Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1997 Jun;87(6):998–1002. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.6.998

Determining injury at work on the California death certificate.

C Peek-Asa 1, D L McArthur 1, J F Kraus 1
PMCID: PMC1380937  PMID: 9224183

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined decisions of California Country Coroner's offices in determining injury at work and identified factors influencing this decision. METHODS: Surveys were sent to California County Coroner's offices (response rate = 93%). The survey included 23 vignettes that required the respondent to determine whether the fatality involved an injury at work. The Rasch method was used to determine internal consistency in endorsing vignettes and to determine overall endorsability of vignettes based on underlying factors. RESULTS: Respondents showed internal consistency but much disagreement in their endorsement of vignettes. Decedents who were performing paid work or were on their work site during working hours were almost unanimously endorsed as having incurred an injury at work. Non-payment, travel/transportation, suicide, and nontraditional work sites and work hours led to disagreement and uncertainty among respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Coroners have different methods of determining injury at work on the death certificate, and available guidelines do not define many of the ambiguous situations encountered by coroners.

Full text

PDF
998

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Houck P., Milham S., Jr Quality of death certificate occupation data for a cohort of aluminum industry workers. J Occup Med. 1992 Feb;34(2):173–175. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199202000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kozlowski L. T. Evidence for limits on the acceptability of lowest-tar cigarettes. Am J Public Health. 1989 Feb;79(2):198–199. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.2.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kraus J. F., Peek C., Silberman T., Anderson C. The accuracy of death certificates in identifying work-related fatal injuries. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 May 15;141(10):973–979. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McLaughlin J. K., Mehl E. S. A comparison of occupational data from death certificates and interviews. Am J Ind Med. 1991;20(3):335–342. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700200306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Olsen G. W., Brondum J., Bodner K. M., Kravat B. A., Mandel J. S., Mandel J. H., Bond G. G. Occupation and industry on death certificates of long-term chemical workers: concordance with work history records. Am J Ind Med. 1990;17(4):465–481. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700170405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Runyan C. W., Loomis D., Butts J. Practices of county medical examiners in classifying deaths as on the job. J Occup Med. 1994 Jan;36(1):36–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Russell J., Conroy C. Representativeness of deaths identified through the injury-at-work item on the death certificate: implications for surveillance. Am J Public Health. 1991 Dec;81(12):1613–1618. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.12.1613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stout N., Bell C. Effectiveness of source documents for identifying fatal occupational injuries: a synthesis of studies. Am J Public Health. 1991 Jun;81(6):725–728. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.6.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES