Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1966 Sep;186(1):97–109. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008022

An electrophysiological study of odour similarities of homologous substances

K B Döving
PMCID: PMC1395897  PMID: 5914260

Abstract

1. The activity of single bulbar units in the olfactory system of the frog was recorded extracellularly by means of micro-electrodes. The electro-olfactogram was recorded simultaneously from the receptor epithelium.

2. The olfactory epithelium was stimulated with substances of homologous series of normal aliphatic alcohols, acetates and ketones.

3. The effect on a bulbar unit was classified as excitatory or inhibitory, and the chi-square values calculated with one degree of freedom for all pairs in a given series. The statistical values obtained indicated the degree of similarity in olfactory stimulative properties between the odours.

4. The results show that the degree of similarity in olfactory properties is greatest among neighbouring substances and gradually decreases with increasing separation in chain length.

5. Significant rank correlation coefficients were found between the chi-square values and the molecular weight ratios for alcohols and acetates. The results are discussed in relation to psychophysical findings obtained with the same substances.

Full text

PDF
97

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADRIAN E. D. Sensory messages and sensation; the response of the olfactory organ to different smells. Acta Physiol Scand. 1953 Jun 26;29(1):5–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1953.tb00990.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ADRIAN L. The action of the mammalian olfactory organ. J Laryngol Otol. 1956 Jan;70(1):1–14. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100052609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DOEVING K. B. STUDIES OF THE RELATION BETWEEN THE FROG'S ELECTRO-OLFACTOGRAM (EOG) AND SINGLE UNIT ACTIVITY IN THE OLFACTORY BULB. Acta Physiol Scand. 1964 Jan-Feb;60:150–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1964.tb02878.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Döving K. B. Studies on the responses of bulbar neurons of frog to different odour stimuli. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 1965 Oct;86(Suppl):845–854. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gesteland R. C., Lettvin J. Y., Pitts W. H. Chemical transmission in the nose of the frog. J Physiol. 1965 Dec;181(3):525–559. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. OTTOSON D. Analysis of the electrical activity of the olfactory epithelium. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1955;35(122):1–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. OTTOSON D. Comparison of slow potentials evoked in the frog's nasal mucosa and olfactory bulb by natural stimulation. Acta Physiol Scand. 1959 Nov 15;47:149–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1960.tb00065.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. OTTOSON D. Some aspects of the function of the olfactory system. Pharmacol Rev. 1963 Mar;15:1–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. OTTOSON D. Studies on slow potentials in the rabbit's olfactory bulb and nasal mucosa. Acta Physiol Scand. 1959 Nov 15;47:136–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1960.tb00064.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SCHUTZ H. G. A MATCHING-STANDARDS METHOD FOR CHARACTERIZING ODOR QUALITIES. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Jul 30;116:517–526. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb45081.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. WRIGHT R. H., MICHELS K. M. EVALUATION OF FAR INFRARED RELATIONS TO ODOR BY A STANDARDS SIMILARITY METHOD. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Jul 30;116:535–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb45083.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES