Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 1997 May-Jun;112(3):206–211.

Use of a customer satisfaction survey by health care regulators: a tool for total quality management.

N Andrzejewski 1, R T Lagua 1
PMCID: PMC1381992  PMID: 9160054

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a survey of health care providers to determine the quality of service provided by the staff of a regulatory agency; to collect information on provider needs and expectations; to identify perceived and potential problems that need improvement; and to make changes to improve regulatory services. METHODS: The authors surveyed health care providers using a customer satisfaction questionnaire developed in collaboration with a group of providers and a research consultant. The questionnaire contained 20 declarative statements that fell into six quality domains: proficiency, judgment, responsiveness, communication, accommodation, and relevance. A 10% level of dissatisfaction was used as the acceptable performance standard. RESULTS: The survey was mailed to 324 hospitals, nursing homes, home care agencies, hospices, ambulatory care centers, and health maintenance organizations. Fifty-six percent of provider agencies responded; more than half had written comments. The three highest levels of customer satisfaction were in courtesy of regulatory staff (90%), efficient use of onsite time (84%), and respect for provider employees (83%). The three lowest levels of satisfaction were in the judgment domain; only 44% felt that there was consistency among regulatory staff in the interpretation of regulations, only 45% felt that interpretations of regulations were flexible and reasonable, and only 49% felt that regulations were applied objectively. Nine of 20 quality indicators had dissatisfaction ratings of more than 10%; these were considered priorities for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Responses to the survey identified a number of specific areas of concern; these findings are being incorporated into the continuous quality improvement program of the office.

Full text

PDF
206

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berwick D. M. Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 5;320(1):53–56. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901053200110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carr-Hill R. A. The measurement of patient satisfaction. J Public Health Med. 1992 Sep;14(3):236–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cleary P. D., McNeil B. J. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry. 1988 Spring;25(1):25–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen L., Delaney P., Boston P. Listening to the customer: implementing a patient satisfaction measurement system. Gastroenterol Nurs. 1994 Nov-Dec;17(3):110–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DiTomasso R. A., Willard M. The development of a patient satisfaction questionnaire in the ambulatory setting. Fam Med. 1991 Feb;23(2):127–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Glass A. P. Identifying issues important to patients on a hospital satisfaction questionnaire. Psychiatr Serv. 1995 Jan;46(1):83–85. doi: 10.1176/ps.46.1.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gold M., Wooldridge J. Surveying consumer satisfaction to assess managed-care quality: current practices. Health Care Financ Rev. 1995 Summer;16(4):155–173. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones R. B., Carnon A. G., Wylie H., Hedley A. J. How do we measure consumer opinions of outpatient clinics? Public Health. 1993 Jul;107(4):235–241. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80502-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kurata J. H., Nogawa A. N., Phillips D. M., Hoffman S., Werblun M. N. Patient and provider satisfaction with medical care. J Fam Pract. 1992 Aug;35(2):176–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Laferriere R. Client satisfaction with home health care nursing. J Community Health Nurs. 1993;10(2):67–76. doi: 10.1207/s15327655jchn1002_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McLaughlin C. P., Kaluzny A. D. Total quality management in health: making it work. Health Care Manage Rev. 1990 Summer;15(3):7–14. doi: 10.1097/00004010-199001530-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Radovilsky Z. D. Quality improvement: analysis and modeling based on survey results. Qual Assur. 1993 Dec;2(4):364–371. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rost K. The influence of patient participation on satisfaction and compliance. Diabetes Educ. 1989 Mar-Apr;15(2):139–143. doi: 10.1177/014572178901500210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rubin H. R. Patient evaluations of hospital care. A review of the literature. Med Care. 1990 Sep;28(9 Suppl):S3–S9. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199009001-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Speedling E. J., Nizza A. A., Eichhorn S., Rosenberg G., Schnepf P. The consumer survey review process: a pathway to quality. Mt Sinai J Med. 1993 Oct;60(5):399–404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Thompson A. G., Suñol R. Expectations as determinants of patient satisfaction: concepts, theory and evidence. Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Jun;7(2):127–141. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/7.2.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wakefield D. S., Cyphert S. T., Murray J. F., Uden-Holman T., Hendryx M. S., Wakefield B. J., Helms C. M. Understanding patient-centered care in the context of total quality management and continuous quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 Mar;20(3):152–161. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30058-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zviran M. Evaluating user satisfaction in a hospital environment: an exploratory study. Health Care Manage Rev. 1992 Summer;17(3):51–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES