J., Amos C. I., Blangero J. Testing the robustness of the likelihood-ratio test in a variance-component quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure. Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Aug;65(2):531–544. doi: 10.1086/302487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cardon L. R., Fulker D. W. The power of interval mapping of quantitative trait loci, using selected sib pairs. Am J Hum Genet. 1994 Oct;55(4):825–833. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carey G., Williamson J. Linkage analysis of quantitative traits: increased power by using selected samples. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Oct;49(4):786–796. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eaves L., Meyer J. Locating human quantitative trait loci: guidelines for the selection of sibling pairs for genotyping. Behav Genet. 1994 Sep;24(5):443–455. doi: 10.1007/BF01076180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fulker D. W., Cardon L. R. A sib-pair approach to interval mapping of quantitative trait loci. Am J Hum Genet. 1994 Jun;54(6):1092–1103. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldgar D. E. Multipoint analysis of human quantitative genetic variation. Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Dec;47(6):957–967. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gu C., Rao D. C. A linkage strategy for detection of human quantitative-trait loci. II. Optimization of study designs based on extreme sib pairs and generalized relative risk ratios. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Jul;61(1):211–222. doi: 10.1086/513909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gu C., Todorov A., Rao D. C. Combining extremely concordant sibpairs with extremely discordant sibpairs provides a cost effective way to linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci. Genet Epidemiol. 1996;13(6):513–533. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:6<513::AID-GEPI1>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Haseman J. K., Elston R. C. The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus. Behav Genet. 1972 Mar;2(1):3–19. doi: 10.1007/BF01066731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Risch N., Zhang H. Extreme discordant sib pairs for mapping quantitative trait loci in humans. Science. 1995 Jun 16;268(5217):1584–1589. doi: 10.1126/science.7777857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhao H., Zhang H., Rotter J. I. Cost-effective sib-pair designs in the mapping of quantitative-trait loci. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 May;60(5):1211–1221. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES