Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1971 Feb;212(3):777–799. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009356

Inward spread of activation in vertebrate muscle fibres

H González-Serratos
PMCID: PMC1395722  PMID: 5557071

Abstract

1. A method for detecting the activation of individual myofibrils or groups of myofibrils within an isolated muscle fibre is described. It consists in making all the myofibrils wavy by setting the fibre in gelatine and compressing it longitudinally; active shortening of myofibrils can then be recognized by the straightening out of the waves.

2. The time course of this straightening during a twitch was found by high-speed ciné micrography.

3. There is a delay of activation between the superficial and central myofibrils, from which the velocity of inward spread of activation can be found.

4. This velocity has a Q10 of 2, and is about 7 cm/sec at 20° C. The mechanism of the inward spread of activation is discussed.

5. On relaxation the waves reappear, showing that there is a spontaneous elongation of the myofibrils.

Full text

PDF
777

Images in this article

798-1Plate 1
on p.798-1
798-2Plate 2
on p.798-2
798-3Plate 3
on p.798-3
798-4Plate 4
on p.798-4

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABBOTT B. C., RITCHIE J. M. The onset of shortening in striated muscle. J Physiol. 1951 Apr;113(2-3):336–345. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adrian R. H., Costantin L. L., Peachey L. D. Radial spread of contraction in frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1969 Sep;204(1):231–257. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adrian R. H., Freygang W. H. The potassium and chloride conductance of frog muscle membrane. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;163(1):61–103. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BENNETT H. S. Modern concepts of structure of striated muscle. Am J Phys Med. 1955 Feb;34(1):46–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BLINKS J. R. INFLUENCE OF OSMOTIC STRENGTH ON CROSS-SECTION AND VOLUME OF ISOLATED SINGLE MUSCLE FIBRES. J Physiol. 1965 Mar;177:42–57. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clinch N. F. On the increase in rate of heat production caused by stretch in frog's skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1968 May;196(2):397–414. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. ENDO M. ENTRY OF A DYE INTO THE SARCOTUBULAR SYSTEM OF MUSCLE. Nature. 1964 Jun 13;202:1115–1116. doi: 10.1038/2021115b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eisenberg R. S., Gage P. W. Frog skeletal muscle fibers: changes in electrical properties after disruption of transverse tubular system. Science. 1967 Dec 29;158(3809):1700–1701. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3809.1700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Endo M. Entry of fluorescent dyes into the sarcotubular system of the frog muscle. J Physiol. 1966 Jul;185(1):224–238. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. FALK G., FATT P. LINEAR ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF STRIATED MUSCLE FIBRES OBSERVED WITH INTRACELLULAR ELECTRODES. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Apr 14;160:69–123. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1964.0030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. FATT P. AN ANALYSIS OF THE TRANSVERSE ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE OF STRIATED MUSCLE. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Mar 17;159:606–651. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1964.0023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. FATT P., KATZ B. An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1951 Nov 28;115(3):320–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. FRANZINI-ARMSTRONG C., PORTER K. R. SARCOLEMMAL INVAGINATIONS CONSTITUTING THE T SYSTEM IN FISH MUSCLE FIBERS. J Cell Biol. 1964 Sep;22:675–696. doi: 10.1083/jcb.22.3.675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. FREYGANG W. H., Jr, GOLDSTEIN D. A., HELLAM D. C., PEACHEY L. D. THE RELATION BETWEEN THE LATE AFTER-POTENTIAL AND THE SIZE OF THE TRANSVERSE TUBULAR SYSTEM OF FROG MUSCLE. J Gen Physiol. 1964 Nov;48:235–263. doi: 10.1085/jgp.48.2.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Falk G. Predicted delays in the activation of the contractile system. Biophys J. 1968 May;8(5):608–625. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(68)86511-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Freygang W. H., Jr Tubular ionic movements. Fed Proc. 1965 Sep-Oct;24(5):1135–1140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gordon A. M., Huxley A. F., Julian F. J. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(1):170–192. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. HILL A. V. Is relaxation an active process? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1949 Oct;136(884):420–435. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1949.0034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. HODGKIN A. L. A note on conduction velocity. J Physiol. 1954 Jul 28;125(1):221–224. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. HODGKIN A. L., HOROWICZ P. The effect of sudden changes in ionic concentrations on the membrane potential of single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1960 Sep;153:370–385. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. HUXLEY A. F., GORDON A. M. Striation patterns in active and passive shortening of muscle. Nature. 1962 Jan 20;193:280–281. doi: 10.1038/193280b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. HUXLEY A. F. Local activation of muscle. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1959 Aug 28;81:446–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1959.tb49326.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. HUXLEY A. F. MUSCLE. Annu Rev Physiol. 1964;26:131–152. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.26.030164.001023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. HUXLEY A. F., NIEDERGERKE R. Measurement of the striations of isolated muscle fibres with the interference microscope. J Physiol. 1958 Dec 30;144(3):403–425. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. HUXLEY A. F., PEACHEY L. D. The maximum length for contraction in vertebrate straiated muscle. J Physiol. 1961 Apr;156:150–165. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. HUXLEY A. F., TAYLOR R. E. Local activation of striated muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1958 Dec 30;144(3):426–441. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. HUXLEY H. E. EVIDENCE FOR CONTINUITY BETWEEN THE CENTRAL ELEMENTS OF THE TRIADS AND EXTRACELLULAR SPACE IN FROG SARTORIUS MUSCLE. Nature. 1964 Jun 13;202:1067–1071. doi: 10.1038/2021067b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. PODOLSKY R. J., COSTANTIN L. L. REGULATION BY CALCIUM OF THE CONTRACTION AND RELAXATION OF MUSCLE FIBERS. Fed Proc. 1964 Sep-Oct;23:933–939. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Peachey L. D. The sarcoplasmic reticulum and transverse tubules of the frog's sartorius. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jun;25(3 Suppl):209–231. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.3.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sandow A. Excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle. Pharmacol Rev. 1965 Sep;17(3):265–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Strickholm A. Local sarcomere contraction in fast muscle fibres. Nature. 1966 Nov 19;212(5064):835–836. doi: 10.1038/212835a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sugi H., Ochi R. The mode of transverse spread of contraction initiated by local activation in single frog muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Oct;50(9):2167–2176. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.9.2167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES