Skip to main content
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 1997 Sep-Oct;112(5):378–385.

Winning against big tobacco. Let's take the time to get it right.

H H Humphrey 3rd 1
PMCID: PMC1381944  PMID: 9323388

Abstract

Three years ago, the state of Minnesota became the second state to sue the tobacco industry for wrongdoing and the first to charge consumer fraud and conspiracy. Together with our co-plaintiff, Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Minnesota, we filed a lawsuit against the six major U.S. cigarette manufacturers, two tobacco trade organizations, and British American Tobacco Industries (BAT), the parent company of Brown and Williamson. Specifically, the lawsuit alleges that the industry defrauded consumers and engaged in false advertising, deceptive practices, and anti-trust violations, including conspiracy to stifle development of safer cigarettes and to conceal information on smoking and health. Many later-filing states patterned complaints after Minnesota's, and virtually all have incorporated some or all of the claims first pled in the Minnesota complaint.

Full text

PDF
378

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Harris J. E. American cigarette manufacturers' ability to pay damages: overview and a rough calculation. Tob Control. 1996 Winter;5(4):292–294. doi: 10.1136/tc.5.4.292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Moore M. C., Mikhail C. J. A new attack on smoking using an old-time remedy. Public Health Rep. 1996 May-Jun;111(3):192–203. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES