Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 2000 May 8;66(6):1911–1926. doi: 10.1086/302923

Characterization of human crossover interference.

K W Broman 1, J L Weber 1
PMCID: PMC1378063  PMID: 10801387

Abstract

We present an analysis of crossover interference over the entire human genome, on the basis of genotype data from more than 8,000 polymorphisms in eight CEPH families. Overwhelming evidence was found for strong positive crossover interference, with average strength lying between the levels of interference implied by the Kosambi and Carter-Falconer map functions. Five mathematical models of interference were evaluated: the gamma model and four versions of the count-location model. The gamma model fit the data far better than did any of the other four models. Analysis of intercrossover distances was greatly superior to the analysis of crossover counts, in both demonstrating interference and distinguishing between the five models. In contrast to earlier suggestions, interference was found to continue uninterrupted across the centromeres. No convincing differences in the levels of interference were found between the sexes or among chromosomes; however, we did detect possible individual variation in interference among the eight mothers. Finally, we present an equation that provides the probability of the occurrence of a double crossover between two nonrecombinant, informative polymorphisms.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (291.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Attwood J., Chiano M., Collins A., Donis-Keller H., Dracopoli N., Fountain J., Falk C., Goudie D., Gusella J., Haines J. CEPH consortium Map of chromosome 9. Genomics. 1994 Jan 15;19(2):203–214. doi: 10.1006/geno.1994.1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bishop D. T., Thompson E. A. Linkage information and bias in the presence of interference. Genet Epidemiol. 1988;5(2):107–119. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370050206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blank R. D., Campbell G. R., Calabro A., D'Eustachio P. A linkage map of mouse chromosome 12: localization of Igh and effects of sex and interference on recombination. Genetics. 1988 Dec;120(4):1073–1083. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.4.1073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Broman K. W., Weber J. L. Long homozygous chromosomal segments in reference families from the centre d'Etude du polymorphisme humain. Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Dec;65(6):1493–1500. doi: 10.1086/302661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bugge M., Collins A., Petersen M. B., Fisher J., Brandt C., Hertz J. M., Tranebjaerg L., de Lozier-Blanchet C., Nicolaides P., Brøndum-Nielsen K. Non-disjunction of chromosome 18. Hum Mol Genet. 1998 Apr;7(4):661–669. doi: 10.1093/hmg/7.4.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ceci J. D., Siracusa L. D., Jenkins N. A., Copeland N. G. A molecular genetic linkage map of mouse chromosome 4 including the localization of several proto-oncogenes. Genomics. 1989 Nov;5(4):699–709. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(89)90111-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chua P. R., Roeder G. S. Tam1, a telomere-associated meiotic protein, functions in chromosome synapsis and crossover interference. Genes Dev. 1997 Jul 15;11(14):1786–1800. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.14.1786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Collins A., Forabosco P., Lawrence S., Morton N. E. An integrated map of chromosome 9. Ann Hum Genet. 1995 Oct;59(Pt 4):393–402. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1995.tb00758.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Collins A., Frezal J., Teague J., Morton N. E. A metric map of humans: 23,500 loci in 850 bands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 10;93(25):14771–14775. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Collins A., Keats B. J., Dracopoli N., Shields D. C., Morton N. E. Integration of gene maps: chromosome 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 15;89(10):4598–4602. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Colombo P. C., Jones G. H. Chiasma interference is blind to centromeres. Heredity (Edinb) 1997 Aug;79(Pt 2):214–227. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1997.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cox S., Bryant S. P., Collins A., Weissenbach J., Donis-Keller H., Koeleman B. P., Steinkasserer A., Spurr N. K. Integrated genetic map of human chromosome 2. Ann Hum Genet. 1995 Oct;59(Pt 4):413–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1995.tb00760.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dib C., Fauré S., Fizames C., Samson D., Drouot N., Vignal A., Millasseau P., Marc S., Hazan J., Seboun E. A comprehensive genetic map of the human genome based on 5,264 microsatellites. Nature. 1996 Mar 14;380(6570):152–154. doi: 10.1038/380152a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Egel R. The synaptonemal complex and the distribution of meiotic recombination events. Trends Genet. 1995 Jun;11(6):206–208. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)89046-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Forabosco P., Collins A., Morton N. E. Integration of gene maps: updating chromosome 1. Ann Hum Genet. 1995 Jul;59(Pt 3):291–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1995.tb00749.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Foss E. J., Stahl F. W. A test of a counting model for chiasma interference. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1201–1209. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Foss E., Lande R., Stahl F. W., Steinberg C. M. Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):681–691. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Goldgar D. E., Fain P. R., Kimberling W. J. Chiasma-based models of multilocus recombination: increased power for exclusion mapping and gene ordering. Genomics. 1989 Aug;5(2):283–290. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(89)90059-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Goldgar D. E., Fain P. R. Models of multilocus recombination: nonrandomness in chiasma number and crossover positions. Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Jul;43(1):38–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Goldstein D. R., Zhao H., Speed T. P. Relative efficiencies of chi 2 models of recombination for exclusion mapping and gene ordering. Genomics. 1995 May 20;27(2):265–273. doi: 10.1006/geno.1995.1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Haines J. L., Guillemette W., Rosen D., Brown R., Jr, Donaldson D., Patterson D. A genetic linkage map of chromosome 21: a look at meiotic phenomena. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1993;384:51–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hudson T. J., Stein L. D., Gerety S. S., Ma J., Castle A. B., Silva J., Slonim D. K., Baptista R., Kruglyak L., Xu S. H. An STS-based map of the human genome. Science. 1995 Dec 22;270(5244):1945–1954. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5244.1945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hultén M. Chiasma distribution at diakinesis in the normal human male. Hereditas. 1974;76(1):55–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1974.tb01177.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hultén M., Lawrie N. M., Laurie D. A. Chiasma-based genetic maps of chromosome 21. Am J Med Genet Suppl. 1990;7:148–154. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320370730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kaback D. B., Barber D., Mahon J., Lamb J., You J. Chromosome size-dependent control of meiotic reciprocal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of crossover interference. Genetics. 1999 Aug;152(4):1475–1486. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.4.1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kaback D. B. Chromosome-size dependent control of meiotic recombination in humans. Nat Genet. 1996 May;13(1):20–21. doi: 10.1038/ng0596-20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kaback D. B., Guacci V., Barber D., Mahon J. W. Chromosome size-dependent control of meiotic recombination. Science. 1992 Apr 10;256(5054):228–232. doi: 10.1126/science.1566070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Karlin S., Liberman U. Classifications and comparisons of multilocus recombination distributions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Dec;75(12):6332–6336. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.12.6332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Karlin S., Liberman U. Theoretical recombination processes incorporating interference effects. Theor Popul Biol. 1994 Oct;46(2):198–231. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1994.1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kingsley D. M., Jenkins N. A., Copeland N. G. A molecular genetic linkage map of mouse chromosome 9 with regional localizations for the Gsta, T3g, Ets-1 and Ldlr loci. Genetics. 1989 Sep;123(1):165–172. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.1.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kwiatkowski D. J., Dib C., Slaugenhaupt S. A., Povey S., Gusella J. F., Haines J. L. An index marker map of chromosome 9 provides strong evidence for positive interference. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Dec;53(6):1279–1288. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lander E. S., Green P. Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(8):2363–2367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.8.2363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Laurie D. A., Hultén M. A. Further studies on bivalent chiasma frequency in human males with normal karyotypes. Ann Hum Genet. 1985 Jul;49(Pt 3):189–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1985.tb01693.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Laurie D. A., Hultén M. A. Further studies on chiasma distribution and interference in the human male. Ann Hum Genet. 1985 Jul;49(Pt 3):203–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1985.tb01694.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lawrence S., Collins A., Keats B. J., Hulten M., Morton N. E. Integration of gene maps: chromosome 21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Aug 1;90(15):7210–7214. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.15.7210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lin S., Speed T. P. Relative efficiencies of the chi-square recombination models for gene mapping with human pedigree data. Ann Hum Genet. 1999 Jan;63(Pt 1):81–95. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-1809.1999.6310081.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. McInnis M. G., Chakravarti A., Blaschak J., Petersen M. B., Sharma V., Avramopoulos D., Blouin J. L., König U., Brahe C., Matise T. C. A linkage map of human chromosome 21:43 PCR markers at average intervals of 2.5 cM. Genomics. 1993 Jun;16(3):562–571. doi: 10.1006/geno.1993.1231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. McPeek M. S., Speed T. P. Modeling interference in genetic recombination. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1031–1044. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Munz P. An analysis of interference in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics. 1994 Jul;137(3):701–707. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.3.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Povey S., Smith M., Haines J., Kwiatkowski D., Fountain J., Bale A., Abbott C., Jackson I., Lawrie M., Hultén M. Report and abstracts of the First International Workshop on Chromosome 9. Held at Girton College Cambridge, UK, 22-24 March, 1992. Ann Hum Genet. 1992 Jul;56(Pt 3):167–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1992.tb01145.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rao D. C., Morton N. E., Lindsten J., Hultén M., Yee S. A mapping function for man. Hum Hered. 1977;27(2):99–104. doi: 10.1159/000152856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Risch N., Lange K. An alternative model of recombination and interference. Ann Hum Genet. 1979 Jul;43(1):61–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1979.tb01549.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Roeder G. S. Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. Genes Dev. 1997 Oct 15;11(20):2600–2621. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.20.2600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rosenberg M., Hui L., Ma J., Nusbaum H. C., Clark K., Robinson L., Dziadzio L., Swain P. M., Keith T., Hudson T. J. Characterization of short tandem repeats from thirty-one human telomeres. Genome Res. 1997 Sep;7(9):917–923. doi: 10.1101/gr.7.9.917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Schmitt K., Lazzeroni L. C., Foote S., Vollrath D., Fisher E. M., Goradia T. M., Lange K., Page D. C., Arnheim N. Multipoint linkage map of the human pseudoautosomal region, based on single-sperm typing: do double crossovers occur during male meiosis? Am J Hum Genet. 1994 Sep;55(3):423–430. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sheffield V. C., Weber J. L., Buetow K. H., Murray J. C., Even D. A., Wiles K., Gastier J. M., Pulido J. C., Yandava C., Sunden S. L. A collection of tri- and tetranucleotide repeat markers used to generate high quality, high resolution human genome-wide linkage maps. Hum Mol Genet. 1995 Oct;4(10):1837–1844. doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.10.1837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Shields D. C., Collins A., Buetow K. H., Morton N. E. Error filtration, interference, and the human linkage map. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 1;88(15):6501–6505. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.15.6501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sturt E. A mapping function for human chromosomes. Ann Hum Genet. 1976 Nov;40(2):147–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1976.tb00175.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sunden S. L., Businga T., Beck J., McClain A., Gastier J. M., Pulido J. C., Yandava C. N., Brody T., Ghazizadeh J., Weber J. L. Chromosomal assignment of 2900 tri- and tetranucleotide repeat markers using NIGMS somatic cell hybrid panel 2. Genomics. 1996 Feb 15;32(1):15–20. doi: 10.1006/geno.1996.0071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sym M., Roeder G. S. Crossover interference is abolished in the absence of a synaptonemal complex protein. Cell. 1994 Oct 21;79(2):283–292. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90197-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tanzi R. E., Watkins P. C., Stewart G. D., Wexler N. S., Gusella J. F., Haines J. L. A genetic linkage map of human chromosome 21: analysis of recombination as a function of sex and age. Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Mar;50(3):551–558. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Weber J. L., Wang Z., Hansen K., Stephenson M., Kappel C., Salzman S., Wilkie P. J., Keats B., Dracopoli N. C., Brandriff B. F. Evidence for human meiotic recombination interference obtained through construction of a short tandem repeat-polymorphism linkage map of chromosome 19. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Nov;53(5):1079–1095. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Weeks D. E., Ott J., Lathrop G. M. Detection of genetic interference: simulation studies and mouse data. Genetics. 1994 Mar;136(3):1217–1226. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.1217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Weinstein A. The Theory of Multiple-Strand Crossing over. Genetics. 1936 May;21(3):155–199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/21.3.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Yu J., Lazzeroni L., Qin J., Huang M. M., Navidi W., Erlich H., Arnheim N. Individual variation in recombination among human males. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Dec;59(6):1186–1192. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zahn L. M., Kwiatkowski D. J. A 37-marker PCR-based genetic linkage map of human chromosome 9: observations on mutations and positive interference. Genomics. 1995 Jul 20;28(2):140–146. doi: 10.1006/geno.1995.1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhao H., McPeek M. S., Speed T. P. Statistical analysis of chromatid interference. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1057–1065. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.1057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhao H., Speed T. P., McPeek M. S. Statistical analysis of crossover interference using the chi-square model. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1045–1056. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.1045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhao H., Speed T. P. On genetic map functions. Genetics. 1996 Apr;142(4):1369–1377. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.4.1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES