Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1995 Jan;61(1):205–208. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.1.205-208.1995

Assessment of Salinity-Related Mortality of Freshwater Bacteria in the Saint Lawrence Estuary

J Painchaud, J Therriault, L Legendre
PMCID: PMC1388326  PMID: 16534903

Abstract

The growth response of freshwater bacteria from the St. Lawrence River, exposed to brackish waters (salinity of 0 to 20(permil)) from the upper estuary, was assessed by a methodology requiring the combined use of dilution cultures and diffusion chambers. The longitudinal distribution of bacterial abundance in waters within this salinity range was also examined. Growth of the freshwater bacteria was reduced by 15 and 50% after exposure to salinities of 10 and 20(permil), respectively. At lower salinities, no growth reduction was observed, and at a salinity of 2(permil), growth was even stimulated. Longitudinal distribution data showed that bacterial abundance also peaked at this salinity. In contrast with an earlier hypothesis, this study shows that the decline of bacterial abundance in the low-salinity waters of the estuary is not caused by salinity-related mortality of freshwater bacteria, because the mixing time between fresh and marine (>20(permil)) waters is relatively long (days). However, results suggest that mortality of freshwater bacteria can be an important process in estuaries with shorter mixing times (hours). The combined use of diffusion chambers and dilution cultures proved to be a valuable methodology for assessing growth (or mortality) of bacteria exposed to environmental gradients.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (172.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson I. C., Rhodes M. W., Kator H. I. Seasonal variation in survival of Escherichia coli exposed in situ in membrane diffusion chambers containing filtered and nonfiltered estuarine water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Jun;45(6):1877–1883. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.6.1877-1883.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ferguson R. L., Buckley E. N., Palumbo A. V. Response of marine bacterioplankton to differential filtration and confinement. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Jan;47(1):49–55. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.1.49-55.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hobbie J. E., Daley R. J., Jasper S. Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 May;33(5):1225–1228. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.5.1225-1228.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lessard E. J., Sieburth J. M. Survival of natural sewage populations of enteric bacteria in diffusion and batch chambers in the marine environment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Mar;45(3):950–959. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.3.950-959.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McFeters G. A., Stuart D. G. Survival of coliform bacteria in natural waters: field and laboratory studies with membrane-filter chambers. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Nov;24(5):805–811. doi: 10.1128/am.24.5.805-811.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rhodes M. W., Anderson I. C., Kator H. I. In situ development of sublethal stress in Escherichia coli: effects on enumeration. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Jun;45(6):1870–1876. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.6.1870-1876.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Vasconcelos G. J., Swartz R. G. Survival of bacteria in seawater using a diffusion chamber apparatus in situ. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Jun;31(6):913–920. doi: 10.1128/aem.31.6.913-920.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES