Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1996 Apr;86(4):520–524. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.4.520

Physician use in Ontario and the United States: The impact of socioeconomic status and health status.

S J Katz 1, T P Hofer 1, W G Manning 1
PMCID: PMC1380552  PMID: 8604782

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study compared physician use in Ontario and the midwestern and northeastern United States for persons of different socioeconomic status and health status. The distribution of health problems associated with the most recent physician visit also was compared. METHODS: The design of the study was cross sectional; data derived from the 1990 Ontario Health Survey and the 1990 US National Health Interview Survey were used in analyses. RESULTS: Overall, persons in Ontario averaged 19% more visits than US residents, but differences varied markedly across income and health status. At each level of health status, low- income Canadians had 25% to 33% more visits than their US counterparts. However, among higher income persons, those in excellent or very good health had 22% more visits than Americans, while those in good, fair, or poor health had 10% fewer visits than Americans. Higher visit rates in Ontario were not associated with a greater prevalence of low- priority visits. CONCLUSIONS: Under the Canadian single- payer system, medical care in Ontario has been redistributed to low-income persons and the elderly. Compared with the United States, there has been a lower intensity of medical care for the sick higher income population.

Full text

PDF
520

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aday L. A., Andersen R. M. The national profile of access to medical care: where do we stand? Am J Public Health. 1984 Dec;74(12):1331–1339. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.12.1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson G. M., Grumbach K., Luft H. S., Roos L. L., Mustard C., Brook R. Use of coronary artery bypass surgery in the United States and Canada. Influence of age and income. JAMA. 1993 Apr 7;269(13):1661–1666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Birch S., Eyles J., Newbold K. B. Equitable access to health care: methodological extensions to the analysis of physician utilization in Canada. Health Econ. 1993 Jul;2(2):87–101. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730020203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blendon R. J., Donelan K., Hill C. A., Carter W., Beatrice D., Altman D. Paying medical bills in the United States. Why health insurance isn't enough. JAMA. 1994 Mar 23;271(12):949–951. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cleary P. D., Jette A. M. The validity of self-reported physician utilization measures. Med Care. 1984 Sep;22(9):796–803. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198409000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Enterline P. E., Salter V., McDonald A. D., McDonald J. C. The distribution of medical services before and after "free" medical care--the Quebec experience. N Engl J Med. 1973 Nov 29;289(22):1174–1178. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197311292892206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fuchs V. R., Hahn J. S. How does Canada do it? A comparison of expenditures for physicians' services in the United States and Canada. N Engl J Med. 1990 Sep 27;323(13):884–890. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199009273231306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Idler E. L., Kasl S. V., Lemke J. H. Self-evaluated health and mortality among the elderly in New Haven, Connecticut, and Iowa and Washington counties, Iowa, 1982-1986. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Jan;131(1):91–103. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lazenby H. C., Levit K. R., Waldo D. R., Adler G. S., Letsch S. W., Cowan C. A. National health accounts: lessons from the U.S. experience. Health Care Financ Rev. 1992 Summer;13(4):89–103. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mark D. B., Naylor C. D., Hlatky M. A., Califf R. M., Topol E. J., Granger C. B., Knight J. D., Nelson C. L., Lee K. L., Clapp-Channing N. E. Use of medical resources and quality of life after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and the United States. N Engl J Med. 1994 Oct 27;331(17):1130–1135. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199410273311706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McDonald A. D., McDonald J. C., Salter V., Enterline P. E. Effects of Qubec Medicare on physician consultation for selected symptoms. N Engl J Med. 1974 Sep 26;291(13):649–652. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197409262911304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mossey J. M., Shapiro E. Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly. Am J Public Health. 1982 Aug;72(8):800–808. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.8.800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rouleau J. L., Moyé L. A., Pfeffer M. A., Arnold J. M., Bernstein V., Cuddy T. E., Dagenais G. R., Geltman E. M., Goldman S., Gordon D. A comparison of management patterns after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and the United States. The SAVE investigators. N Engl J Med. 1993 Mar 18;328(11):779–784. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199303183281108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shapiro M. F., Ware J. E., Jr, Sherbourne C. D. Effects of cost sharing on seeking care for serious and minor symptoms. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Feb;104(2):246–251. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Siemiatycki J., Richardson L., Pless I. B. Equality in medical care under national health insurance in Montreal. N Engl J Med. 1980 Jul 3;303(1):10–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198007033030103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Welch W. P., Katz S. J., Zuckerman S. Physician fee levels: Medicare versus Canada. Health Care Financ Rev. 1993 Spring;14(3):41–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES