Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1997 Sep;63(9):3643–3647. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.9.3643-3647.1997

Ecological Implications of an Improved Direct Viable Count Method for Aquatic Bacteria

F Joux, P Lebaron
PMCID: PMC1389250  PMID: 16535694

Abstract

The direct viable count method first described by Kogure et al. (Can. J. Microbiol. 25:415-420, 1979) was improved by using an antibiotic cocktail instead of nalidixic acid alone. We screened 100 marine isolates from two coastal areas for their sensitivities to five replication-inhibiting antibiotics, including four quinolones (nalidixic, piromidic, and pipemidic acids and ciprofloxacin) and one (beta)-lactam (cephalexin). It was shown that growth inhibition of all isolates cannot be readily achieved by using a single antibiotic. Inhibition was much more efficient when all the antibiotics were combined, making it possible to use this method with natural communities. In combination, the concentration of each antibiotic could be lowered and the incubation time could be increased without any growth. Under such conditions, it was shown that the fraction of substrate-responsive cells within natural marine communities is much greater (1 to 2 orders of magnitude) than those reported by traditional procedures. Furthermore, the new procedure made substrate-responsive cells more clearly distinguishable. These improvements resulted in an increased incubation time and were related to metabolic expression of slow-growing cells and/or to the recovery of starved cells. The increased fraction of viable cells within marine communities has ecological implications on the metabolic role of nonculturable cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (243.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bianchi A., Giuliano L. Enumeration of viable bacteria in the marine pelagic environment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Jan;62(1):174–177. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.1.174-177.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buchrieser C., Kaspar C. W. An improved direct viable count for the enumeration of bacteria in milk. Int J Food Microbiol. 1993 Dec;20(4):227–237. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(93)90167-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Button D. K., Schut F., Quang P., Martin R., Robertson B. R. Viability and isolation of marine bacteria by dilution culture: theory, procedures, and initial results. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Mar;59(3):881–891. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.3.881-891.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Byrd J. J., Xu H. S., Colwell R. R. Viable but nonculturable bacteria in drinking water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Mar;57(3):875–878. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.3.875-878.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coallier J., Prévost M., Rompré A., Duchesne D. The optimization and application of two direct viable count methods for bacteria in distributed drinking water. Can J Microbiol. 1994 Oct;40(10):830–836. doi: 10.1139/m94-132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferguson R. L., Buckley E. N., Palumbo A. V. Response of marine bacterioplankton to differential filtration and confinement. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Jan;47(1):49–55. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.1.49-55.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Furet Y. X., Pechère J. C. Usual and unusual antibacterial effects of quinolones. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Oct;26 (Suppl B):7–15. doi: 10.1093/jac/26.suppl_b.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. GOSS W. A., DEITZ W. H., COOK T. M. MECHANISM OF ACTION OF NALIDIXIC ACID ON ESCHERICHIA COLI. J Bacteriol. 1964 Oct;88:1112–1118. doi: 10.1128/jb.88.4.1112-1118.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heissenberger A., Leppard G. G., Herndl G. J. Relationship between the Intracellular Integrity and the Morphology of the Capsular Envelope in Attached and Free-Living Marine Bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Dec;62(12):4521–4528. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.12.4521-4528.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kogure K., Simidu U., Taga N. A tentative direct microscopic method for counting living marine bacteria. Can J Microbiol. 1979 Mar;25(3):415–420. doi: 10.1139/m79-063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kogure K., Simidu U., Taga N., Colwell R. R. Correlation of direct viable counts with heterotrophic activity for marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Oct;53(10):2332–2337. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.10.2332-2337.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lebaron P., Roux V., Lett M. C., Baleux B. Effects of pili rigidity and energy availability on conjugative plasmid transfer in aquatic environments. Microb Releases. 1993 Dec;2(3):127–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Maki J. S., Remsen C. C. Comparison of two direct-count methods for determining metabolizing bacteria in freshwater. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 May;41(5):1132–1138. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.5.1132-1138.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Quinn J. P. The modification and evaluation of some cytochemical techniques for the enumeration of metabolically active heterotrophic bacteria in the aquatic environment. J Appl Bacteriol. 1984 Aug;57(1):51–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1984.tb02355.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rodriguez G. G., Phipps D., Ishiguro K., Ridgway H. F. Use of a fluorescent redox probe for direct visualization of actively respiring bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Jun;58(6):1801–1808. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.6.1801-1808.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Roszak D. B., Colwell R. R. Metabolic activity of bacterial cells enumerated by direct viable count. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Dec;53(12):2889–2893. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.12.2889-2893.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tabor P. S., Neihof R. A. Direct determination of activities for microorganisms of chesapeake bay populations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Nov;48(5):1012–1019. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.5.1012-1019.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tabor P. S., Neihof R. A. Improved microautoradiographic method to determine individual microorganisms active in substrate uptake in natural waters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Oct;44(4):945–953. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.4.945-953.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Torrella F., Morita R. Y. Microcultural study of bacterial size changes and microcolony and ultramicrocolony formation by heterotrophic bacteria in seawater. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Feb;41(2):518–527. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.2.518-527.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wise R., Andrews J. M., Edwards L. J. In vitro activity of Bay 09867, a new quinoline derivative, compared with those of other antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Apr;23(4):559–564. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.4.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zweifel U. L., Hagstrom A. Total counts of marine bacteria include a large fraction of non-nucleoid-containing bacteria (ghosts). Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Jun;61(6):2180–2185. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.6.2180-2185.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES