Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1997 Aug;87(8):1367–1374. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.8.1367

Mandatory parental involvement in minors' abortions: effects of the laws in Minnesota, Missouri, and Indiana.

C Ellertson 1
PMCID: PMC1381104  PMID: 9279279

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effects of parental involvement laws on the birth rate, in-state abortion rate, odds of interstate travel, and odds of late abortion for minors. METHODS: Poisson and logistic regression models fitted to vital records compared the periods before and after the laws were enforced. RESULTS: In each state, the in-state abortion rate for minors fell (relative to the rate for older women) when parental involvement laws took effect. Data offered no empirical support for the proposition that the laws drive up birth rates for minors. Although data were incomplete, the laws appeared to increase the odds of a minor's traveling out of state for her abortion. If one judges from the available data, minors who traveled out of state may have accounted for the entire observed decline in the in-state abortion rate, at least in Missouri. The laws appeared to delay minors' abortions past the eighth week, but probably not into the second trimester. CONCLUSIONS: Several empirical arguments used against and in support of parental involvement laws do not appear to be substantiated.

Full text

PDF
1367

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blum R. W., Resnick M. D., Stark T. A. The impact of a parental notification law on adolescent abortion decision-making. Am J Public Health. 1987 May;77(5):619–620. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.5.619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blum R. W., Resnick M. D., Stark T. Factors associated with the use of court bypass by minors to obtain abortions. Fam Plann Perspect. 1990 Jul-Aug;22(4):158–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cartoof V. G., Klerman L. V. Parental consent for abortion: impact of the Massachusetts law. Am J Public Health. 1986 Apr;76(4):397–400. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.4.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Donovan P. Judging teenagers: how minors fare when they seek court-authorized abortions. Fam Plann Perspect. 1983 Nov-Dec;15(6):259–267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Henshaw S. K., Kost K. Parental involvement in minors' abortion decisions. Fam Plann Perspect. 1992 Sep-Oct;24(5):196-207, 213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rogers J. L., Boruch R. F., Stoms G. B., DeMoya D. Impact of the Minnesota Parental Notification Law on abortion and birth. Am J Public Health. 1991 Mar;81(3):294–298. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.3.294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rogers James L., Miller Amy M. Inner-city birth rates following enactment of the Minnesota Parental Notification Law. Law Hum Behav. 1993 Feb;17(1):27–42. doi: 10.1007/BF01044535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stone R., Waszak C. Adolescent knowledge and attitudes about abortion. Fam Plann Perspect. 1992 Mar-Apr;24(2):52–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES