Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1967 Jan;188(2):273–284. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008138

Mechanics of horizontal movement of the human eye

D S Childress, R W Jones
PMCID: PMC1396006  PMID: 6030520

Abstract

1. The mechanics of the muscle—eyeball system of the human has been re-investigated by careful examination of the motion of the eye after it is mechanically adducted and released by means of a suction contact lens attached to it.

2. Orbital stiffness during adduction is found to be about 1·25 g/deg which is near the value of 1·2 g/deg reported by Robinson (1965) for abduction. However, the results also show that the stiffness decreases to 0·65 g/deg after approximately 5° of adduction.

3. It is concluded that for horizontal motion the globe may be considered as being in series with an elastic component which has a stiffness of 9·0 g/deg. This series elastance, arising from the extraocular muscles, muscle tendons, and from other orbital tissue appears to increase in stiffness as muscle innervation increases.

4. The experiments show that the muscle—eyeball system of the human is heavily damped which confirms the results of Robinson (1964).

5. Evidence is presented which indicates that the extraocular muscles are dominant factors in horizontal eye motion.

Full text

PDF
273

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABBOTT B. C., AUBERT X. M. The force exerted by active striated muscle during and after change of length. J Physiol. 1952 May;117(1):77–86. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BJORK A. Electromyographic studies on the coordination of antagonistic muscles in cases of abducens and facial palsy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1954 Oct;38(10):605–615. doi: 10.1136/bjo.38.10.605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BREININ G. M., MOLDAVER J. Electromyography of the human extraocular muscles. I. Normal kinesiology; divergence mechanism. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1955 Aug;54(2):200–210. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1955.00930020204006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DELEZE J. B. The mechanical properties of the semitendinosus muscle at lengths greater than its length in the body. J Physiol. 1961 Sep;158:154–164. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. JEWELL B. R., WILKIE D. R. An analysis of the mechanical components in frog's striated muscle. J Physiol. 1958 Oct 31;143(3):515–540. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. JEWELL B. R., WILKIE D. R. The mechanical properties of relaxing muscle. J Physiol. 1960 Jun;152:30–47. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Katz B. The relation between force and speed in muscular contraction. J Physiol. 1939 Jun 14;96(1):45–64. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1939.sp003756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ROBINSON D. A. A METHOD OF MEASURING EYE MOVEMENT USING A SCLERAL SEARCH COIL IN A MAGNETIC FIELD. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1963 Oct;10:137–145. doi: 10.1109/tbmel.1963.4322822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. ROBINSON D. A. THE MECHANICS OF HUMAN SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT. J Physiol. 1964 Nov;174:245–264. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Robinson D. A. The mechanics of human smooth pursuit eye movement. J Physiol. 1965 Oct;180(3):569–591. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stone S. L., Thomas J. G., Zakian V. The passive potatory characteristics of the dog's eye and its attachments. J Physiol. 1965 Nov;181(2):337–349. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES