Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1970 Sep;210(1):17–43. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009194

Electrical interaction between antidromically stimulated frog motoneurones and dorsal root afferents: enhancement by gallamine and TEA

Alan D Grinnell
PMCID: PMC1395640  PMID: 5500776

Abstract

1. Electrical interactions have been studied in the isolated frog spinal cord preparation. It is found that gallamine and tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA) markedly enhance all non-cholinergic synaptic interactions, including the electrical interaction between motoneurones (VR-VRP). In addition, in the presence of either of these drugs, a short-latency interaction is seen to exist between antidromically stimulated motoneurones and dorsal root afferents (early VR-DRP). The early VR-DRP is rarely seen in the absence of gallamine or TEA.

2. The early VR-DRP is of the same short latency as the VR-VRP and fulfils the same criteria for electrical interaction: it increases in amplitude with cooling from 17-10° C, it is not blocked by a wide variety of pharmacological blocking agents, and it is suppressed by both Mg2+ and Ca2+, with no antagonism of action between the two.

3. The early VR-DRP appears as a cluster of unitary events: all-or-none spikes conducted out the dorsal root fibres. No initial graded slow potentials are seen. Often there are two peaks in the response.

4. The early VR-DRP is facilitated by a dorsal root volley, with a time course normally intermediate between that of the orthodromic ventral root potential (DR-VRP) and the dorsal root potential (DR-DRP). This orthodromic facilitation apparently is achieved by increasing invasion of motoneurone dendritic trees and depolarization of dorsal root afferents toward threshold.

5. If the same ventral root is stimulated twice, or adjacent roots stimulated at different intervals, the second early VR-DRP, like the VR-VRP, is seen to be occluded for 10-20 msec, then facilitated to supranormal amplitudes. It is concluded that motoneurone dendrites are presynaptic to both interactions.

6. Evidence is presented that gallamine and TEA act by increasing the duration of activity both in axon terminals and in antidromically invaded motoneurones. Often second or multiple spikes result. The increased duration of depolarization can increase transmitter release at terminals and increase coupling at electrical junctions.

7. Possible morphological correlates for the two electrical interactions are discussed. It is speculated that the motoneurone interaction arises at numerous areas of close apposition between dendrites in dendritic `thickets', and that the early VR-DRP is mediated by fewer, lower-resistance, electrical junctions between dendrites and afferent nerve terminals.

Full text

PDF
17

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BROOKHART J. M., FADIGA E. Potential field initiated during monosynaptic activation of frog motoneurones. J Physiol. 1960 Mar;150:633–655. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Charlton B. T., Gray E. G. Comparative electron microscopy of synapses in the vertebrate spinal cord. J Cell Sci. 1966 Mar;1(1):67–80. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1.1.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Curtis D. R., Ryall R. W., Watkins J. C. The action of cholinomimetics on spinal interneurones. Exp Brain Res. 1966;2(1):97–106. doi: 10.1007/BF00234363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Decima E. E. An effect of postsynaptic neurons upon presynaptic terminals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 May;63(1):58–64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.63.1.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Decima E. E., Goldberg L. J. Centrifugal dorsal root discharges induced by motoneurone activation. J Physiol. 1970 Mar;207(1):103–118. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Decima E. E., Goldberg L. J. Time course of excitability changes of primary afferent terminals as determined by motoneuron-presynaptic interaction. Brain Res. 1969 Sep;15(1):288–290. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(69)90334-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Galindo A., Krnjević K., Schwartz S. Patterns of firing in cuneate neurones and some effects of Flaxedil. Exp Brain Res. 1968;5(2):87–101. doi: 10.1007/BF00238699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grinnell A. D. A study of the interaction between motoneurones in the frog spinal cord. J Physiol. 1966 Feb;182(3):612–648. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Halpern L. M., Black R. G. Flaxedil (gallamine triethiodide): evidence for a central action. Science. 1967 Mar 31;155(3770):1685–1687. doi: 10.1126/science.155.3770.1685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. KATZ B., MILEDI R. A STUDY OF SPONTANEOUS MINIATURE POTENTIALS IN SPINAL MOTONEURONES. J Physiol. 1963 Sep;168:389–422. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. KIRALY J. K., PHILLIS J. W. Action of some drugs on the dorsal root potentials of the isolated toad spinal cord. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1961 Oct;17:224–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1961.tb01282.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KOKETSU K. Action of tetraethylammonium chloride on neuromuscular transmission in frogs. Am J Physiol. 1958 Apr;193(1):213–218. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1958.193.1.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KUBOTA K., BROOKHART J. M. RECURRENT FACILITATION OF FROG MOTONEURONS. J Neurophysiol. 1963 Nov;26:877–893. doi: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Meij H. S., Holemans K. C. Inhibitory interaction between motoneurons of adjacent segments in the frog spinal cord. Exp Neurol. 1969 Feb;23(2):174–186. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(69)90054-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Meij H. S., Holemans K. C., Meyer B. J. Facilitatory and excitatory interaction between motoneurons of adjacent segments in the spinal cord of the frog. Exp Neurol. 1968 Apr;20(4):522–532. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(68)90106-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Orkand R. K., Nicholls J. G., Kuffler S. W. Effect of nerve impulses on the membrane potential of glial cells in the central nervous system of amphibia. J Neurophysiol. 1966 Jul;29(4):788–806. doi: 10.1152/jn.1966.29.4.788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Payton B. W., Shand D. G. Actions of gallamine and tetraethylammonium at the frog neuromuscular junction. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1966 Oct;28(1):23–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1966.tb01870.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. SALMOIRAGHI G. C., STEINER F. A. Acetylcholine sensitivity of cat's medullary neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1963 Jul;26:581–597. doi: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.4.581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sotelo C., Taxi J. Ultrastructural aspects of electrotonic junctions in the spinal cord of the frog. Brain Res. 1970 Jan 6;17(1):137–141. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(70)90315-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. TASAKI I., HAGIWAR A. S. Demonstration of two stable potential states in the squid giant axon under tetraethylammonium chloride. J Gen Physiol. 1957 Jul 20;40(6):859–885. doi: 10.1085/jgp.40.6.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. WASHIZU Y. Single spinal montoneurons excitable from two different antidromic pathways. Jpn J Physiol. 1960 Apr 29;10:121–131. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.10.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. WASHIZU Y. The effect of TEA on the electrical activities of spinal motoneurons. Jpn J Physiol. 1959 Sep 15;9:311–321. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.9.311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES