Abstract
The predation of a luminescence-marked strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens by the soil ciliate Colpoda steinii was studied in soil microcosms. Bacterial cells were introduced in either small (neck diameter, <6 (mu)m) or intermediate-sized (neck diameter, 6 to 30 (mu)m) pores in the soil by inoculation at appropriate matric potentials, and ciliates were introduced into large pores (neck diameter, 30 to 60 (mu)m). Viable cell concentrations of bacteria introduced into intermediate-sized pores decreased at a greater rate than those in small pores, with reductions in bacterial populations being accompanied by an increase in viable cell numbers of the ciliate. The data indicate that the location of bacteria in small pores provides significant protection from predation. In the absence of C. steinii, the level of metabolic activity of the bacterial population, measured by luminometry, decreased at a greater rate than cell number, and the level of luminescence cell(sup-1) consequently decreased. The decrease in levels of luminescence indicates a loss of activity due to starvation. During predation by C. steinii, the level of the activity of cells introduced into small pores fell in a similar manner. The level of cell activity was, however, significantly greater for cells introduced into intermediate-sized pores, despite their greater susceptibility to predation. The data suggest that increased activity arises from a release of nutrients by the predator and the greater accessibility of bacteria to nutrients in larger pores. Nutrient amendment of microcosms resulted in increases in bacterial populations to sustained, higher levels, while levels of luminescence increased transiently. The predation of cells introduced into intermediate-sized pores was greater, and there was also evidence that the level of activity of surviving bacteria was greater for bacteria in intermediate-sized but not small pores.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (276.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Alexander M. Why microbial predators and parasites do not eliminate their prey and hosts. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1981;35:113–133. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.35.100181.000553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clement B., Guguen-Guillouzo C., Campion J. P., Glaise D., Bourel M., Guillouzo A. Long-term co-cultures of adult human hepatocytes with rat liver epithelial cells: modulation of albumin secretion and accumulation of extracellular material. Hepatology. 1984 May-Jun;4(3):373–380. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840040305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Habte M., Alexander M. Further evidence for the regulation of bacterial populations in soil by protozoa. Arch Microbiol. 1977 Jun 20;113(3):181–183. doi: 10.1007/BF00492022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meikle A., Killham K., Prosser J. I., Glover L. A. Luminometric measurement of population activity of genetically modified Pseudomonas fluorescens in the soil. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992 Dec 1;78(2-3):217–220. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(92)90029-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]