Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1996 Sep;62(9):3203–3209. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.9.3203-3209.1996

Responses of Methanotrophic Activity in Soils and Cultures to Water Stress

S Schnell, G M King
PMCID: PMC1388933  PMID: 16535395

Abstract

Diffusive gas transport at high water contents and physiological water stress at low water contents limited atmospheric methane consumption rates during experimental manipulations of soil water content and water potential. Maximum rates of atmospheric methane consumption occurred at a soil water content of 25% (grams per gram [dry weight]) and a water potential of about -0.2 MPa. In contrast, uptake rates were highest at a water content of 38% and a water potential of -0.03 MPa when methane was initially present at 200 ppm. Uptake rates of atmospheric and elevated methane decreased when water potentials were reduced by adding either ionic or nonionic solutes to soils with a fixed water content. Uptake rates during these manipulations were lower when sodium chloride or potassium chloride was used to adjust water potential rather than sucrose. The response of methane consumption by soils to water potential was somewhat less pronounced than the response of methanotrophic cultures (e.g., Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b, Methylomonas rubra [= M. methanica], an isolate from a freshwater peat, and an isolate from an intertidal marine mudflat). However, unlike soils, methanotrophic cultures exhibited a stronger adverse response to nonionic solutes than to sodium chloride.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (261.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adamsen A. P., King G. M. Methane consumption in temperate and subarctic forest soils: rates, vertical zonation, and responses to water and nitrogen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Feb;59(2):485–490. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.2.485-490.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown A. D. Microbial water stress. Bacteriol Rev. 1976 Dec;40(4):803–846. doi: 10.1128/br.40.4.803-846.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bédard C., Knowles R. Physiology, biochemistry, and specific inhibitors of CH4, NH4+, and CO oxidation by methanotrophs and nitrifiers. Microbiol Rev. 1989 Mar;53(1):68–84. doi: 10.1128/mr.53.1.68-84.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. King G. M., Adamsen A. P. Effects of Temperature on Methane Consumption in a Forest Soil and in Pure Cultures of the Methanotroph Methylomonas rubra. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Sep;58(9):2758–2763. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.9.2758-2763.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. King G. M. Measurement of acetate concentrations in marine pore waters by using an enzymatic approach. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Dec;57(12):3476–3481. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.12.3476-3481.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. King G. M., Schnell S. Ammonium and Nitrite Inhibition of Methane Oxidation by Methylobacter albus BG8 and Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b at Low Methane Concentrations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Oct;60(10):3508–3513. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.10.3508-3513.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Le Rudulier D., Bouillard L. Glycine betaine, an osmotic effector in Klebsiella pneumoniae and other members of the Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Jul;46(1):152–159. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.1.152-159.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Le Rudulier D., Strom A. R., Dandekar A. M., Smith L. T., Valentine R. C. Molecular biology of osmoregulation. Science. 1984 Jun 8;224(4653):1064–1068. doi: 10.1126/science.224.4653.1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Perroud B., Le Rudulier D. Glycine betaine transport in Escherichia coli: osmotic modulation. J Bacteriol. 1985 Jan;161(1):393–401. doi: 10.1128/jb.161.1.393-401.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Roslev P., King G. M. Aerobic and anaerobic starvation metabolism in methanotrophic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Apr;61(4):1563–1570. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.4.1563-1570.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roslev P., King G. M. Survival and Recovery of Methanotrophic Bacteria Starved under Oxic and Anoxic Conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Jul;60(7):2602–2608. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.7.2602-2608.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schnell S., King G. M. Mechanistic analysis of ammonium inhibition of atmospheric methane consumption in forest soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Oct;60(10):3514–3521. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.10.3514-3521.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stark J. M., Firestone M. K. Mechanisms for soil moisture effects on activity of nitrifying bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Jan;61(1):218–221. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.1.218-221.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Whalen S. C., Reeburgh W. S., Sandbeck K. A. Rapid methane oxidation in a landfill cover soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Nov;56(11):3405–3411. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.11.3405-3411.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES