Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
. 1989 Jun;27(6):723–739. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1989.tb03434.x

The benefits of prescription information leaflets (1).

S Gibbs 1, W E Waters 1, C F George 1
PMCID: PMC1379799  PMID: 2569323

Abstract

1. Prescription information leaflets (PILs) giving information about non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and inhaled bronchodilators were evaluated in three small Hampshire towns, while a fourth, in which no leaflets were distributed, acted as a control. 2. Seven hundred and nineteen (82%) patients prescribed one of these medicines agreed to be interviewed in their homes, 1 to 2 weeks after the medicine had been prescribed. Four hundred and nineteen of them had received leaflets, while 300 received no written information. Two hundred and sixty patients received their leaflets from a pharmacist while 159 were given them by their general practitioner. 3. Patients who received leaflets were better informed about every item of knowledge tested, except for the name of the medicine. Awareness of the side effects showed the greatest improvement, but there was no evidence that these leaflets produced spurious side effects. 4. Much improved levels of satisfaction were recorded amongst patients who received leaflets, especially those for NSAIDs (P less than 0.001) and for beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (P less than 0.01). 5. Subsequently, three hundred and fifty-eight (77%) of the patients prescribed either a NSAID or a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist 1 year earlier responded to a postal questionnaire. The benefits in terms of knowledge and satisfaction were still apparent, although less marked than previously. Of the patients still taking beta-adrenoceptor antagonists 70% had retained their leaflets over the intervening 12 months. 6. Ninety-seven per cent of patients read their leaflet regardless of whether it was distributed by a general practitioner or pharmacist. However, those who obtained it from a pharmacist tended to be more knowledgeable and satisfied. 7. We conclude that patients welcome the idea of receiving PILs. They improve patients' knowledge of how to take their medicines correctly and their awareness of potential side effects. Importantly, patients who receive leaflets are more satisfied than those who do not. These overall benefits justify the use of leaflets on a routine basis.

Full text

PDF
723

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Becker M. H., Maiman L. A. Sociobehavioral determinants of compliance with health and medical care recommendations. Med Care. 1975 Jan;13(1):10–24. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197501000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyle C. M. Difference between patients' and doctors' interpretation of some common medical terms. Br Med J. 1970 May 2;2(5704):286–289. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5704.286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burney P. G., Britton J. R., Chinn S., Tattersfield A. E., Papacosta A. O., Kelson M. C., Anderson F., Corfield D. R. Descriptive epidemiology of bronchial reactivity in an adult population: results from a community study. Thorax. 1987 Jan;42(1):38–44. doi: 10.1136/thx.42.1.38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charlton J. R., Hartley R. M., Silver R., Holland W. W. Geographical variation in mortality from conditions amenable to medical intervention in England and Wales. Lancet. 1983 Mar 26;1(8326 Pt 1):691–696. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91981-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark C. M., Bayley E. W. Evaluation of the use of programmed instruction for patients maintained on Warfarin therapy. Am J Public Health. 1972 Aug;62(8):1135–1139. doi: 10.2105/ajph.62.8.1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Conrad P. The meaning of medications: another look at compliance. Soc Sci Med. 1985;20(1):29–37. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90308-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. George C. F., Waters W. E., Nicholas J. A. Prescription information leaflets: a pilot study in general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Oct 22;287(6400):1193–1196. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6400.1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gordis L., Markowitz M., Lilienfeld A. M. The inaccuracy in using interviews to estimate patient reliability in taking medications at home. Med Care. 1969 Jan-Feb;7(1):49–54. doi: 10.1097/00005650-196901000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gotsch A. R., Liguori S. Knowledge, attitude, and compliance dimensions of antibiotic therapy with PPIs: A community pharmacy-based study. Med Care. 1982 Jun;20(6):581–595. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198206000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hermann F., Herxheimer A., Lionel N. D. Package inserts for prescribed medicines: what minimum information do patients need? Br Med J. 1978 Oct 21;2(6145):1132–1135. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6145.1132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hulka B. S., Cassel J. C., Kupper L. L., Burdette J. A. Communication, compliance, and concordance between physicians and patients with prescribed medications. Am J Public Health. 1976 Sep;66(9):847–853. doi: 10.2105/ajph.66.9.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kincey J., Bradshaw P., Ley P. Patients' satisfaction and reported acceptance of advice in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1975 Aug;25(157):558–566. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Korsch B. M., Gozzi E. K., Francis V. Gaps in doctor-patient communication. 1. Doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics. 1968 Nov;42(5):855–871. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Larsen D. E., Rootman I. Physician role performance and patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med. 1976 Jan;10(1):29–32. doi: 10.1016/0037-7856(76)90136-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ley P., Jain V. K., Skilbeck C. E. A method for decreasing patients' medication errors. Psychol Med. 1976 Nov;6(4):599–601. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700018237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ley P. Memory for medical information. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1979 Jun;18(2):245–255. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1979.tb00333.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ley P. Satisfaction, compliance and communication. Br J Clin Psychol. 1982 Nov;21(Pt 4):241–254. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1982.tb00562.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McMahon T., Clark C. M., Bailie G. R. Who provides patients with drug information? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Feb 7;294(6568):355–356. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6568.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Morris L. A., Halperin J. A. Effects of written drug information on patient knowledge and compliance: a literature review. Am J Public Health. 1979 Jan;69(1):47–52. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Morris L. A., Mazis M., Gordon E. A survey of the effects of oral contraceptive patient information. JAMA. 1977 Dec 5;238(23):2504–2508. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Myers E. D., Calvert E. J. Information, compliance and side-effects: a study of patients on antidepressant medication. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1984 Jan;17(1):21–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1984.tb04993.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Myers E. D., Calvert E. J. Knowledge of side effects and perseverance with medication. Br J Psychiatry. 1978 May;132:526–527. doi: 10.1192/bjp.132.5.526b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Myers E. D., Calvert E. J. The effect of forewarning on the occurrence of side-effects and discontinuance of medication in patients on amitriptyline. Br J Psychiatry. 1973 Apr;122(569):461–464. doi: 10.1192/bjp.122.4.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Myers E. D., Calvert E. J. The effect of forewarning on the occurrence of side-effects and discontinuance of medication in patients on dothiepin. J Int Med Res. 1976;4(4):237–240. doi: 10.1177/030006057600400405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Richards N. D. Methods and effectiveness of health education: the past, present and future of social scientific involvement. Soc Sci Med. 1975 Mar;9(3):141–156. doi: 10.1016/0037-7856(75)90051-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ridout S., Waters W. E., George C. F. Knowledge of and attitudes to medicines in the Southampton community. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1986 Jun;21(6):701–712. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1986.tb05236.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sackett D. L., Haynes R. B., Gibson E. S., Hackett B. C., Taylor D. W., Roberts R. S., Johnson A. L. Randomised clinical trial of strategies for improving medication compliance in primary hypertension. Lancet. 1975 May 31;1(7918):1205–1207. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92192-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith W. C., Crombie I. K., Campion P. D., Knox J. D. Comparison of response rates to a postal questionnaire from a general practice and a research unit. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Nov 23;291(6507):1483–1485. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6507.1483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Udkow G. P., Lasagna L., Weintraub M., Tamoshunas Z. The safety and efficacy of the estrogen patient package insert. A questionnaire study. JAMA. 1979 Aug 10;242(6):536–539. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Waitzkin H., Stoeckle J. D. Information control and the micropolitics of health care: summary of an ongoing research project. Soc Sci Med. 1976 Jun;10(6):263–276. doi: 10.1016/0037-7856(76)90070-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES