Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
letter
. 2002 Jun;46(6):2058. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.2058-2059.2002

Integration of Integrons in res Sites

Fabio Tosini 1,*
PMCID: PMC138286  PMID: 12019143

In a recent paper on the integrons related to In4, Partridge and colleagues (4) describe an interesting reconstruction, after the insertion of the In28 integron, of a res site located in the Tn1403 transposon. The authors also describe additional cases of integrons that are located in res sites (4). However, I feel that they could have more clearly distinguished between their original findings and those that have been previously published. Specifically, the authors report that the In1 integron of R46 is located in a “putative res site,” yet they make no reference to a study conducted by my colleagues and me that showed the presence of a functional res site overlapping the outer part of the 5′-CS of the In1 integron (6). This res site is recognized by the uvp1 resolvase, and the uvp1 gene is adjacent to In1. We also demonstrated that the resolution site in the 5′-CS can effectively replace the original uvp1 res site. Although there do exist differences between the uvp1 resolvase and “resP” (defined by Partridge and colleagues), these differences are negligible, in that they are limited to two consecutive amino acids, as deduced by a comparison of the sequences (accession numbers gi137185 and gi1688102, respectively). Furthermore, the upstream sequences, specifically, the res site and the 5′-CS of In1, are identical when comparing uvp1 and resP.

Two other papers have pointed out the association between the uvp1 resolvase and the In1 integron, thoroughly analyzing the role played by resolvases in determining the site of transposition (1, 3). Although examples from these reports (i.e., R388 and Tn21) are cited by Partridge and colleagues (4), there arises the problem created by the lack of a single nomenclature in the literature for these genetic elements (integrons and transposons), making it difficult to distinguish truly novel identifications of integron-resolvase associations.

Overall, the data reported over the last few years suggest that the locations of integrons and/or transposons close to resolvase genes are the result of targeted recombinations (1, 3, 6). However, the role of resolvases in determining these events remains to be fully understood. Some experiments clearly show that the presence of resolvase proteins is required for insertions to occur in res sites, although the resolvase catalytic activity does not seem to be necessary, at least in some cases (1). In the case of In28, the insertion was probably mediated by a transposase, since a 5-bp duplication surrounds the insert (4). However, in a recent study on a Tn21-like transposon, the insertion of an integron occurred within a region containing a putative res site without duplication of the target sequence, suggesting that there exist other mechanisms for this insertion (7).

Perhaps a comprehensive view of the characteristics of resolvases could suggest other possible mechanisms for the integron/transposon insertions in res sites. It has been recently demonstrated that the resolvases can effectively mediate DNA integration in a very specific target (5) and also fuse replicons bearing different res sites (2). The latter event produces a hybrid res site similar to the one described in R46 (6). On these grounds, it is conceivable that in some cases resolvases could directly integrate integrons in res sites.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kamali-Moghaddam, M., and L. Sundstrom. 2000. Transposon targeting determined by resolvase. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 186:55-59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kholodii, G. 2001. The shuffling functions of resolvases. Gene 269:121-130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Minakhina, S., G. Kholodii, S. Mindlin, O. Yurieva, and V. Nikiforov. 1999. Tn5053 family transposons are res site hunters sensing plasmidal res sites occupied by cognate resolvases. Mol. Microbiol. 33:1059-1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Partridge, S. R., G. Recchia, H. W. Stokes, and R. M. Hall. 2001. Family of class1 integron related to In4 from Tn1696. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:3014-3020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thorpe, H. M., and M. C. Smith. 1998. In vitro site-specific integration of bacteriophage DNA catalyzed by a recombinase of the resolvase/invertase family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:5505-5510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tosini, F., S. Venanzi, A. Boschi, and P. A. Battaglia. 1998. The uvp1 gene on the R46 plasmid encodes a resolvase that catalyzes site-specific resolution involving the 5′-conserved segment of the adjacent integron In1. Mol. Gen. Genet. 258:404-411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Villa, L., P. Visca, F. Tosini, C., Pezzella, and A. Carattoli. Composite integron array generated by insertion of an ORF 341-type integron within a Tn21-like element. Microb. Drug Resist., in press. [DOI] [PubMed]
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Jun;46(6):2058.

Authors’ Reply

Ruth M Hall 1,2,*, H W Stokes 1,2, Sally R Partridge 1,2

Tosini has claimed that in our recent paper describing the structure of In28 and other integrons related to In4 (7) we have described. “an interesting reconstruction, after the insertion of the In28 integron, of a res site located in the Tn1403 transposon.” We made no such claim and in our view the available data do not support this conclusion. While our paper concentrates on the structure of In28 and related class 1 integrons, we did also describe the location of In28 in the ancestral transposon backbone and claimed that it lies within the resI region of the res site. The original res site can be readily discerned because it aligns well with those of other transposons for which footprint analysis and other experimental evidence is available (see reference 7 for references). Hence, the transposition of In28 into this res site has disrupted and inactivated it and, as stated in our paper, Vézina and Levesque (10) have previously reported experimental evidence that resolution does not occur.

In28 is one of many class 1 integrons that have been transposed to positions in or near res sites. We first noticed that the gene adjacent to the IRi end of class 1 integrons was usually one encoding a resolvase in 1985, when we identified the IRi end of the integron In1 (1) in the sequence adjacent to the resP gene, which we had previously sequenced, in the plasmid R46. The fact that resolvase-encoding genes (tnpR genes) were in an equivalent location in Tn21 and Tn1696 seemed to us to be more than coincidental and since that time we have, as new sequences became available, continuously tracked the identity of the gene present in this location for class 1 integrons. Subsequently, we also tracked this gene for Tn5053 and its relatives, which have inverted repeats closely related to IRi and IRt (4). We found that, with few exceptions, the product of the flanking gene was related to resolvases and invertases, suggesting that the transposition is targeted to locations in or near res sites. This hypothesis was supported by the finding that Tn5053 targets the mrs or res site in RP1 (or RP4, RK2, R18-18) (4), though in this case the gene for the cognate resolvase is not immediately adjacent to the res site. Targeting to the same location in RP1 had previously been reported for the mercury resistance transposon Tn502 (9) and for Tn2521 (8). We have recently reported that Tn2521 is a class 1 integron and that in the transposants isolated by Sinclair and Holloway the integron is located within the res (mrs) site of R18-18 (6). Targeting has recently been demonstrated experimentally using further resolvases and res sites (2, 5). These references are all cited in our papers (6, 7).

It is our view that class 1 integrons that retain both IRi and IRt ends move by a transpositional mechanism similar to that described for Tn5053 (3) and that no further mechanism need be proposed. The more unusual arrangements that are observed occasionally can be readily explained by invoking other well documented events such as deletion adjacent to one IR of the integron or homologous recombination or combinations of such events.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hall, R. M., and C. Vockler. 1987. The region of the IncN plasmid R46 coding for resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, streptomycin/spectinomycin and sulphonamides is closely related to antibiotic resistance segments found in IncW plasmids and in Tn21-like transposons. Nucleic Acids Res. 15:7491-7501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kamali-Moghaddam, M., and L. Sundström. 2000. Transposon targeting determined by resolvase. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 186:55-59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kholodii, G. Y., S. Z. Mindlin, I. A. Bass, O. V. Yurieva, S. V. Minakhina, and V. G. Nikiforov. 1995. Four genes, two end, and a res region are involved in transposition of Tn5053: a paradigm for a novel family of transposons carrying either a mer operon or an integron. Mol. Microbiol. 17:1189-1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kholodii, G. Y., O. V. Yurieva, O. L. Lomovskaya, Z. M. Gorlenko, S. Z. Mindlin, and V. G. Nikiforov. 1993. Tn5053, a mercury resistance transposon with integron's ends. J. Mol. Biol. 230:1103-1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Minakhina, S., G. Kholodii, S. Mindlin, O. Yurieva, and V. Nikiforov. 1999. Tn5053 family transposons are res site hunters sensing plasmidal res sites occupied by cognate resolvases. Mol. Microbiol. 33:1059-1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Partridge, S. R., H. J. Brown, and R. M. Hall. 2002. Characterization and movement of the class 1 integron known as Tn2521 and Tn1405. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1288-1294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Partridge, S. R., G. D. Recchia, H. W. Stokes, and R. M. Hall. 2001. Family of class 1 integrons related to In4 from Tn1696. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:3014-3020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sinclair, M. I., and B. W. Holloway. 1982. A chromosomally located transposon in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 151:569-579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stanisich, V. A., R. Arwas, P. M. Bennett, and F. de la Cruz. 1989. Characterization of Pseudomonas mercury-resistance transposon Tn502, which has a preferred insertion site in RP1. J. Gen. Microbiol. 135:2909-2915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vézina, G., and R. C. Levesque. 1991. Molecular characterization of the class II multiresistance transposable element Tn1403 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:313-321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES