Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
. 1992 Oct;34(4):289–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1992.tb05633.x

The use of microcomputer-based psychomotor tests for the evaluation of benzodiazepine effects on human performance: a review with emphasis on temazepam.

G W Kunsman 1, J E Manno 1, B R Manno 1, C M Kunsman 1, M A Przekop 1
PMCID: PMC1381408  PMID: 1457261

Abstract

1. The literature relating to the effects of benzodiazepines in general, and temazepam in particular, on human psychomotor performance as assessed using microcomputer-based testing batteries is surveyed. 2. The adverse effects of central nervous system depressants on performance is an important mediocolegal issue and frequently comes into question in on-the-road and on-the-job accidents. The use of microcomputer-based testing batteries allows for performance evaluation both in the laboratory and at-the-scene, as well as providing the opportunity to model a large number of different behaviours required in routine yet complex psychomotor tasks. 3. The conclusions in general are: (1) The benzodiazepines as a class of drugs impair both cognitive and motor performance. These effects are often subtle when low doses are involved or when testing occurs the morning following evening administration of the medication. (2) No single psychomotor task adequately simulates complex daily tasks such as automobile driving. A battery of tests that evaluates a number of the components of such tasks is necessary to determine adequately the full range of effects of these medications.

Full text

PDF
289

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Balter M. B., Manheimer D. I., Mellinger G. D., Uhlenhuth E. H. A cross-national comparison of anti-anxiety/sedative drug use. Curr Med Res Opin. 1984;8 (Suppl 4):5–20. doi: 10.1185/03007998409109541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Betts T. A., Birtle J. Effect of two hypnotic drugs on actual driving performance next morning. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Sep 25;285(6345):852–852. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6345.852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Betts T. A., Clayton A. B., Mackay G. M. Effects of four commonly-used tranquillizers on low-speed driving performance tests. Br Med J. 1972 Dec 9;4(5840):580–584. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5840.580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bittencourt P. R., Wade P., Smith A. T., Richens A. The relationship between peak velocity of saccadic eye movements and serum benzodiazepine concentration. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1981 Oct;12(4):523–533. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1981.tb01261.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Breimer D. D. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of various benzodiazepines used as hypnotics. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979;8(1):7S–13S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1979.tb00449.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brookhuis K. A., Volkerts E. R., O'Hanlon J. F. Repeated dose effects of lormetazepam and flurazepam upon driving performance. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;39(1):83–87. doi: 10.1007/BF02657065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chernik D. A., Johnson L. C., Kanitra L. Sleep, performance, and plasma levels in chronic insomniacs during 14-day use of flurazepam and midazolam: methodology. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990 Aug;10(4 Suppl):10S–19S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199008001-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Clausen T. G., Wolff J., Carl P., Theilgaard A. The effect of the benzodiazepine antagonist, flumazenil, on psychometric performance in acute ethanol intoxication in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;38(3):233–236. doi: 10.1007/BF00315022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clayton A. B. The effects of psychotropic drugs upon driving-related skills. Hum Factors. 1976 Jun;18(3):241–252. doi: 10.1177/001872087601800305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dunbar G. C., Perera M. H., Jenner F. A. Patterns of benzodiazepine use in Great Britain as measured by a general population survey. Br J Psychiatry. 1989 Dec;155:836–841. doi: 10.1192/bjp.155.6.836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellinwood E., Linnoila M., Marsh G. Plasma concentrations of flurazepam and midazolam in chronic insomniacs during 14-day use and their relationship to therapeutic effects and next-day performance and mood. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990 Aug;10(4 Suppl):68S–75S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis P., Carney M. W. Benzodiazepine abuse and management of anxiety in the community. Int J Addict. 1988 Oct;23(10):1083–1090. doi: 10.3109/10826088809056187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Erwin C. W., Linnoila M., Hartwell J., Erwin A., Guthrie S. Effects of buspirone and diazepam, alone and in combination with alcohol, on skilled performance and evoked potentials. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1986 Aug;6(4):199–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Evans M. A., Martz R., Rodda B. E., Kiplinger G. F., Forney R. B. Quantitative relationship between blood alcohol concentration and psychomotor performance. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1974 Mar;15(3):253–260. doi: 10.1002/cpt1974153253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Eves F. F., Curran H. V., Shine P., Lader M. H. The effects on memory of pipequaline, alone or in combination with diazepam. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1988;95(3):386–389. doi: 10.1007/BF00181953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Eves F. F., Lader M. H. The effects of alcohol on psychological functions in normal volunteers after 8 days' treatment with pipequaline (PK 8165), diazepam or placebo. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1989;36(1):47–52. doi: 10.1007/BF00561022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. FORNEY R. B., HUGHES F. W., GREATBATCH W. H. MEASUREMENT OF ATTENTIVE MOTOR PERFORMANCE AFTER ALCOHOL. Percept Mot Skills. 1964 Aug;19:151–154. doi: 10.2466/pms.1964.19.1.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ferslew K. E., Manno J. E., Manno B. R., Vekovius W. A., Hubbard J. M., Bairnsfather L. E. Pursuit Meter II, a computer-based device for testing pursuit-tracking performance. Percept Mot Skills. 1982 Jun;54(3):779–784. doi: 10.2466/pms.1982.54.3.779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fisch H. U., Baktir G., Karlaganis G., Minder C., Bircher J. Excessive motor impairment two hours after triazolam in the elderly. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;38(3):229–232. doi: 10.1007/BF00315021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Forrest P., Galletly D. C. A double-blind comparative study of three formulations of diazepam in volunteers. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1988 May;16(2):158–163. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8801600205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Freishtat H. W. View from the Nation's Courts. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1988 Dec;8(6):434–436. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fuccella L. M. Bioavailability of temazepam in soft gelatin capsules. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979;8(1):31S–35S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1979.tb00452.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Garriott J. C., Latman N. Drug detection in cases of "driving under the influence". J Forensic Sci. 1976 Apr;21(2):398–415. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gorenstein C., Tavares S. M., Gentil V., Peres C., Moreno R. A., Dreyfus J. F. Psychophysiological effects and dose equivalence of zopiclone and triazolam administered to healthy volunteers. Methodological considerations. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1990;23(10):941–951. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Greenblatt D. J., Harmatz J. S., Engelhardt N., Shader R. I. Pharmacokinetic determinants of dynamic differences among three benzodiazepine hypnotics. Flurazepam, temazepam, and triazolam. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Apr;46(4):326–332. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810040032006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Griffiths A. N., Tedeschi G., Richens A. The effects of repeated doses of temazepam and nitrazepam on several measures of human performance. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1986;332:119–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1986.tb08988.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Griffiths R. R., Wolf B. Relative abuse liability of different benzodiazepines in drug abusers. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990 Aug;10(4):237–243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. HUGHES F. W., FORNEY R. B. COMPARATIVE EFFECT OF THREE ANTIHISTAMINICS AND ETHANOL ON MENTAL AND MOTOR PERFORMANCE. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1964 Jul-Aug;5:414–421. doi: 10.1002/cpt196454414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hallstrom C. Uses and abuses of benzodiazepines. Br J Hosp Med. 1989 Feb;41(2):115–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hindmarch I. A 1,4-benzodiazepine, temazepam (K 3917), its effect on some psychological parameters of sleep and behaviour. Arzneimittelforschung. 1975 Nov;25(11):1836–1839. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hindmarch I. A sub-chronic study of the subjective quality of sleep and psychological measures of performance on the morning following night time medication with temazepam. Arzneimittelforschung. 1976;26(11):2113–2115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hindmarch I. Effects of hypnotic and sleep-inducing drugs on objective assessments of human psychomotor performance and subjective appraisals of sleep and early morning behaviour. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979;8(1):43S–46S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1979.tb00455.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hindmarch I. Psychomotor function and psychoactive drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1980 Sep;10(3):189–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb01745.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hindmarch I. The effects of the sub-chronic administration of an anti-histamine, clemastine, on tests of car driving ability and psychomotor performance. Curr Med Res Opin. 1976;4(3):197–206. doi: 10.1185/03007997609109303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hoehn-Saric R., McLeod D. R. Physiological and performance responses to diazepam: two types of effects. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1986;22(2):439–443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Honkanen R., Ertama L., Linnoila M., Alha A., Lukkari I., Karlsson M., Kiviluoto O., Puro M. Role of drugs in traffic accidents. Br Med J. 1980 Nov 15;281(6251):1309–1312. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6251.1309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jansen A. A., de Gier J. J., Slangen J. L. Diazepam-induced changes in signal detection performance. A comparison with the effects on the Critical Flicker-Fusion Frequency and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test. Neuropsychobiology. 1986;16(4):193–197. doi: 10.1159/000118325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Johnson L. C., Chernik D. A., Sateia M. J. Sleep, performance, and plasma levels in chronic insomniacs during 14-day use of flurazepam and midazolam: an introduction. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990 Aug;10(4 Suppl):5S–9S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Judd L. L., Ellinwood E., McAdams L. A. Cognitive performance and mood in patients with chronic insomnia during 14-day use of flurazepam and midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990 Aug;10(4 Suppl):56S–67S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kennedy R. S., Baltzley D. R., Wilkes R. L., Kuntz L. A. Psychology of computer use: IX. A menu of self-administered microcomputer-based neurotoxicology tests. Percept Mot Skills. 1989 Jun;68(3 Pt 2):1255–1272. doi: 10.2466/pms.1989.68.3c.1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kennedy R. S., Wilkes R. L., Dunlap W. P., Kuntz L. A. Development of an automated performance test system for environmental and behavioral toxicology studies. Percept Mot Skills. 1987 Dec;65(3):947–962. doi: 10.2466/pms.1987.65.3.947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Koelega H. S. Benzodiazepines and vigilance performance: a review. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1989;98(2):145–156. doi: 10.1007/BF00444684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kroboth P. D., Smith R. B., Erb R. J. Tolerance to alprazolam after intravenous bolus and continuous infusion: psychomotor and EEG effects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1988 Mar;43(3):270–277. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1988.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Krueger H. Comparison of the effect of flurazepam, brotizolam and alcohol on psychomotor performance. Arzneimittelforschung. 1986 Mar;36(3A):616–620. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kuitunen T., Mattila M. J., Seppälä T., Aranko K., Mattila M. E. Actions of zopiclone and carbamazepine, alone and in combination, on human skilled performance in laboratory and clinical tests. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1990 Sep;30(3):453–461. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1990.tb03797.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Laurell H., Törnros J. The carry-over effects of triazolam compared with nitrazepam and placebo in acute emergency driving situations and in monotonous simulated driving. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh) 1986 Mar;58(3):182–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1986.tb00092.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Leigh T. J., Link C. G., Fell G. L. Effects of granisetron and lorazepam, alone and in combination, on psychometric performance. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1991 Mar;31(3):333–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1991.tb05537.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lery N., Rouzioux M. N., Roussot J. F., Claudel S. Interactions between alcohol and drugs. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1982 Dec;24(6):427–434. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Linnoila M., Erwin C. W., Brendle A., Logue P. Effects of alcohol and flunitrazepam on mood and performance in healthy young men. J Clin Pharmacol. 1981 Oct;21(10):430–435. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1981.tb01745.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Linnoila M., Häkkinen S. Effects of diazepam and codeine, alone and in combination with alcohol, on simulated driving. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1974 Apr;15(4):368–373. doi: 10.1002/cpt1974154368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Linnoila M., Mattila M. J. Proceedings: Drug interaction on driving skills as evaluated by laboratory tests and by a driving simulator. Pharmakopsychiatr Neuropsychopharmakol. 1973 Mar;6(2):127–132. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1094375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Linnoila M., Saario I., Maki M. Effect of treatment with diazepam or lithium and alcohol on psychomotor skills related to driving. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1974 Aug 23;7(5):337–342. doi: 10.1007/BF00558202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Linnoila M., Stapleton J. M., Lister R., Moss H., Lane E., Granger A., Eckardt M. J. Effects of single doses of alprazolam and diazepam, alone and in combination with ethanol, on psychomotor and cognitive performance and on autonomic nervous system reactivity in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;39(1):21–28. doi: 10.1007/BF02657051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Manno J. E., Kiplinger G. F., Scholz N., Forney R. B. The influence of alcohol and marihuana on motor and mental performance. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1971 Mar-Apr;12(2):202–211. doi: 10.1002/cpt1971122part1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Mattila M. J., Mattila M., Aranko K. Objective and subjective assessments of the effects of flupentixol and benzodiazepines on human psychomotor performance. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1988;95(3):323–328. doi: 10.1007/BF00181941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Mattila M. Acute and subacute effects of diazepam on human performance: comparison of plain tablet and controlled release capsule. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1988 Nov;63(5):369–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1988.tb00970.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Mattila M., Seppälä T., Mattila M. J. Combined effects of buspirone and diazepam on objective and subjective tests of performance in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1986 Dec;40(6):620–626. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1986.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. McLeod D. R., Hoehn-Saric R., Labib A. S., Greenblatt D. J. Six weeks of diazepam treatment in normal women: effects on psychomotor performance and psychophysiology. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1988 Apr;8(2):83–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Mellinger G. D., Balter M. B., Uhlenhuth E. H. Anti-anxiety agents: duration of use and characteristics of users in the U.S.A. Curr Med Res Opin. 1984;8 (Suppl 4):21–36. doi: 10.1185/03007998409109542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Missak S. S. Do alcoholics have abnormal benzodiazepine receptors? Med Hypotheses. 1990 May;32(1):59–60. doi: 10.1016/0306-9877(90)90069-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Moskowitz H. Attention tasks as skills performance measures of drug effects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;18 (Suppl 1):51S–61S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1984.tb02582.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Nazareth I. D., King M. B. Prescribing of benzodiazepines by casualty officers. J R Soc Med. 1989 May;82(5):276–277. doi: 10.1177/014107688908200510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Nicholson A. N. Differential effects of the 1,4 and 1,5 benzodiazepines on performance in healthy man. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979;7 (Suppl 1):83S–84S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1979.tb04670.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Nikaido A. M., Ellinwood E. H., Jr Comparison of the effects of quazepam and triazolam on cognitive-neuromotor performance. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1987;92(4):459–464. doi: 10.1007/BF00176478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Orzack M. H., Friedman L., Dessain E., Bird M., Beake B., McEachern J., Cole J. O. Comparative study of the abuse liability of alprazolam, lorazepam, diazepam, methaqualone, and placebo. Int J Addict. 1988 May;23(5):449–467. doi: 10.3109/10826088809039211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Patat A., Klein M. J., Hucher M., Granier J. Acute effects of amitriptyline on human performance and interactions with diazepam. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988;35(6):585–592. doi: 10.1007/BF00637593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Preston G. C., Broks P., Traub M., Ward C., Poppleton P., Stahl S. M. Effects of lorazepam on memory, attention and sedation in man. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1988;95(2):208–215. doi: 10.1007/BF00174511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Reitan J. A., Porter W., Braunstein M. Comparison of psychomotor skills and amnesia after induction of anesthesia with midazolam or thiopental. Anesth Analg. 1986 Sep;65(9):933–937. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Rettig H. C., de Haan P., Zuurmond W. W., von Leeuwen L. Effects of hypnotics on sleep and psychomotor performance. A double-blind randomised study of lormetazepam, midazolam and zopiclone. Anaesthesia. 1990 Dec;45(12):1079–1082. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14896.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Roache J. D., Cherek D. R., Spiga R., Bennett R. H., Cowan K. A., Yingling J. Benzodiazepine-induced impairment of matching-to-sample performance in humans. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990 Aug;36(4):945–952. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90104-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Roache J. D., Griffiths R. R. Lorazepam and meprobamate dose effects in humans: behavioral effects and abuse liability. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987 Dec;243(3):978–988. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Roth T., Piccione P., Salis P., Kramer M., Kaffeman M. Effects of temazepam, flurazepam and quinalbarbitone on sleep: psychomotor and cognitive function. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979;8(1):47S–54S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1979.tb00456.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Schaffler K., Klausnitzer W. Placebo-controlled study on acute and subchronic effects of buspirone vs bromazepam utilizing psychomotor and cognitive assessments in healthy volunteers. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1989 Jan;22(1):26–33. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1014573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Schmidt U., Brendemühl D., Rüther E. Aspects of driving after hypnotic therapy with particular reference to temazepam. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1986;332:112–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1986.tb08987.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Seppälä K., Korttila K., Häkkinen S., Linnoila M. Residual effects and skills related to driving after a single oral administration of diazepam, medazepam or lorazepam. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1976 Oct;3(5):831–841. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1976.tb00635.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Skegg D. C., Richards S. M., Doll R. Minor tranquillisers and road accidents. Br Med J. 1979 Apr 7;1(6168):917–919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6168.917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Smiley A., Moskowitz H. Effects of long-term administration of buspirone and diazepam on driver steering control. Am J Med. 1986 Mar 31;80(3B):22–29. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90328-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Smith R. B., Kroboth P. D. Influence of dosing regimen on alprazolam and metabolite serum concentrations and tolerance to sedative and psychomotor effects. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1987;93(1):105–112. doi: 10.1007/BF02439595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Sostmann H. J., Sostmann H., Crevoisier C., Bircher J. Dose equivalence of midazolam and triazolam. A psychometric study based on flicker sensitivity, reaction time and digit symbol substitution test. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1989;36(2):181–187. doi: 10.1007/BF00609192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Stanley R. O., Tiller J. W., Adrian J. The psychomotor effects of single and repeated doses of hypnotic benzodiazepines. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1987 Oct;2(4):317–323. doi: 10.1097/00004850-198710000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Stevenson G. W., Pathria M. N., Lamping D. L., Buck L., Rosenbloom D. Driving ability after intravenous fentanyl or diazepam. A controlled double-blind study. Invest Radiol. 1986 Sep;21(9):717–719. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198609000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Stoller K. P., Belleville J. P., Bellville J. W. Visual tracking following lorazepam or pentobarbital. Anesthesiology. 1976 Nov;45(5):565–568. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Subhan Z., Harrison C., Hindmarch I. Alprazolam and lorazepam single and multiple-dose effects on psychomotor skills and sleep. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;29(6):709–712. doi: 10.1007/BF00615963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Tazaki T., Tada K., Nogami Y., Takemura N., Ishikawa K. Effects of butoctamide hydrogen succinate and nitrazepam on psychomotor function and EEG in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1989;97(3):370–375. doi: 10.1007/BF00439453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Tuomainen P. A methodological comparison of two formulations of temazepam in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1989 Jan;64(1):28–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1989.tb00595.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Törnros J., Laurell H. Acute and carry-over effects of brotizolam compared to nitrazepam and placebo in monotonous simulated driving. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1990 Jul;67(1):77–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1990.tb00786.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Warot D., Bensimon G., Danjou P., Puech A. J. Comparative effects of zopiclone, triazolam and placebo on memory and psychomotor performance in healthy volunteers. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 1987;1(2):145–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.1987.tb00553.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wittenborn J. R. Effects of benzodiazepines on psychomotor performance. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979;7 (Suppl 1):61S–67S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1979.tb04667.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Wittenborn J. R., Flaherty C. F., Jr, McGough W. E., Nash R. J. Psychomotor changes during initial day of benzodiazepine medication. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979;7 (Suppl 1):69S–76S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1979.tb04668.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Wolf B., Grohmann R., Biber D., Brenner P. M., Rüther E. Benzodiazepine abuse and dependence in psychiatric inpatients. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1989 Mar;22(2):54–60. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1014578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Woods J. H., Katz J. L., Winger G. Use and abuse of benzodiazepines. Issues relevant to prescribing. JAMA. 1988 Dec 16;260(23):3476–3480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES