Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1995 Mar;61(3):1004–1012. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.3.1004-1012.1995

Effect of Two Plant Species, Flax (Linum usitatissinum L.) and Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), on the Diversity of Soilborne Populations of Fluorescent Pseudomonads

P Lemanceau, T Corberand, L Gardan, X Latour, G Laguerre, J Boeufgras, C Alabouvette
PMCID: PMC1388382  PMID: 16534950

Abstract

Suppression of soilborne disease by fluorescent pseudomonads may be inconsistent. Inefficient root colonization by the introduced bacteria is often responsible for this inconsistency. To better understand the bacterial traits involved in root colonization, the effect of two plant species, flax (Linum usitatissinum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), on the diversity of soilborne populations was assessed. Fluorescent pseudomonads were isolated from an uncultivated soil and from rhizosphere, rhizoplane, and root tissue of flax and tomato cultivated in the same soil. Species and biovars were identified by classical biochemical and physiological tests. The ability of bacterial isolates to assimilate 147 different organic compounds and to show three different enzyme activities was assessed to determine their intraspecific phenotypic diversity. Numerical analysis of these characteristics allowed the clustering of isolates showing a high level (87.8%) of similarity. On the whole, the populations isolated from soil were different from those isolated from plants with respect to their phenotypic characteristics. The difference in bacteria isolated from uncultivated soil and from root tissue of flax was particularly marked. The intensity of plant selection was more strongly expressed with flax than with tomato plants. The selection was, at least partly, plant specific. The use of 10 different substrates allowed us to discriminate between flax and tomato isolates. Pseudomonas fluorescens biovars II, III, and V and Pseudomonas putida biovar A and intermediate type were well distributed among the isolates from soil, rhizosphere, and rhizoplane. Most isolates from root tissue of flax and tomato belonged to P. putida bv. A and to P. fluorescens bv. II, respectively. Phenotypic characterization of bacterial isolates was well correlated with genotypic characterization based on repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR fingerprinting.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (345.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barrett E. L., Solanes R. E., Tang J. S., Palleroni N. J. Pseudomonas fluorescens biovar V: its resolution into distinct component groups and the relationship of these groups to other P. fluorescens biovars, to P. putida, and to psychrotrophic pseudomonads associated with food spoilage. J Gen Microbiol. 1986 Oct;132(10):2709–2721. doi: 10.1099/00221287-132-10-2709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Champion A. B., Barrett E. L., Palleroni N. J., Soderberg K. L., Kunisawa R., Contopoulou R., Wilson A. C., Doudoroff M. Evolution in Pseudomonas fluorescens. J Gen Microbiol. 1980 Oct;120(2):485–511. doi: 10.1099/00221287-120-2-485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Colbert S. F., Isakeit T., Ferri M., Weinhold A. R., Hendson M., Schroth M. N. Use of an Exotic Carbon Source To Selectively Increase Metabolic Activity and Growth of Pseudomonas putida in Soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Jul;59(7):2056–2063. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.7.2056-2063.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Descamps P., Véron M. Une méthode de choix des caractères d'identification basée sur le théorème de Bayes et la mesure de l'information. Ann Microbiol (Paris) 1981 Sep-Oct;132B(2):157–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KING E. O., WARD M. K., RANEY D. E. Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J Lab Clin Med. 1954 Aug;44(2):301–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kremer R. J., Begonia M. F., Stanley L., Lanham E. T. Characterization of rhizobacteria associated with weed seedlings. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Jun;56(6):1649–1655. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.6.1649-1655.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Laguerre G., Rigottier-Gois L., Lemanceau P. Fluorescent Pseudomonas species categorized by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/restriction fragment analysis of 16S rDNA. Mol Ecol. 1994 Oct;3(5):479–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1994.tb00126.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lelliott R. A., Billing E., Hayward A. C. A determinative scheme for the fluorescent plant pathogenic pseudomonads. J Appl Bacteriol. 1966 Dec;29(3):470–489. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1966.tb03499.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leung K., Strain S. R., de Bruijn F. J., Bottomley P. J. Genotypic and Phenotypic Comparisons of Chromosomal Types within an Indigenous Soil Population of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Feb;60(2):416–426. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.2.416-426.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mavingui P., Laguerre G., Berge O., Heulin T. Genetic and Phenotypic Diversity of Bacillus polymyxa in Soil and in the Wheat Rhizosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Jun;58(6):1894–1903. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.6.1894-1903.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Palleroni N. J., Ballard R. W., Ralston E., Doudoroff M. Deoxyribonucleic acid homologies among some Pseudomonas species. J Bacteriol. 1972 Apr;110(1):1–11. doi: 10.1128/jb.110.1.1-11.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rovira A. D. Interactions between plant roots and soil microorganisms. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1965;19:241–266. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.19.100165.001325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sands D. C., Rovira A. D. Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G, the dominant fluorescent pseudomonad in South Australian soils and wheat rhizospheres. J Appl Bacteriol. 1971 Mar;34(1):261–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1971.tb02285.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stanier R. Y., Palleroni N. J., Doudoroff M. The aerobic pseudomonads: a taxonomic study. J Gen Microbiol. 1966 May;43(2):159–271. doi: 10.1099/00221287-43-2-159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Versalovic J., Koeuth T., Lupski J. R. Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in eubacteria and application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Dec 25;19(24):6823–6831. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.24.6823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. de Bruijn F. J. Use of repetitive (repetitive extragenic palindromic and enterobacterial repetitive intergeneric consensus) sequences and the polymerase chain reaction to fingerprint the genomes of Rhizobium meliloti isolates and other soil bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Jul;58(7):2180–2187. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.7.2180-2187.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. van Peer Ron, Punte Helma L. M., de Weger Letty A., Schippers Bob. Characterization of Root Surface and Endorhizosphere Pseudomonads in Relation to Their Colonization of Roots. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Aug;56(8):2462–2470. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.8.2462-2470.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES