Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Gut logoLink to Gut
. 1996 Apr;38(4):525–527. doi: 10.1136/gut.38.4.525

Relation of number of positive lymph nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma.

C W Wu 1, M C Hsieh 1, S S Lo 1, S H Tsay 1, W Y Lui 1, F K P'eng 1
PMCID: PMC1383108  PMID: 8707081

Abstract

BACKGROUND--No nodal grouping category of gastric cancer has been universally accepted for the grading of the effectiveness of therapeutic regimens. AIMS--To establish an appropriate nodal grouping as a forecaster of distant disease and test its validity as a determinant in survival. PATIENTS--Five hundred and ten patients who underwent curative resections for gastric cancer were studied. METHODS--Retrospectively analyse the prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes. RESULTS--A total of 17 176 lymph nodes with an average of 34 per specimen were removed, of which 2811 (16%) showed metastases. Among the 510 patients, 287 (56%) had lymph node metastases, with an average of 9.8 per metastatic case. The survival of all patients was related to their nodal status, an abrupt decrease in survival was seen between 0 and 1 and 4 compared with 5 or more modes while little difference in survival existed among 1, 2, 3, and 4, and among 5, 6, 7, and 8 positive nodes. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of positive nodes (1-4, 5-8 versus > or = 9; relative risk 2.2) and depth of cancer invasion (three levels; relative risk 1.9) were independently correlated with survival. The current nodal stage was not a prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS--Gastric cancer patients with 0, 1 to 4, 5 to 8, and > 9 positive nodes may represent four appropriate prognostic groups and should be adopted for classification of nodal stage in gastric cancer.

Full text

PDF
525

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adachi Y., Kamakura T., Mori M., Baba H., Maehara Y., Sugimachi K. Prognostic significance of the number of positive lymph nodes in gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1994 Mar;81(3):414–416. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arveux P., Faivre J., Boutron M. C., Piard F., Dusserre-Guion L., Monnet E., Hillon P. Prognosis of gastric carcinoma after curative surgery. A population-based study using multivariate crude and relative survival analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 1992 May;37(5):757–763. doi: 10.1007/BF01296435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brodsky J. T., Richard G. K., Cohen A. M., Minsky B. D. Variables correlated with the risk of lymph node metastasis in early rectal cancer. Cancer. 1992 Jan 15;69(2):322–326. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920115)69:2<322::aid-cncr2820690208>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fisher B., Bauer M., Wickerham D. L., Redmond C. K., Fisher E. R., Cruz A. B., Foster R., Gardner B., Lerner H., Margolese R. Relation of number of positive axillary nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer. An NSABP update. Cancer. 1983 Nov 1;52(9):1551–1557. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19831101)52:9<1551::aid-cncr2820520902>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Haugstvedt T. K., Viste A., Eide G. E., Söreide O. Norwegian multicentre study of survival and prognostic factors in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric carcinoma. The Norwegian Stomach Cancer Trial. Br J Surg. 1993 Apr;80(4):475–478. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ichikura T., Tomimatsu S., Okusa Y., Uefuji K., Tamakuma S. Comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage based on their location in patients with gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Oct;11(10):1894–1900. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.10.1894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LAUREN P. THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA. AN ATTEMPT AT A HISTO-CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64:31–49. doi: 10.1111/apm.1965.64.1.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Makino M., Moriwaki S., Yonekawa M., Oota M., Kimura O., Kaibara N. Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 1991 May;47(1):12–16. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930470104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Okusa T., Nakane Y., Boku T., Takada H., Yamamura M., Hioki K., Yamamoto M. Quantitative analysis of nodal involvement with respect to survival rate after curative gastrectomy for carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 Jun;170(6):488–494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rohde H., Gebbensleben B., Bauer P., Stützer H., Zieschang J. Has there been any improvement in the staging of gastric cancer? Findings from the German Gastric Cancer TNM Study Group. Cancer. 1989 Dec 15;64(12):2465–2481. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19891215)64:12<2465::aid-cncr2820641212>3.0.co;2-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shiu M. H., Perrotti M., Brennan M. F. Adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a multivariate analysis of clinical, pathologic and treatment factors. Hepatogastroenterology. 1989 Feb;36(1):7–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wu C. W., Hsieh M. C., Tsay S. H., Lui W. Y., P'eng F. K. Adenocarcinoma of midstomach. Clinical and pathoanatomic relation to lymph node metastases. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1994 Oct;19(3):259–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu C. W., Hsieh M. J., Lo S. S., Tsay S. H., Lui W. Y., P'eng F. K. Lymph node metastasis from carcinoma of the distal one-third of the stomach. Cancer. 1994 Apr 15;73(8):2059–2064. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940415)73:8<2059::aid-cncr2820730808>3.0.co;2-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES