Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 2000 Apr 11;66(5):1661–1668. doi: 10.1086/302888

Power comparison of parametric and nonparametric linkage tests in small pedigrees.

P C Sham 1, M W Lin 1, J H Zhao 1, D Curtis 1
PMCID: PMC1378023  PMID: 10762550

Abstract

When the mode of inheritance of a disease is unknown, the LOD-score method of linkage analysis must take into account uncertainties in model parameters. We have previously proposed a parametric linkage test called "MFLOD," which does not require specification of disease model parameters. In the present study, we introduce two new model-free parametric linkage tests, known as "MLOD" and "MALOD." These tests are defined, respectively, as the LOD score and the admixture LOD score, maximized (subject to the same constraints as MFLOD) over disease-model parameters. We compared the power of these three parametric linkage tests and that of two nonparametric linkage tests, NPLall and NPLpairs, which are implemented in GENEHUNTER. With the use of small pedigrees and a fully informative marker, we found the powers of MLOD, NPLall, and NPLpairs to be almost equivalent to each other and not far below that of a LOD-score analysis performed under the assumption the correct genetic parameters. Thus, linkage analysis is not much hindered by uncertain mode of inheritance. The results also suggest that both parametric and nonparametric methods are suitable for linkage analysis of complex disorders in small pedigrees. However, whether these results apply to large pedigrees remains to be answered.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (196.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clerget-Darpoux F., Bonaïti-Pellié C., Hochez J. Effects of misspecifying genetic parameters in lod score analysis. Biometrics. 1986 Jun;42(2):393–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Curtis D., Sham P. C. Model-free linkage analysis using likelihoods. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Sep;57(3):703–716. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Curtis D., Sham P. C. Using risk calculation to implement an extended relative pair analysis. Ann Hum Genet. 1994 May;58(Pt 2):151–162. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1994.tb01884.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis S., Schroeder M., Goldin L. R., Weeks D. E. Nonparametric simulation-based statistics for detecting linkage in general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Apr;58(4):867–880. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Greenberg D. A., Abreu P., Hodge S. E. The power to detect linkage in complex disease by means of simple LOD-score analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Sep;63(3):870–879. doi: 10.1086/301997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Greenberg D. A., Hodge S. E. Linkage analysis under "random" and "genetic" reduced penetrance. Genet Epidemiol. 1989;6(1):259–264. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370060145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Greenberg D. A. Inferring mode of inheritance by comparison of lod scores. Am J Med Genet. 1989 Dec;34(4):480–486. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320340406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Greenberg D. A. Linkage analysis assuming a single-locus mode of inheritance for traits determined by two loci: inferring mode of inheritance and estimating penetrance. Genet Epidemiol. 1990;7(6):467–479. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370070608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hodge S. E., Abreu P. C., Greenberg D. A. Magnitude of type I error when single-locus linkage analysis is maximized over models: a simulation study. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Jan;60(1):217–227. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hodge S. E., Elston R. C. Lods, wrods, and mods: the interpretation of lod scores calculated under different models. Genet Epidemiol. 1994;11(4):329–342. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370110403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hodge S. E. Exact elods and exact power for affected sib pairs analyzed for linkage under simple right and wrong models. Am J Med Genet. 1998 Feb 7;81(1):66–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Holmans P. Asymptotic properties of affected-sib-pair linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Feb;52(2):362–374. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Knapp M., Seuchter S. A., Baur M. P. Linkage analysis in nuclear families. 2: Relationship between affected sib-pair tests and lod score analysis. Hum Hered. 1994 Jan-Feb;44(1):44–51. doi: 10.1159/000154188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kong A., Cox N. J. Allele-sharing models: LOD scores and accurate linkage tests. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Nov;61(5):1179–1188. doi: 10.1086/301592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kruglyak L., Daly M. J., Reeve-Daly M. P., Lander E. S. Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Jun;58(6):1347–1363. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MacLean C. J., Sham P. C., Kendler K. S. Joint linkage of multiple loci for a complex disorder. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Aug;53(2):353–366. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. O'Connell J. R., Weeks D. E. The VITESSE algorithm for rapid exact multilocus linkage analysis via genotype set-recoding and fuzzy inheritance. Nat Genet. 1995 Dec;11(4):402–408. doi: 10.1038/ng1295-402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rice J. P., Neuman R. J., Hoshaw S. L., Daw E. W., Gu C. TDT with covariates and genomic screens with mod scores: their behavior on simulated data. Genet Epidemiol. 1995;12(6):659–664. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370120623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Risch N., Giuffra L. Model misspecification and multipoint linkage analysis. Hum Hered. 1992;42(1):77–92. doi: 10.1159/000154047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Risch N. Segregation analysis incorporating linkage markers. I. Single-locus models with an application to type I diabetes. Am J Hum Genet. 1984 Mar;36(2):363–386. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Suarez B. K., Rice J., Reich T. The generalized sib pair IBD distribution: its use in the detection of linkage. Ann Hum Genet. 1978 Jul;42(1):87–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1978.tb00933.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Weeks D. E., Lange K. The affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Feb;42(2):315–326. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES