Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1996 Dec;62(12):4580–4586. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.12.4580-4586.1996

Enumeration and Biomass Estimation of Bacteria in Aquifer Microcosm Studies by Flow Cytometry

P C DeLeo, P Baveye
PMCID: PMC1389008  PMID: 16535470

Abstract

Flow cytometry was used to enumerate and characterize bacteria from a sand column microcosm simulating aquifer conditions. Pure cultures of a species of Bacillus isolated from subsurface sediments or Bacillus megaterium were first evaluated to identify these organisms' characteristic histograms. Counting was then carried out with samples from the aquifer microcosms. Enumeration by flow cytometry was compared with more-traditional acridine orange direct counting. These two techniques gave statistically similar results. However, counting by flow cytometry, in this case, surveyed a sample size 700 times greater than did acridine orange direct counting (25 (mu)l versus 0.034 (mu)l) and required 1/10 the time (2 h versus 20 h). Flow cytometry was able to distinguish the same species of bacteria grown under different nutrient conditions, and it could distinguish changes in cell growth patterns, specifically single cell growth versus chained cell growth in different regions of an aquifer microcosm. A biomass estimate was calculated by calibrating the total fluorescence of a sample from a pure culture with the dry weight of a freeze-dried volume from the original pure culture. Growth conditions significantly affected histograms and biomass estimates, so the calibration was carried out with cells grown under conditions similar to those in the aquifer microcosm. Costs associated with using flow cytometry were minimal compared with the amount of time saved in counting cells and estimating biomass.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (225.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bloem J., Veninga M., Shepherd J. Fully automatic determination of soil bacterium numbers, cell volumes, and frequencies of dividing cells by confocal laser scanning microscopy and image analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Mar;61(3):926–936. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.3.926-936.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Halvorson H. O., Ziegler N. R. Application of Statistics to Problems in Bacteriology: I. A Means of Determining Bacterial Population by the Dilution Method. J Bacteriol. 1933 Feb;25(2):101–121. doi: 10.1128/jb.25.2.101-121.1933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hitchens A. P., Leikind M. C. The Introduction of Agar-agar into Bacteriology. J Bacteriol. 1939 May;37(5):485–493. doi: 10.1128/jb.37.5.485-493.1939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lebaron P., Joux F. Flow cytometric analysis of the cellular DNA content of Salmonella typhimurium and Alteromonas haloplanktis during starvation and recovery in seawater. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Dec;60(12):4345–4350. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.12.4345-4350.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Moldavan A. PHOTO-ELECTRIC TECHNIQUE FOR THE COUNTING OF MICROSCOPICAL CELLS. Science. 1934 Aug 24;80(2069):188–189. doi: 10.1126/science.80.2069.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Porter J., Edwards C., Morgan J. A., Pickup R. W. Rapid, automated separation of specific bacteria from lake water and sewage by flow cytometry and cell sorting. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Oct;59(10):3327–3333. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.10.3327-3333.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Simon N., LeBot N., Marie D., Partensky F., Vaulot D. Fluorescent in situ hybridization with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes to identify small phytoplankton by flow cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Jul;61(7):2506–2513. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.7.2506-2513.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Steen H. B., Skarstad K., Boye E. DNA measurements of bacteria. Methods Cell Biol. 1990;33:519–526. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60551-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Vesey G., Hutton P., Champion A., Ashbolt N., Williams K. L., Warton A., Veal D. Application of flow cytometric methods for the routine detection of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in water. Cytometry. 1994 May 1;16(1):1–6. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990160102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Vesey G., Slade J. S., Byrne M., Shepherd K., Dennis P. J., Fricker C. R. Routine monitoring of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water using flow cytometry. J Appl Bacteriol. 1993 Jul;75(1):87–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb03413.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vesey G., Slade J. S., Byrne M., Shepherd K., Fricker C. R. A new method for the concentration of Cryptosporidium oocysts from water. J Appl Bacteriol. 1993 Jul;75(1):82–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb03412.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Völsch A., Nader W. F., Geiss H. K., Nebe G., Birr C. Detection and analysis of two serotypes of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in sewage plants by flow cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Aug;56(8):2430–2435. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.8.2430-2435.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wallner G., Erhart R., Amann R. Flow cytometric analysis of activated sludge with rRNA-targeted probes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 May;61(5):1859–1866. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.5.1859-1866.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yagoda-Shagam J., Barton L. L., Reed W. P., Chiovetti R. Fluorescein Isothiocyanate-Labeled Lectin Analysis of the Surface of the Nitrogen-Fixing Bacterium Azospirillum brasilense by Flow Cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Jul;54(7):1831–1837. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.7.1831-1837.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES