Abstract
Fibrillar proteins form structural elements of cells and the extracellular matrix. Pathological lesions of fibrillar microanatomical structures, or secondary fibrillar changes in globular proteins are well known. A special group concerns histologically amorphous deposits, amyloid. The major characteristics of amyloid are: apple green birefringence after Congo red staining of histological sections, and non-branching 7–10 nm thick fibrils on electron microscopy revealing a high content of cross beta pleated sheets. About 25 different types of amyloid have been characterised. In animals, AA-amyloid is the most frequent type. Other types of amyloid in animals represent: AIAPP (in cats), AApoAI, AApoAII, localised AL-amyloid, amyloid in odontogenic or mammary tumors and amyloid in the brain. In old dogs Aβ and in sheep APrPsc-amyloid can be encountered. AA-amyloidosis is a systemic disorder with a precursor in blood, acute phase serum amyloid A (SAA). In chronic inflammatory processes AA-amyloid can be deposited. A rapid crystallization of SAA to amyloid fibrils on small beta-sheeted fragments, the ‘amyloid enhancing factor’ (AEF), is known and the AEF has been shown to penetrate the enteric barrier. Amyloid fibrils can aggregate from various precursor proteins in vitro in particular at acidic pH and when proteolytic fragments are formed. Molecular chaperones influence this process. Tissue data point to amyloid fibrillogenesis in lysosomes and near cell surfaces. A comparison can be made of the fibrillogenesis in prion diseases and in enhanced AA-amyloidosis. In the reactive form, acute phase SAA is the supply of the precursor protein, whereas in the prion diseases, cell membrane proteins form a structural source. Aβ-amyloid in brain tissue of aged dogs showing signs of dementia forms a canine counterpart of senile dementia of the Alzheimer type (ccSDAT) in man. Misfolded proteins remain potential food hazards. Developments concerning prevention of amyloidogenesis and therapy of amyloid deposits are shortly commented.
Keywords: Extracellular fibrils, Amyloid, Amyloid enhancing factor, Prion, PrP, Spongiform encephalopathy, Alzheimer’s disease
INTRODUCTION
Proteins are found in each cell and tissue and there is close connection between pathological lesions and changes in proteins. Several structural fibrillar proteins are found within the cells and the extracellular compartment. Pathological lesions of fibrillar microanatomical structures may be accompanied by fibrillar changes. As pathology starts in the necropsy room and ends as science, some examples of lesions observed in morbid anatomy, histopathology, immune histochemistry, ultrastructural pathology, X ray diffraction (XR), infra red spectroscopy (IR) or circular dichroism (CD), will be mentioned.
After presentation of examples of fibrillar proteins in animal pathology, the major part of this paper will be directed to a special group of pathological fibrillar proteins: amyloid.
EXAMPLES OF FIBRILLAR PROTEINS IN ANIMAL PATHOLOGY
Coagulation disorders such as thrombotic lesions, degenerative tissue changes and collagen changes such as scarring, are common findings. Most general pathology books have good chapters on these subjects. Human hematology textbooks outline coagulation and coagulation disorders resulting in fibrin formation.
Cellular fibrillar proteins are well known in histopathology. Many researches have been conducted on the role of cytoskeletal elements: microfilaments, microtubules and the intermediate sized filaments especially important for tumour diagnostics and in daily abattoir pathology (the prostate gland metaplastic epithelium’s cytokeratine development is used to monitor treatment with anabolic steroids). In the human brain neurofibrillary tangles form a common lesion associated with disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease. Whereas not frequently reported, these tangles sparsely occur in old dogs (Papaioannou et al., 2001). Cases of muscular dystrophy, as studied in dogs or in MRY-breed cattle, showed myofibrillary degeneration with central core pathology (Goedegebuure et al., 1983; Goedegebuure, 1987). In cases of dermatosparaxis, the extracellular collagen fibrils are targets of morphological studies in many laboratories. Routine electron microscopy is often disappointing, while irregularity in thickness and contour of the fibrils (Brown et al., 1993) as well as fibril twisting (Minor, 1980) are frequently encountered features instead of the characteristic hieroglyphic pattern shown in some textbooks (Jones et al., 1997) and papers (Abramo et al., 1999).
Joints with cartilage degeneration may show fibrillation as indication of proteoglycan loss. The extracellular matrix proteoglycans can be visualized by electron microscopy after cuprolinic blue staining (Niewold et al., 1991). Electron microscopy has been used for ultrastructural quality assessment of human cardiovalvular homografts (Goffin et al., 1997). Explants of human valves obtained at autopsy years after transplantation from persons who had been living with a well-functioning heart, are known to show loss of cellularity (Goffin et al., 1990; Koolbergen et al., 1998). In an EC-BIOMED-2 project on the subject of viable cells in the transplants, sheep experiments were performed. Fresh ovine aortic valve homografts, frozen valves and peracetic acid-killed leaflets were implanted in the thoracic aorta of recipient sheep. Six months after implantation, the animals were euthanasied and the valves studied for several variables in different European laboratories. In all the cases, the connective tissue was found to be of more or less medium-fair quality with fair content of proteoglycans, but the original fibroblasts appeared to have been lost (Aidulis et al., 2002; Farrington et al., 2002; Neves et al., 2002). At the graft surface, however, several cell layers had developed. Analysis of similarity between graft and recipient by three DNA microsatellites revealed differences in pattern only in two cases of the peracetic acid-treated group. This indicated donor DNA remained in a graft without histologically visible nuclei after a six months implantation period (Neves et al., 2002).
Another example of pathology of fibrillar proteins was in leather with speckles. From frozen skins we processed halves to leather, while the other halves were studied by histopathology. This revealed blood-sucking lice at areas corresponding with the speckles in the leather.
In amorphous deposits, moreover, fibrillar proteins may occur. A major group of electron microscopically fibrillar proteins is found in histopathologically amorphous extracellular deposits, amyloid.
AMYLOID AND VIRCHOW
After Virchow (1854) coined the name, amyloid, for the pathological extracellular material he found during histopathological examination of human patients, one-hundred-fifty years later we still call it amyloid. He used the word, amyloid, because of iodine staining similarities with extracellular plant material as wood and starch. In 1859 already, Friedreich and Kekulé (1859) described the protein nature of amyloid. Chemical investigations in the second half of the twentieth century revealed a role for glycosaminoglycans and heparan sulphate- (Snow et al., 1987; 1995) and/or chondroitin sulphate-containing proteoglycans in amyloid (Niewold et al., 1991; Magnus, 1991).
A burst in amyloid research developed after the electron-microscopical discovery of amyloid fibrils in 1958 by Cohen (Cohen et al., 1958; Cohen and Calkins, 1959) and subsequent description by others (Spiro, 1959). It offered new possibilities for isolation (Pras et al., 1968), peptide separation and analysis of a large series of different chemical amyloid types corresponding to the known variations in clinicopathological patterns, and offered a rational base for nomenclature (WHO-IUIS, 1993; INC, 1998a; 1998b): the first letter, A, for amyloid and one or more others for the chemical type. The first amyloid type characterised was amyloid protein of a group A: AA. The second A of AA stands for the protein-A, with the A simply representing the first letter of the alphabet (Benditt and Eriksen, 1971). AA is derived from the acute phase reactant, serum amyloid A (SAA) which is an apolipoprotein of high-density lipoproteins (HDL), classes 2 and 3 (INC, 1998b; Benditt et al., 1979; 1982). It is formed mainly by the liver upon stimulation by pro-inflammatory cytokines (Gruys et al., 1994), in particular interleukin-6 (Mihara et al., 2004). A second type originally designated group B (Benditt and Eriksen, 1971), soon was called AL, with the L representing light chain because this type appeared to be derived from monoclonal immunoglobulin light chain proteins. At present more than twenty-five types have been characterized, one of which is an isolate of mammary corpora amylacea in bovine milk (Niewold et al., 1999a). Alpha-S2-casein peptide was extracted and the amyloid was designated Aα-S2C (Niewold et al., 1999a). Recent studies in our laboratory on guanidium chloride-dissolved, water extracted, amyloid fibrils isolated from tissue-derived bovine corpora, on Western blotting revealed a single cross-reacting band corresponding to mammary serum amyloid-A3 (mSAA3) (McDonald et al., 2001).
AMYLOID CHARACTERISTICS
Notwithstanding the different chemical types, the insoluble amyloid fibrils were found to share a characteristic ultrastructural morphology of stiff, non-branching, about 7.5–10 nm thick fibrils of undetermined length (Cohen, 1966) with a hydrophobic core (Li et al., 1999; Inouye et al., 2000). High magnification electron microscopy of the fibrils revealed a superficial twist and two protofibrils (Cohen, 1966). On subsequent X-ray diffraction studies (Eanes and Glenner, 1968) and infrared spectroscopy Glenner et al.(1974) described patterns which accord with a high content of antiparallel cross beta pleated sheets as secondary molecular structure for the amyloid types studied (AA and AL). This also clearly has been shown in domestic animal material (Van Andel et al., 1986; 1988b). The cross beta pleated sheet became a widely adopted concept, whereas other possibilities such as beta turns and beta helixes to explain the laboratory results, remain (Lazo and Downing, 1998). Glenner (1980) proposed the term beta-fibrillosis to describe the amyloid diseases, but this became never widely accepted. After studying amyloid in central organs, Glenner started with brain amyloids and found the same characteristics in fibrils derived from human Alzheimer plaques (Glenner and Wong, 1984) and in fibrillar material obtained from brains of hamsters with experimental scrapie (Prusiner et al., 1983).
On histology, the amyloid deposits showed uniform tinctorial characteristics of which apple green birefringence after staining with Congo red was most specific (Glenner, 1981), and its orange coloured fluorescence is most sensitive (Linke, 2000). Several pathologists tried to classify the different amyloid deposits found. Romhanyi (1971; 1972) succeeded in finding a method to distinguish between major groups by pretreating the sections before Congo red staining. Later on, others used potassium permanganate method (Wright et al., 1977) to distinguish AA from non-AA. At present, in most laboratories, polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies are used for immunohistochemistry which can be applied on paraffin sections (Van de Kaa et al., 1986) and plastic embedded thin sections for electron microscopy (Niewold et al., 1991; Linke et al., 1983; Peperkamp et al., 1997).
The most frequently encountered amyloid type in veterinary medicine is AA-amyloid. The characteristic deposition pattern in most species is in the central organs such as spleen, liver, enteric mucosa and arterial walls. In Gallinae (Landman and Gruys, 1998) it may also be deposited in the joints.
In Felidae, pancreatic insular amyloid (AIAPP) is rather common (Ma et al., 1998). Other types of amyloid less frequently encountered in animal species, are AapoAI (Roertgen et al., 1995) or AApoAII (Gruys et al., 1996), localised AL amyloid (Van Andel et al., 1988a; Ramos-Vara et al., 1998; Platz et al., 1997), amyloid in odontogenic tumours (Gardner et al., 1994; Breuer et al., 1994) or mammary tumours (Taniyama et al., 2000) and amyloid in brain tissues: Aβ in old dogs and AprPsc in sheep with scrapie (Van Keulen et al., 1995) (>50% in a small series of Dutch cases (Gruys, 1988).
FIBRILLOGENESIS AND THE AMYLOID ENHANCING FACTOR (AEF)
The pathogenesis and formation of amyloid represent an intriguing enigma. Whereas for the characterised types their precursors are known, it is unclear exactly how the transition of alpha helixes and random coils into the beta-pleated sheets occurs. The precursors of some human hereditary forms of amyloidosis represent amyloidogenic mutants, whereas other precursors are totally normal proteins. Numerous experimental investigations have been published regarding different types of amyloid. The first studies (with immunoglobulin light chain proteins and insulin) were under lysosomal pH and proteolytic conditions. Parallel-aligned intralysosomal amyloid, however, also developed in rats after phagocytosis of injected bovine fibril suspensions (Gruys and Castaño, 1977).
Later on, amyloid precursor protein crystallisation upon a beta-sheeted nucleus was described (Kisilevsky et al., 1995). The transformation, however, needed a lag time. Working with SAA- or AA-rich solutions, freezing and thawing (own observation) and acidic pH (Kluve-Beckerman et al., 1999) were found to trigger fibrillogenesis. Some papers (Seelig et al., 1995; Wimley et al., 1998; Van Nostrand et al., 1998) reported studies of the transition processes of precursors to amyloid fibrils using physical techniques such as circular dichroism and nuclear magnetic resonance (Guijarro et al., 1998). From these papers it appears that physicochemical growth of amyloid fibrils by changing the original molecular structure to beta turns, cross beta sheets or beta helixes is a rather simple process. It is mediated by degraded fragments, or by prefibrillar protein species where by molecular chaperones largely may influence the crystallisation process (Dobson, 2004). Amyloidogenic sequence stretches in proteins have been recognised which were validated experimentally (Lopez de la Paz and Serrano, 2004). Short specific amino acid stretches appeared to enhance the amyloidogenesis (Ventura et al., 2004) and self replicating beta stranded peptides forming amyloid-like fibrils, have been mentioned (Takahashi and Mihara, 2004). In solutions from different amyloid precursors including SAA, transthyretin, Aβ precursor protein and PrPc, beta pleated fibrils can be formed in particular at lysosomal pH or even high pressure (Torrent et al., 2004). Various cofactors such serum amyloid P-component, proteoglycans, apolipoprotein E-4 and calcium ions, are known from animal experiments and in vitro studies (MacRaild et al., 2004). Also intracellularly several molecular chaperone pathways are known preventing misfolding (Carver et al., 2003; Barral et al., 2004).
In animal studies, however, the deposition of amyloid appeared to be not in any case as predicted. Reaggregation studies of bovine AA-amyloid fibrillar proteins that were separated by gel filtration in guanidium chloride, revealed that, except for the AA protein, material of larger molecular weight was necessary to reobtain congophilic fibrils (Van Andel et al., 1986; Hol et al., 1983).
In experimental rodents (mouse and hamster) the acute phase SAA was found to be of major importance (Hol et al., 1985) and should be kept elevated in concentration by long lasting a reactive stimulus (e.g. by repeated injections of casein, LPS, or silver nitrate) and should represent an amyloidogenic isotype. Amyloid resistant mouse strains were found to have a non-amyloidogenic acute phase SAA (Gonnerman et al., 1995; Liang et al., 1998). Rats were shown not to form acute phase SAA and AA-amyloid at all (Ren et al., 1999; Yu et al., 2000).
When induced in the appropriate mice or hamsters, the AA-amyloid was deposited after a lag period which could dramatically become reduced with a single injection of an extract of amyloid-containing tissue, preamyloid tissue or even normal tissue, called amyloid enhancing factor (AEF). This factor was not serine-protease-sensitive and a similar enhancement was obtained after injection of rhTNF-α or poly-I:C (Niewold, 1990), and molecules with preformed beta structure, such as silk (Kisilevsky et al., 1999). Acceleration of ATTR amyloidosis with preformed fibrils, however, not developed in mice transgenic for wild-type human transthyretin (Tagoe et al., 2004), whereas injection of apolipoprotein A-II fibrils in young senescence-accelerated mice enhanced AApoAII amyloidosis (Higuchi et al., 1998; Xing et al., 2001).
The AEF was found to represent a low molecular weight glycoprotein which, when isolated from hamster amyloid fibrils (FAEF), contained Congo red-negative beta pleated sheet nuclei (Niewold et al., 1987). Murine glycerol-extracted AEF appeared to contain most prominently C-terminally degraded SAA fragments (Magy et al., 2003).
The AEF in murine studies had been found to pass the digestive tract barrier (Elliott-Bryant and Cathcart, 1998; Lundmark et al., 2002) as did AApoAII in senescence accelerated mice (Xing et al., 2001). AEF did not cross the placental barrier in the mouse (Shtrasburg et al., 1999).
It is noteworthy that AEF might be necessary for the AA-amyloidogenesis from SAA. Presumably AEF represents a nidus for the crystallisation of the amyloidogenic acute phase SAA and cytokines with a beta sandwich might be involved in the process of formation of the first nidus (Gruys and Snel, 1994). Further on, misfolded SAA-fragments might accelerate the fibrillogenesis. Cathepsin (Cat) B from murine macrophages was found to form amyloidogenic SAA derivatives, whereas Cat D did the opposite (Phipps-Yonas et al., 2004). Murine macrophages formed amyloid easily from recombinant SAA when AEF was present (Kluve-Beckerman et al., 1999). Best results were obtained after addition of the proteolysis-inhibitor, pepstatin, and AEF (Kluve-Beckerman et al., 1999). On cultures of fibroblasts the AEF adhered to the cells and functioned as crystallisation nidus or sink for the recombinant SAA protein (Magy et al., 2003).
During electron microscopy of the first deposited amyloid fibrils in the FAEF hamster model, Niewold (Niewold, 1990) discovered ultrastructural changes which accorded with accumulation of SAA antigen at the outer cell membrane and intramembranous AA-fibrillogenesis. Some papers on other types of amyloid mention the cell membrane as template for beta pleated fibrillogenesis (Seelig et al., 1995; Wimley et al., 1998; Van Nostrand et al., 1998) resulting in membrane perturbation and development of cell pathology (Muller et al., 1995; Janson et al., 1999). Gruys et al.(1979), and Niewold (1990) showed vesicular membrane remnants to accompany freshly deposited amyloid fibrils. Intramembranous fibril formation by rearrangement to linearly aligned hydrophobic protein moieties might result in stiff fibrillar areas explaining membrane rupture with amyloid extrusion from the cell surface and vesicles between the amyloid fibrils (Gruys and Snel, 1994).
The above mentioned membrane findings favour the possibility of amyloid formation as a disorder of cell membranes, making it even more delicate when the precursor protein itself is a normal component of that cellular compartment such as Aβ precursor protein and the cellular PrP.
PRIONS, THE BSE CRISIS
Different from other medical people working on transmissible encephalopathies, Stanley Prusiner chose scrapie in experimental hamsters as subject of his research and conducted chemical investigations on extraction of the agent (Prusiner, 1982), which he found to represent a small peptide, without nucleic acids, which easily formed rods. He coined the name prion for the agent and PrP for the peptide. With the help of Glenner he proved they had amyloid characteristics (Prusiner et al., 1983). He showed the agent replicated itself by changing the conformation of the cellular PrP to that of PrPsc, from alpha helix to beta pleated sheets. In the animal experiment it was a process with a long incubation period. Prusiner found the agent in brain and spleen tissue (Prusiner, 1982). Ehlers and Diringer (1984) showed rapid early replication what could be prevented by dextran sulphate-500, a macrophage-inhibitor. Later studies (Brown et al., 1999) showed that follicular dendritic cells carry cellular PrP and possibly represent the primary area of concentration increase of the prion. The infectious prion protein that is known to cross the enteric barrier after oral exposure, can be considered to use a toxic mechanism for its replication: changing the molecular folding of its sister molecules in cell membranes carrying these molecules, to beta pleated sheets resulting in more prions.
Prusiner’s findings and hypotheses were rapidly adopted in all countries were scrapie was endemic. Discussions on viroids and virinos (Kimberlin, 1982) remained (Schreuder, 1998) and even bacterial agents were proposed (Bastian et al., 1981; Wisniewski et al., 1996) until the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) crisis emerged and transgenic mouse experiments proved the agent replication concept (Scott et al., 1999). Last critics started to vanish after human patients and cats developed a new variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob’s disease (nvCJD) and feline spongiform encephalopathy (FSE) respectively, both caused by the BSE agent (Pearson et al., 1992; Almond and Pattison, 1997; Hill et al., 1997; Bruce et al., 1997).
The BSE epidemic is considered to have originated from a changed rendering process and the feeding of meat and bone meal to ruminants (Wilesmith et al., 1988; 1991). Debate is still ongoing regarding the sheep- or cattle-origin of the prion before it underwent concentration increase by the rendering-feed cycle.
As such, an alimentary infection route functioning as a nidus for its own increase, may be compared with the role of AEF in reactive amyloidosis. That latter factor can pass the gut barrier, but needs a separate supply of amyloidogenic acute phase SAA, whereas the PrPsc finds its substrate in the cell membranes of the lymphoid and nervous systems.
SPECIES AND BREED SUSCEPTIBILITY
Amino acid transpositions in the human PrP protein make subjects prone to spontaneous CJD, with the genetic make up of a single gene explaining their susceptibility (Collins et al., 2000). It was also shown that differences in prion susceptibility between breeds of sheep (Belt et al., 1995; Hunter et al., 1997) or mouse (Bruce et al., 1991) depend on their PrP genes. Parry already in 1983 described scrapie in sheep flocks as a genetic disorder (Parry, 1983).
Species barriers were shown to be associated with genetic susceptibility, the amino acid sequence of the middle third (Priola, 1999) of the PrP and, in particular, with glycosylation differences of the prion (Collinge et al., 1996; Collinge, 1999). Experiments with transgenic mice resulted in the final proof (Telling, 2000).
Differences in susceptibility to reactive amyloidosis as found in human families (Livneh et al., 1997; Tekin et al., 2000), Abyssinian and Siamese cats (Van der Linde-Sipman et al., 1997; Niewold et al., 1999b), and brown layer poultry (Landman, 1998) might have a more complex pathogenical explanation. Not only are genes necessary for amyloidogenic SAAs, but also cytokine release/inflammation enhancing genes may be involved; as has been shown in human families with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) (Livneh et al., 1997; Tekin et al., 2000).
After Enterococcus faecalis injection to induce amyloid arthropathy, brown chickens which were shown to have similar predicted SAA as their less amyloid-susceptible white counterparts (Ovelgönne et al., 1999), revealed more polymorphonuclear leukocytes and a weaker CD8+ lymphocyte response than white layers (Zekarias et al., 2000). This epiphenomenon fits with old results in murine experimental amyloidosis concerning T-cell suppression. In the chickens, the occurrence of a genetic difference in T-helper reactivity (Th1/Th2-balance) has finally been proposed as important pathogenic factor in their infection-related amyloid-susceptibility/resistance.
CANINE COUNTERPART OF SENILE DEMENTIA OF THE ALZHEIMER TYPE (ccSDAT)
In brain tissue of aged dogs, Alzheimer-like pathology has been encountered with lipofuscin being present in neurons and macrophages, Aβ-precursor protein in neurons, Aβ-positive plaques, 4-hydroxynonenal in neurons and macrophages, and limited intraneuronal accumulation of tau and advanced glycation end products increasing with longevity (Gruys, 1995; Papaioannou et al., 2001; Rofina et al., 2001a; 2003). A limited number of Gallyas’ silver stain positive tangles has been encountered (Papaioannou et al., 2001). Reaction of microglia cells and accumulation of macrophages in relationship to the plaques were not obvious. However, a close spatial relationship of the plaques with small blood vessels was observed (Rofina et al., 2003). After perfusing the brain arteries with barium sulphate, a decreased filling was found associated with longevity (Rofina et al., 2001b). Behaviour scores of aged dogs revealed a group of demented animals. In brain tissue sections and extracts of brain samples of those demented dogs, significantly more lipofuscin-like pigments and carbonyls were measured than in not-demented counterparts, whereas α-tocopherol was decreased (Skoumalova et al., 2003). Ongoing correlation studies for pathological and behavioral changes in our laboratory so far, reveal amyloid, oxidative damage product accumulation and cortical atrophy to represent significant markers for dementia. These results favor oxidative tissue damage and nutritional antioxidative components to be of major pathogenical, preventive and therapeutical significance in canine senile dementia of the Alzheimer type.
COMMENTS
From the discussed pathological fibrillar proteins it is clear that the misfolding of the amyloid precursors at present remains the most intriguing problem. Various clinical amyloid deposition-associated disorders (amyloidoses) are known and much is still undiscovered. Preventive and therapeutic interventions may regard stabilisation of precursor proteins, molecules that prevent fibrillogenesis, beta breaker peptides, small carbohydrates interfering with amyloid fibrils and amyloid specific antibodies (Buxbaum, 2004; De Lorenzi et al., 2004; Gandy et al., 2004; Heppner et al., 2004; Hurshman et al., 2004; Miller et al., 2004; Kisilevsky et al., 2004; Permanne et al., 2002; Rijkers et al., 2002).
The possible implications of the protein folding disorders in food-associated hazards must not to be ignored. With several small outbreaks of BSE in different parts of the world outside Europe, it remains a problem to be solved. In the meantime, tissues with any other type of amyloid should be carefully discarded because of its possible AEF activity and transenteral AA-amyloid accelerating effects (Elliott-Bryant and Cathcart, 1998; Lundmark et al., 2002). Cooking may not destroy all beta sheets in AA-amyloid as can be concluded from pressure and heating studies (Dubois et al., 1999).
With increasing age, the pathogenical factors related to brain decay and loss of cognitive capabilities are of major concern. The canine kept as pet dog may be regarded as model for SDAT, which disease together with cancer and cardiovascular lesions represent the major culprits associated with hospital costs and finally death.
Acknowledgments
The author is indebted to all past and present collaborators in the amyloid/acute phase protein project. Dr. M.J.M. Toussaint kindly commented on the manuscript.
Footnotes
Paper presented at the 27th Seminar on Recent Advances in Animal Health and Production, 22 March 2004, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
References
- 1.Abramo F, Colombo S, Di LC, Mortellaro CM. A case of cutaneous asthenia in a kitten. Europ J Vet Pathol. 1999;5:111–113. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aidulis D, Pegg DE, Hunt CJ, Goffin YA, Vanderkelen A, van Hoeck B, Santiago T, Ramos T, Gruys E, Voorhout W. Processing of ovine cardiac valve allografts: 1. Effects of preservation method and mechanical properties. Cell Tis Bank. 2002;3:79–89. doi: 10.1023/A:1022873513040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Almond F, Pattison J. Human BSE. Nature. 1997;389:437–438. doi: 10.1038/38876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Barral JM, Broadley SA, Schaffar G, Hartl FU. Roles of molecular chaperones in protein misfolding diseases. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2004;15:17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2003.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bastian FO, Hart MN, Cancilla PA. Additional evidence of spiroplasma in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Lancet. 1981;8221:660. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)91571-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Belt PBG, Muileman IH, Schreuder BEC, Bos-de Ruijter J, Gielkens ALJ, Smits M. Identification of five allelic variants of the sheep PrP gene and their association with natural scrapie. J Gen Virol. 1995;76:509–517. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-76-3-509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Benditt EP, Eriksen N. Chemical classes of amyloid substance. Am J Pathol. 1971;65:231–252. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Benditt EP, Eriksen N, Hanson RH. Amyloid protein SAA is an apooprotein of mouse plasma high density lipoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979;76:4092–4096. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.8.4092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Benditt EP, Hoffman JS, Eriksen N, Parmelee DC, Walsh KA. SAA, an apoprotein of HDL: its tructure and function. Ann New York Acad Sci. 1982;389:183–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1982.tb22136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Breuer W, Geisel O, Linke RP, Hermanns W. Light microscopic, ultrastructural, and inmmunohisto- chemical examinations of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumors (CEOT) in a dog and a cat. Vet Pathol. 1994;31:415–420. doi: 10.1177/030098589403100402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brown PJ, Young RD, Cripps PJ. Abnormalities of collagen fibrils in a rabbit with a connective-tissue defect similar to Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Res Vet Sci. 1993;55:346–350. doi: 10.1016/0034-5288(93)90105-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brown KL, Stewart K, Ritchie DL, Mabbott NA, Williams A, Fraser H, Morrison WI, Bruce ME. Scrapie replication in lymphoid tissues depends on prion protein-expressing follicular dendritic cells. Nat Med. 1999;5:1308–1312. doi: 10.1038/15264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bruce ME, McConnell I, Fraser H, Dickinson AG. The disease characteristics of different strains of scrapie in Sinc congenic mouse lines: implications for the nature of the agent and host control of pathogenesis. J Gen Virol. 1991;72:595–603. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-72-3-595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bruce ME, Will RG, Ironside JW, McConnell I, Drummond D, Suttie A, McCardie L, Chree A, Hope J, Birkett C, et al. Transmissions tp mice indicate that ‘new variant’ CJD is caused by the BSE agent. Nature. 1997;389:498–501. doi: 10.1038/39057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Buxbaum JN. The systemic amyloidoses. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2004;16:67–75. doi: 10.1097/00002281-200401000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Carver JA, Rekas A, Thorn DC, Wilson MR. Smalle heat-shock proteins and clusterin: intra- and extracellualr molecular chaperones with a common mechenism of action and function? IUBMB Life. 2003;55:661–668. doi: 10.1080/15216540310001640498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cohen AS. Preliminary chemical analysis of partially purified amyloid fibrils. Lab Invest. 1966;15:66–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cohen AS, Calkins E. Electron microscopic observations on a fibrous component in amyloid of diverse origins. Nature. 1959;183:1202–1203. doi: 10.1038/1831202a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cohen AS, Weiss L, Calkins E. A study of the fine structure of the spleen in experimental amyloidosis of the rabbit. Clin Res. 1958;6:237. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Collinge J. Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Lancet. 1999;354:317–322. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05128-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Collinge J, Sidle KC, Meads J, Ironside J, Hill AF. Molecular analysis of prion strain variation and the aetiology of ‘new variant’ CJD. Nature. 1996;383:685–690. doi: 10.1038/383685a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Collins S, Boyd A, Fletcher A, Byron K, Harper C, McLean CA, Masters CL. Novel prion protein gene mutation in an octogenarian with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Arch Neurol. 2000;57:1058–1063. doi: 10.1001/archneur.57.7.1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.De Lorenzi E, Giorgetti S, Grossi S, Merlini G, Caccialanza G, Bellotti V. Pharmaceutical strategies against amyloidosis: old and new drugs in targeting a “protein misfolding disease”. Curr Med Chem. 2004;11:1065–1084. doi: 10.2174/0929867043455549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dobson CM. Principles of protein folding, misfolding and aggregation. Sem Cell Dev Biol. 2004;15:3–16. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2003.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dubois J, Ismail AA, Chan SL, AliKhan Z. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic investigation of temperature- and pressure-induced diaggregation of amyloid A. Scan J Immunol. 1999;49:376–380. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.1999.00508.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Eanes ED, Glenner GG. X-ray diffraction studies of amyloid filaments. J Histochem Cytochem. 1968;16:673–677. doi: 10.1177/16.11.673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ehlers B, Diringer H. Dextran sulphate 500 delays and prevents mouse scrapie by impairment of agent replication in spleen. J Gen Virol. 1984;65:1325–1330. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-65-8-1325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Elliott-Bryant R, Cathcart ES. Amyloid enhancing factor and dietary transmission in accelerated amyloid A amyloidosis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1998;88:65–69. doi: 10.1006/clin.1998.4555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Farrington M, Wreghitt T, Matthews I, Scarr D, Sutehall G, Hunt CJ, Santiago T, Gruys E, Voorhout W, Ramos T, et al. Processing of cardiac valve allografts: 2. Effects of antimicrobial treatment on sterility, structure and mechanical properties. Cell Tiss Bank. 2002;3:91–103. doi: 10.1023/A:1022815013948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Friedreich N, Kekulé A. Zur Amyloidfrage. Virchows Arch Path Anat Klin Med. 1859;16:50–65. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gandy S, DeMattos RB, Lemere CA, Heppner FL, Leverone J, Aguzzi A, Ershler WB, Dai J, Fraser P, Hyslop PS, et al. Alzheimer A beta vaccination of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2004;18:44–46. doi: 10.1097/00002093-200401000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gardner DG, Dubielzig RR, McGee EV. The so-called calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumour in dogs and cats (amyloid-producing odontogenic tumour) J Comp Pathol. 1994;111:221–230. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9975(05)80001-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Glenner GG. Amyloid deposits and amyloidosis: the beta-fibrilloses (two parts) New Engl J Med. 1980;302:1283–1292. 1333–1343. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198006053022305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Glenner GG. The bases of the staining of amyloid fibers: their physicochemical nature and the mechanism of their dye-substrate interaction. Prog Histochem Cytochem. 1981;13:1–37. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6336(81)80003-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Glenner GG, Wong CW. Alzheimer’s disease: initial report of the purification and characterization of a novel cerebrovascular amyloid protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984;16:885–890. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(84)80190-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Glenner GG, Eanes ED, Bladen HA, Linke RP, Termine JD. β-Pleated sheet fibrils. A comparison of native amyloid with synthetic protein fibrils. J Histochem Cytochem. 1974;22:1141–1158. doi: 10.1177/22.12.1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Goedegebuure SA. Spontaneous primary myopathies in domestic animals: a review. Vet Quart. 1987;9:155–157. doi: 10.1080/01652176.1987.9694092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Goedegebuure SA, Hartman W, Hoebe HP. Dystrophy of the diaphragmatic muscles in adult Meuse-Rhine-Yssel cattle: electromyographical and histological findings. Vet Pathol. 1983;20:32–48. doi: 10.1177/030098588302000104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Goffin YA, Black MM, Lawford PV. The stability and performance of bioprosthetic heart valves. Curr Perspect Implant Dev. 1990;2:65–120. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Goffin YAH, de Henriques GR, Szombathelyi T, Toussaint MJM, Gruys E. Morphologic study of homograft valves before and after cryopreservation and after short-term implantation in patients. Cardiovasc Pathol. 1997;6:35–42. doi: 10.1016/S1054-8807(96)00072-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gonnerman WA, Elliott-Bryant R, Carreras I, Sipe JD, Cathcart ES. Linkage of protection against amyloid fibril formation in the mouse to a single, autosomal dominant gene. J Exp Med. 1995;181:2249–2252. doi: 10.1084/jem.181.6.2249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gruys E. Pathologische anatomie van nutszoogdieren. Deel X. Pathologie van het schaap en de geit, vervolg. Dier-en-Arts. 1988;3:92–100. (in Dutch) [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gruys E. First workshop and clinic on neuropathology in geriatric dogs and cats. Wiesbaden, Germany May 4-5, 1995. Amyloid Int J Exp Clin Invest. 1995;2:280–283. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gruys E, Castaño M. Parallel intraylysosomal amyloid fibrils, a possible result of phagocytosis. Vet Pathol. 1977;14:407–419. doi: 10.1177/030098587701400413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gruys E, Snel FWJJ. Animal models for reactive amyloidosis. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1994;8:599–611. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3579(05)80117-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gruys E, Timmermans HJ, van Ederen AM. Deposition of amyloid in the liver of hamsters: an enzyme-histochemical and electron-microscopical study. Lab Anim. 1979;13:1–9. doi: 10.1258/002367779781071230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gruys E, Obwolo MJ, Toussaint MJM. Diagnostic significance of the major acute phase proteins in veterinary clinical chemistry: a review. Vet Bull. 1994;64:1009–1018. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gruys E, Tooten PCJ, Kuijpers MHM. Lung, ileum and heart are predilection sites for AApoAII amyloid deposition in CD-1 Swiss mice used for toxicity studies, pulmonary amyloid indicates AApoAII. Lab Anim. 1996;30:28–34. doi: 10.1258/002367796780745018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Guijarro JI, Sunde M, Jones JA, Campbell ID, Dobson CM. Amyloid fibril formation by an SH3 domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:4224–4228. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Heppner FL, Gandy S, McLaurin J. Current concepts and future prospects for Alzheimer disease vaccines. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2004;18:38–43. doi: 10.1097/00002093-200401000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Higuchi K, Kogishi K, Wang J, Chen X, Chiba T, Matsushita T, Hoshii Y, Kawano H, Ishihara T, Yokota T, et al. Fibrillization in mouse senile amyloidosis is fibril conformation dependent. Lab Invest. 1998;78:1535–1542. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hill AF, Desbruslais M, Joiner S, Sidle KCL, Gowland I, Collinge J, Doey LJ, Lanton P. The same prion strain causes vCJD and BSE. Nature. 1997;389:448–450. doi: 10.1038/38925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hol PR, van Beuningen-Jansen EW, Gruys E. Reaggregation of Bovine Amyloid Protein AA. In: Tribe CR, Bacon PA, editors. Amyloidosis EARS. Bristol: Wright & Sons; 1983. pp. 158–163. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hol PR, van Ederen AM, Snel FWJJ, Langeveld JPM, Veerkamp JH, Gruys E. Activities of lysosomal enzymes and levels of serum amyloid A (SAA) in blood plasma of hamsters during casein induction of AA-amyloidosis. Br J Exp Pathol. 1985;66:279–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hunter N, Goldmann W, Foster JD, Cairns D, Smith G. Natural scrapie and PrP genotype: case-control studies in British sheep. Vet Rec. 1997;141:137–140. doi: 10.1136/vr.141.6.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hurshman AR, White JT, Powers ET, Kellt JW. Transthyretin aggregation under partially denaturing conditions is a downhill polymerization. Biochemistry. 2004;43:7365–7381. doi: 10.1021/bi049621l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Inouye H, Bond J, Baldwin MA, Ball HL, Prusiner SB, Kirschner DA. Structural changes in a hydrophobic domain of the prion protein induced by hydration and by Ala > Val and Pro > Leu substitutions. J Mol Biol. 2000;300:1283–1296. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.INC (International Nomenclature Committee) Part 1. Nomenclature of amyloid fibril proteins. Amyloid Int J Exp Clin Invest. 1998;6:63–66. doi: 10.3109/13506129908993290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.INC (International Nomenclature Committee) Part 2. Revised nomenclature for serum amyloid A (SAA) Amyloid Int J Exp Clin Invest. 1998;6:67–70. doi: 10.3109/13506129908993291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Janson J, Ashley RH, Harrison D, McIntyre S, Butler PC. The mechanism of islet amyloid polypeptide toxicity is membrane disruption by intermediate-sized toxic amyloid particles. Diabetes. 1999;48:491–498. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.48.3.491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Jones TC, Hunt RD, King NW. Veterinary Pathology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1997. p. 850. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kimberlin RH. Scapie agent: prions or virinos? Nature. 1982;297:107–108. doi: 10.1038/297107a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kisilevsky R, Gruys E, Shirahama T. Does amyloid enhancing factor exist? Is AEF a single biological entity? Amyloid Int J Exp Clin Invest. 1995;2:128–133. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kisilevsky R, Lemieux L, Boudreau L, Dun-Sheng Y, Fraser P. New clothes for amyloid enhancing factor (AEF): silk as AEF. Amyloid Int J Exp Clin Invest. 1999;6:98–106. doi: 10.3109/13506129909007309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kisilevsky R, Szarek WA, Ancsin JB, Elimova E, Marone S, Bhat S, Berkin A. Inhibition of amyloid A amyloidogenesis in vivo and in tissue culture by 4-deoxy analogues of peracetylated 2-acetamido-2deoxy-α- and β-D-glucose. Am J Pathol. 2004;164:2127–2137. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63771-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kluve-Beckerman B, Liepnieks WL, Benson MD. A cell culture system for the study of amyloid pathogenesis. Amyloid formation by peritoneal macrophages cultured with recombinant serum amyloid A. Am J Pathol. 1999;155:123–133. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65107-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Koolbergen DR, Hazekamp MG, Kurvers M, de Heer E, Cornelisse CJ, Huysmans HA, Bruijn JA. Tissue chimerism in human cryopreserved homograft valve explants demonstrated by in situ hybridization. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66(6):S225–S232. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01109-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Landman WJM. Amyloid Arthropathy in Chickens. Utrecht: Utrecht University; 1998. isbn: 90-393-1667-8. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Landman WJM, Gruys E. Amyloid arthropathy in an Indian peafowl. Vet Rec. 1998;142:90–91. doi: 10.1136/vr.142.4.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Lazo ND, Downing DT. Amyloid fibrils may be assembled from β-helical protofibrils. Biochemistry. 1998;37:1731–1735. doi: 10.1021/bi971016d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Liang J, Elliott-Bryant R, Hajri T, Sipe JD, Cathcart ES. A unique amyloidogenic apolipoprotein serum amyloid A (apoSAA) isoform expressed by the amyloid resistant CE/J mouse strain exhibits higher affinity for macrophages than apoSAA1 and apoSAA2 expressed by amyloid susceptible CBA/J mice. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1394:121–126. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2760(98)00102-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Li L, Darden TA, Bartolotti L, Kominos D, Pedersen LG. An atomic model for the pleated beta-sheet structure of Aβ amyloid protofilaments. Biophys J. 1999;76:2871–2878. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77442-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Linke RP. Highly sensitive diagnosis of amyloid and various amyloid syndromes using Congo red fluorescence. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat. 2000;436:439–448. doi: 10.1007/s004280050471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Linke RP, Nathrath WBL, Wilson PD. Immuno-electron microscopic identification and classification of amyloid in tissue sections by the postembedding protein-A gold method. Ultrastruct Pathol. 1983;4:1–7. doi: 10.3109/01913128309140567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Livneh A, Drenth JP, Klasen IS, Langevitz P, George J, Shelton DA, Gumucio DL, Pras E, Kastner DL, Pras M, et al. Familial Mediterranean fever and hyperimmunoglobulinemia D syndrome: two diseases with distinct clinical, serologic, and genetic features. J Rheumatol. 1997;24:1558–1563. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Lopez de la Paz M, Serrano L. Sequence determinants of amyloid fibril formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:87–92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2634884100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Lundmark K, Westermark GT, Nystrom S, Murphy CL, Solomon A, Westermark P. Transmissibility of systemic amyloidosis by a prion-like mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;100:679–684. doi: 10.1073/pnas.092205999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.MacRaild CA, Stewart CR, Mok YF, Gunzburg MJ, Perugini MA, Lawrence LJ, Tirtaatmadja V, Cooper-White JJ, Howlett GJ. Non-fibrillar components of amyloid deposits mediate the self-association and tangling of amyloid fibrils. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:21038–21045. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M314008200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Magnus JH. Isolation and Characterization of Amyloid Associated Glycosaminoglycans and Proteoglycans from Human Tissues. Tromso: University of Tromso; 1991. isbn: 82-7589-014-4. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Magy N, Liepnieks JJ, Benson MD, Kluve-Beckerman B. Amyloid-enhancing factor mediates amyloid formation on fibroblasts via a nidus/template mechanism. Arthr Rheum. 2003;48:1430–1437. doi: 10.1002/art.10964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ma Z, Westermark GT, Johnson KH, O’Brien TD, Westermark P. Quantitative immunohistochemical analysis of islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) in normal, impaired glucose tolerant, and diabetic cats. Amyloid Int J Exp Clin Invest. 1998;5:255–261. doi: 10.3109/13506129809007298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.McDonald TL, Larson MA, Mack DR, Weber A. Elevated extrahepatic expression and secretion of mammary-associated serum amyloid A 3 (M-SAA3) into colostrum. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2001;83:203–211. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2427(01)00380-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Mihara M, Shiina M, Nishimoto N, Yoshizaki K, Kishimoto T, Akamatsu K. Anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody inhibits murine AA-amyloidosis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:1132–1138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Miller SR, Sekijima Y, Kelly JW. Native state stabilization by NSAIDs inhibits transthyretin amyloidogenesis from the most common familial disease variants. Lab Invest. 2004;84:545–552. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Minor RR. Collagen metabolism. Am J Pathol. 1980;98:227–277. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Muller WE, Koch S, Eckert A, Hartmann H, Scheuer K. β-Amyloid peptide decreases membrane fluidity. Brain Res. 1995;674:133–136. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)01463-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Neves J, Abecassis M, Santiago T, Ramos T, Melo J, Gruys E, Hulskamp-Koch C, Ultee A, Verkaar ELC, Lenstra JA, et al. Processing of ovine cardiac valve allografts: 3. Implantation following antimicrobial treatment and preservation. Cell Tiss Bank. 2002;3:105–119. doi: 10.1023/A:1022819115765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Niewold TA. Pathogenesis of AA-amyloidosis. Utrecht: Utrecht University; 1990. isbn: 90-9003814-0. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Niewold TA, Hol PR, van Andel AC, Lutz ETG, Gruys E. Enhancement of amyloid induction by amyloid fibril fragments in hamster. Lab Invest. 1987;56:544–549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Niewold TA, Flores LJM, van den Heuvel LPWJ, Ultee A, Tooten PCJ, Veerkamp JH. Characterization of proteoglycans and glycosamino- glycans in bovine renal AA-type amyloidosis. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol. 1991;60:321–328. doi: 10.1007/BF02899563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Niewold TA, Murphy CL, Hulskamp-Koch CAM, Tooten PCJ, Gruys E. Casein related amyloid, characterization of a new and unique amyloid protein isolated from bovine corpora amylacea. Amyloid Int J Exp Clin Invest. 1999;6:244–249. doi: 10.3109/13506129909007335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Niewold TA, van der Linde-Sipman JS, Murphy CL, Tooten PCJ, Gruys E. Familial amyloidosis in cats: Siamese and Abyssinian AA proteins differ in primary sequence and pattern of deposition. Amyloid Int J Exp Clin Invest. 1999;6:205–209. doi: 10.3109/13506129909007328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Ovelgönne JH, Landman WJM, van den Boogaard AEJM, et al. Two Breeds of Chicken with Different Susceptibility to An Amyloidogenic Strain of Enterococcus Faecalis Appear to Have Identical SAAs. In: Kyle RA, Gertz MA, et al., editors. Amyloid and Amyloidosis 1998. New York: Parthenon; 1999. pp. 390–392. [Google Scholar]
- 94.Papaioannou N, Tooten PCJ, Van Ederen AM, Bohl JRE, Rofina J, Tsangaris T, Gruys E. Immunohistochemical investigation of the brain of aged dogs. I. Detection of neurofibrillary tangles and of 4-hydroxynonenal protein, an oxidative damage product, in senile plaques. Amyloid J Prot Fold Dis. 2001;8:11–21. doi: 10.3109/13506120108993810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Parry HB. In: Scrapie Disease in Sheep. Oppenheimer DR, editor. London: Academic Press; 1983. isbn: 0-12-545750-2. [Google Scholar]
- 96.Pearson GR, Wyatt JM, Gruffydd-Jones TJ, Hope J, Chong A, Higgins RJ, Scott AC, Wells GA. Feline spongiform encephalopathy: fibril and PrP studies. Vet Rec. 1992;131:307–310. doi: 10.1136/vr.131.14.307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Peperkamp NHMT, Landman WJM, Tooten PCJ, Ultee A, Voorhout WF, Gruys E. Light microscopic, immunohistochemical, and electron microscopic features of amyloid arthropathy in chickens. Vet Pathol. 1997;34:271–278. doi: 10.1177/030098589703400402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Permanne B, Adessi C, Saborio GP, Fraga S, Frossard MJ, Van Dorpe J, Dewachter I, Banks WA, Van Leuven F, Soto C. Reduction of amyloid load and cerebral damage in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s diseaase by treatment with a beta-sheet breaker peptide. FASEB J. 2002;16:860–862. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0841fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Phipps-Yonas H, Pinard G, Ali-Khan Z. Humoral proinflammatory cytokine and SAA generation profiles and spatio-temporal relationship between SAA and lysosomal cathepsin B and D in murine splenic monocytoid cells during AA amyloidosis. Scand J Immunol. 2004;59:168–176. doi: 10.1111/j.0300-9475.2004.01371.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Platz SJ, Breuer W, Geisel O, Linke RP, Hermanns W. Identification of lambda light chain amyloid in eight canine and two feline extramedullary plasmacytomas. J Comp Pathol. 1997;116:45–54. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9975(97)80042-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Pras M, Schubert M, Zucker-Franklin D, Rimon A, Franklin EC. The characterization of soluble amyloid prepared in water. J Clin Invest. 1968;47:924–933. doi: 10.1172/JCI105784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Priola SA. Prion protein and species barriers in the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Biomed Pharmacother. 1999;53:27–33. doi: 10.1016/s0753-3322(99)80057-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Prusiner SB. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science. 1982;216:136–144. doi: 10.1126/science.6801762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Prusiner SB, McKinley MP, Bowman KA, Bolton DC, Bendheim PE, Groth DF, Glenner GG. Scrapie prions aggregate to form amyloid-like birefringent rods. Cell. 1983;35:349–358. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90168-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Ramos-Vara JA, Miller MA, Pace LW, Linke RP, Common RS, Watson GL. Intestinal multinodular A-lambda amyloid deposition associated with extramedullary plasmocytoma in 3 dogs. Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical studies. J Comp Pathol. 1998;119:239–249. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9975(98)80047-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Ren Y, Reddy SA, Liao WS. Purification and identification of a tissue-specific repressor involved in serum amyloid A1 gene expression. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:37154–37160. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.52.37154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Rijkers DT, Hoppener JW, Posthuma G, Lips CJ, Liskamp RM. Inhibition of amyloid fibril formation of human amylin by N-alkylated amino acid and alpha-hydroxy acid residue containing peptides. Chemistry. 2002;8:4285–4291. doi: 10.1002/1521-3765(20020916)8:18<4285::AID-CHEM4285>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Roertgen KE, Lund EM, O’Brien TD, Westermark P, Hayden DW, Johnson KH. Apolipoprotein AI-derived pulmonary vascular amyloid in aged dogs. Am J Pathol. 1995;147:1311–1317. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Rofina JE, Papaioannou N, Van Andel I, et al. Cerebrovascular Amyloidosis May Cause A Decrease of Blood Supply Leading to Oxidative Damage and Formation of Amyloid Plaques in the Aged Canine Brain. In: Bely M, Apathy A, et al., editors. Amyloid and Amyloidosis IX. Budapest, Hungary: Apathy; 2001. pp. 445–447. [Google Scholar]
- 110.Rofina JE, Van der Meer I, Goossens M, et al. Preliminary Inquiry to Assess Behavior Changes in Aging Pet Dogs. In: Bely M, Apathy A, et al., editors. Amyloid and Amyloidosis IX. Budapest, Hungary: Apathy; 2001. pp. 464–466. [Google Scholar]
- 111.Rofina JE, Van Andel I, Van Ederen AM, Papaioannou N, Yamaguchi H, Gruys E. Canine counterpart of senile plaques near capillaries but lack of spatial relationship with activated microglia and macrophages. Amyloid J Prot Fold Dis. 2003;10:86–96. doi: 10.3109/13506120309041730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Romhanyi G. Selective differentiation between amyloid and connective tissue structures based on thew collagen specific topo-optical staining reaction with Congo red. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat. 1971;354:209–222. doi: 10.1007/BF00544254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Romhanyi G. Differences in ultrastructural organization of amyloid as revealed by sensitivity or resistance to induced proteolysis. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat. 1972;357:29–52. doi: 10.1007/BF00548215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Schreuder BEC. Epidemiological Aspects of Scrapie and BSE Including A Risk Assessment Study. Utrecht: Utrecht University; 1998. isbn: 90-393-1636-8. [Google Scholar]
- 115.Scott MR, Will R, Ironside J, Nguyen HO, Tremblay P, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Compelling transgenetic evidence for transmission of bovine spongiform encephalopathy prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:15137–15142. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.26.15137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Seelig J, Lehrmann R, Terzi E. Domain formation induced by lipid-ion and lipid-peptide interactions. Mol Membr Biol. 1995;12:51–57. doi: 10.3109/09687689509038495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Shtrasburg S, Pras M, Brezniak N, Dolitzki M, Livneh A. Pregnancy and amyloidogenesis: I. Offspring of amyloidotic mice are not predisposed to amyloidosis. J Lab Clin Med. 1999;134:168–172. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2143(99)90122-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Skoumalova A, Rofina J, Schwippelova Z, Gruys E, Wilhelm J. The role of free radicals in canine counterpart of senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Exp Gerontol. 2003;38:711–719. doi: 10.1016/s0531-5565(03)00071-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Snow AD, Willmer J, Kisilevsky R. Sulfated glycosaminoglycans: a common constituent of all amyloids? Lab Invest. 1987;56:120–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Snow AD, Kinsella MG, Parks E, Sekiguchi RT, Miller JD, Kimata K, Wight TN. Differential binding of vascular cell-derived proteoglycans (perlecan, biglycan, decorin, and versican) to the beta-amyloid protein of Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1995;320:84–95. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1995.1345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Spiro D. The structural basis of proteinuria in man. Electron microscopic studies of renal biopsy specimens from patients with lipid nephrosis, amyloidosis and subacute and chronic glomerulopathies. Am J Pathol. 1959;35:47–74. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Tagoe CE, French D, Gallo G, Buxbaum JN. Amyloidogenesis is neither accelerated nor enhanced by injections of preformed fibrils in mice transgenic for wild-type human transthyretin: the question of infectivity. Amyloid Prot Fold Disord. 2004;11:21–26. doi: 10.1080/13506120410001674982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Takahashi Y, Mihara H. Construction of a chemically and conformationally self-replicating system of amyloid-like fibrils. Bioorg Medicin Chem. 2004;12:693–699. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2003.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Taniyama H, Kitamura A, Kagawa Y, Hirayama K, Yoshino T, Kamiya S. Localized amyloidosis in canine mammary tumors. Vet Pathol. 2000;37:104–107. doi: 10.1354/vp.37-1-104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Tekin M, Yalcinkaya F, Cakar N, Akar N, Misirlioglu M, Tastan H, Tumer N. MEFV mutations in multiplex families with familial Mediterranean fever: is a particular genotype necessary for amyloidosis? Clin Genet. 2000;57:430–434. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.570605.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Telling GC. Prion protein genes and prion diseases: studies in transgenic mice. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2000;26:209–220. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2000.00253.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Torrent J, Alvarez-Martinez MT, Harricane MC, Heitz F, Liautard JP, Balny C, Lange R. High pressure induces scrapie-like prion protein misfolding and amyloid fibril formation. Biochemistry. 2004;43:7162–7170. doi: 10.1021/bi049939d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Van Andel ACJ, Hol PR, Van der Maas JH, et al. Reaggregation of Bovine Amyloid A Fibril Components to Beta-pleated Sheet Fibrillar Structures. In: Glenner GG, Osserman EF, Benditt EP, et al., editors. Amyloidosis. New York: Plenum Press; 1986. pp. 39–48. [Google Scholar]
- 129.Van Andel ACJ, Gruys E, Kroneman J, Veerkamp J. Amyloid in the horse: a report of nine cases. Equine Vet J. 1988;20:277–285. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1988.tb01524.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Van Andel ACJ, Niewold TA, Lutz ETG, et al. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy of Air-dried Heavy Water Suspended AA and AL Amyloid Fibril Preparations of Different Species. In: Isobe T, Araki S, Uchino F, et al., editors. Amyloid and Amyloidosis. New York: Plenum Press; 1988. pp. 45–50. [Google Scholar]
- 131.Van de Kaa CA, Hol PR, Huber J, Linke RP, Kooiker CJ, Gruys E. Diagnosis of the type of amyloid in paraffin wax embedded tissue sections using antisera against human and animal amyloid proteins. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat. 1986;408:649–664. doi: 10.1007/BF00705343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Van der Linde-Sipman JS, Niewold TA, Tooten PC, de Neijs-Backer M, Gruys E. Generalized AA-amyloidosis in Siamese and Oriental cats. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1997;56:1–10. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2427(96)05717-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Van Keulen LJM, Schreuder BEC, Meloen RH, Poelen-van den Berg M, Mooij-Harkes G, Vromans MEW, Langeveld JPM. Immunohistochemical detection and localization of prion protein in brain tissue of sheep with natural scrapie. Vet Pathol. 1995;32:299–308. doi: 10.1177/030098589503200312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Van Nostrand WE, Melchor JP, Ruffini L. Pathologic amyloid beta-protein cell surface fibril assembly on cultured human cerebrovascular smooth muscle cells. J Neurochem. 1998;70:216–223. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.70010216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Ventura S, Zurdo J, Narayanan S, Parreno M, Mangues R, Reif B, Chiti F, Giannoni E, Dobson CM, Aviles FX, et al. Short amino acid stretches can mediate amyloid formation in globular proteins: the Src homology 3 (SH3) case. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:7258–7263. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308249101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Virchow R. Ueber eine im Gehirn und Rückenmark des Menschen aufgefundene Substanz mit der chemischen Reaction der Cellulose. Virchows Arch Path Anat Klin Med. 1854;6:135–138. 268–271. (Ger). [Google Scholar]
- 137.WHO-IUIS Nomenclature sub-committee. Nomenclature of amyloid and amyloidosis. Bull World Health Org. 1993;71:105–108. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Wilesmith JW, Wells GA, Cranwell MP, Ryan JB. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy: epidemiological. Vet Rec. 1988;123:638–644. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Wilesmith JW, Ryan JB, Atkinson MJ. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy: epidemiological studies on the origin. Vet Rec. 1991;128:199–203. doi: 10.1136/vr.128.9.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Wimley WC, Hristova K, Ladokhin AS, Silvestro L, Axelsen PH, White SH. Folding of beta sheet membrane proteins: a hydrophobic hexapeptide model. J Mol Biol. 1998;277:1091–1110. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Wisniewski HM, Sigurdarson S, Rubenstein R, Kascsak RJ, Carp RI. Mites as vectors for scrapie. Lancet. 1996;347:1114. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90310-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Wright JR, Calkins E, Humphrey RL. Potassium permanganate reaction in amyloidosis. Lab Invest. 1977;36:274–281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Xing Y, Nakamura A, Chiba T, Kogishi K, Matsushita T, Li F, Guo Z, Hosokawa M, Mori M, Higuchi K. Transmission of mouse senile amyloidosis. Lab Invest. 2001;81:493–499. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Yu J, Guo JT, Zhu H, Kindy MS. Amyloid formation in the rat: adenoviral expression of mouse serum amyloid A proteins. Amyloid Int J Exp Clin Invest. 2000;7:32–40. doi: 10.3109/13506120009146822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Zekarias B, Landman WJM, Tooten PCJ, Gruys E. Leukocyte responses in two breeds of layer chicken that differ in susceptibility to induced amyloid arthropathy. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2000;77:55–69. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2427(00)00233-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]