Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Gut logoLink to Gut
. 1991 Nov;32(11):1264–1269. doi: 10.1136/gut.32.11.1264

Systematic comparison of conventional oesophageal manometry with oesophageal motility while eating bread.

P J Howard 1, L Maher 1, A Pryde 1, R C Heading 1
PMCID: PMC1379149  PMID: 1752452

Abstract

Conventional oesophageal manometry is seldom accompanied by symptoms and may indeed be normal in patients with a history of dysphagia. We have recently shown that oesophageal manometry during eating may be helpful in the evaluation of patients with dysphagia but there has been little systematic comparison of fed oesophageal motor patterns with conventional clinical manometry. Oesophageal manometry in response to water swallows and during eating was therefore examined in 58 consecutive patients who had been referred for clinical oesophageal function studies. The patients were divided into three groups according to the percentage of peristaltic activity during conventional manometry: group 1 (n = 21) had 100% peristalsis; group 2 (n = 29) had 1-99% peristalsis and group 3 (n = 8) were aperistaltic. All the patients in group 3 had achalasia and remained aperistaltic during eating, however, was less than with water swallows in both group 1 (53% compared with 100%) and group 2 (49% compared with 82.3%) patients. Synchronous contractions and non-conducted swallows were correspondingly increased during eating. Although there was a significant correlation between the amplitude of peristaltic contractions with water and bread in groups 1 and 2, mean peristaltic amplitudes were less with bread than with water swallows. The data show that there are substantial differences in the distal oesophageal motility patterns produced by water swallows and by eating. Conventional manometry with water swallows does not allow prediction of the fed oesophageal motility pattern, except in patients with achalasia.

Full text

PDF
1264

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen M. L., Orr W. C., Mellow M. H., Robinson M. G. Water swallows versus food ingestion as manometric tests for esophageal dysfunction. Gastroenterology. 1988 Sep;95(3):831–833. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(88)80036-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ask P., Tibbling L. Effect of time interval between swallows on esophageal peristalsis. Am J Physiol. 1980 Jun;238(6):G485–G490. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1980.238.6.G485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benjamin S. B., Gerhardt D. C., Castell D. O. High amplitude, peristaltic esophageal contractions associated with chest pain and/or dysphagia. Gastroenterology. 1979 Sep;77(3):478–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Benjamin S. B., Richter J. E., Cordova C. M., Knuff T. E., Castell D. O. Prospective manometric evaluation with pharmacologic provocation of patients with suspected esophageal motility dysfunction. Gastroenterology. 1983 May;84(5 Pt 1):893–901. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brand D. L., Martin D., Pope C. E., 2nd Esophageal manometrics in patients with angina-like chest pain. Am J Dig Dis. 1977 Apr;22(4):300–304. doi: 10.1007/BF01072186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Castell J. A., Dalton C. B., Castell D. O. On-line computer analysis of human lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Am J Physiol. 1988 Dec;255(6 Pt 1):G794–G799. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1988.255.6.G794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clouse R. E., Staiano A., Landau D. W., Schlachter J. L. Manometric findings during spontaneous chest pain in patients with presumed esophageal "spasms". Gastroenterology. 1983 Aug;85(2):395–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davies H. A., Kaye M. D., Rhodes J., Dart A. M., Henderson A. H. Diagnosis of oesophageal spasm by ergometrine provocation. Gut. 1982 Feb;23(2):89–97. doi: 10.1136/gut.23.2.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dodds W. J., Hogan W. J., Reid D. P., Stewart E. T., Arndorfer R. C. A comparison between primary esophageal peristalsis following wet and dry swallows. J Appl Physiol. 1973 Dec;35(6):851–857. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1973.35.6.851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hollis J. B., Castell D. O. Effect of dry swallows and wet swallows of different volumes on esophageal peristalsis. J Appl Physiol. 1975 Jun;38(6):1161–1164. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1975.38.6.1161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Howard P. J., Pryde A., Heading R. C. Oesophageal manometry during eating in the investigation of patients with chest pain or dysphagia. Gut. 1989 Sep;30(9):1179–1186. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.9.1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. London R. L., Ouyang A., Snape W. J., Jr, Goldberg S., Hirshfeld J. W., Jr, Cohen S. Provocation of esophageal pain by ergonovine or edrophonium. Gastroenterology. 1981 Jul;81(1):10–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mellow M. H. Esophageal motility during food ingestion: a physiologic test of esophageal motor function. Gastroenterology. 1983 Sep;85(3):570–577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Meyer G. W., Gerhardt D. C., Castell D. O. Human esophageal response to rapid swallowing: muscle refractory period or neural inhibition? Am J Physiol. 1981 Aug;241(2):G129–G136. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1981.241.2.G129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Richter J. E., Wu W. C., Johns D. N., Blackwell J. N., Nelson J. L., 3rd, Castell J. A., Castell D. O. Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers. Variability of pressures with age and frequency of "abnormal" contractions. Dig Dis Sci. 1987 Jun;32(6):583–592. doi: 10.1007/BF01296157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sears V. W., Jr, Castell J. A., Castell D. O. Comparison of effects of upright versus supine body position and liquid versus solid bolus on esophageal pressures in normal humans. Dig Dis Sci. 1990 Jul;35(7):857–864. doi: 10.1007/BF01536799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vanek A. W., Diamant N. E. Responses of the human esophagus to paired swallows. Gastroenterology. 1987 Mar;92(3):643–650. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90012-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. de Caestecker J. S., Blackwell J. N., Brown J., Heading R. C. The oesophagus as a cause of recurrent chest pain: which patients should be investigated and which tests should be used? Lancet. 1985 Nov 23;2(8465):1143–1146. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92676-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. de Caestecker J. S. Twenty-four-hour oesophageal pH monitoring: advances and controversies. Neth J Med. 1989 Mar;34 (Suppl):S20–S39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES