Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1970 Jul;209(1):155–178. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009160

The representation of three-dimensional visual space in the cat's striate cortex

Colin Blakemore
PMCID: PMC1396035  PMID: 5499039

Abstract

1. Binocularly driven single units were recorded in the cat's striate cortex. For each neurone the two monocular receptive fields were stimulated simultaneously in order to assess the optimal positioning of the image in both eyes to give the best binocular response.

2. The electrode was driven perpendicular to the surface of the brain to explore cortical columns, all the cells of which are known to have the same preferred target orientation.

3. All orientation columns were found to fit into one of two classes according to their binocular organization.

4. In a constant depth column the receptive fields of binocular neurones cover a small retinal area and they are laid out in almost identical arrays in the two eyes. Consequently, the horizontal disparity is practically the same for all the units. The depth column as a whole is viewing a thin sheet of visual space, a few degrees wide, floating at some distance from the cat. There may be about 0·6° disparity difference between neighbouring depth columns.

5. In a constant direction column the binocular units' fields are all super-imposed on the retina contralateral to the hemisphere containing the column. In the ipsilateral eye they are more scattered horizontally. Therefore the horizontal disparity varies enormously from cell to cell and the column as a whole is viewing a cylinder of visual space directed towards the contralateral eye. Neighbouring direction columns may vary by about 4° in their oculocentric visual direction.

6. This columnar arrangement is probably important for space perception in the cat. Activity in only one depth and one direction column would specify the orientation and the three-dimensional locus of an object in space.

7. The two types of column may be involved in the control of disjunctive and conjugate eye movements.

Full text

PDF
155

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALPERN M., WOLTER J. R. The relation of horizontal saccadic and vergence movements. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1956 Nov;56(5):685–690. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1956.00930040693006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abeles M., Goldstein M. H., Jr Functional architecture in cat primary auditory cortex: columnar organization and organization according to depth. J Neurophysiol. 1970 Jan;33(1):172–187. doi: 10.1152/jn.1970.33.1.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BISHOP P. O., KOZAK W., VAKKUR G. J. Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field co-ordinates and optics. J Physiol. 1962 Oct;163:466–502. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barlow H. B., Blakemore C., Pettigrew J. D. The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol. 1967 Nov;193(2):327–342. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blakemore C., Pettigrew J. D. Eye dominance in the visual cortex. Nature. 1970 Jan 31;225(5231):426–429. doi: 10.1038/225426a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CROSBY E. C. Relations of brain centers to normal and abnormal eye movements in the horizontal plane. J Comp Neurol. 1953 Dec;99(3):437–479. doi: 10.1002/cne.900990302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Mar;28:229–289. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.2.229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160:106–154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. Shape and arrangement of columns in cat's striate cortex. J Physiol. 1963 Mar;165:559–568. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hubel D. H. Tungsten Microelectrode for Recording from Single Units. Science. 1957 Mar 22;125(3247):549–550. doi: 10.1126/science.125.3247.549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Anatomical demonstration of columns in the monkey striate cortex. Nature. 1969 Feb 22;221(5182):747–750. doi: 10.1038/221747a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol. 1968 Mar;195(1):215–243. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Stereoscopic vision in macaque monkey. Cells sensitive to binocular depth in area 18 of the macaque monkey cortex. Nature. 1970 Jan 3;225(5227):41–42. doi: 10.1038/225041a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. JAMPEL R. S. Convergence, divergence, pupillary reactions and accommodation of the eyes from faradic stimulation of the macaque brain. J Comp Neurol. 1960 Dec;115:371–399. doi: 10.1002/cne.901150306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MEIKLE T. H., Jr, SPRAGUE J. M. THE NEURAL ORGANIZATION OF THE VISUAL PATHWAYS IN THE CAT. Int Rev Neurobiol. 1964;6:149–189. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7742(08)60769-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MOUNTCASTLE V. B. Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic sensory cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1957 Jul;20(4):408–434. doi: 10.1152/jn.1957.20.4.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nikara T., Bishop P. O., Pettigrew J. D. Analysis of retinal correspondence by studying receptive fields of binocular single units in cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res. 1968;6(4):353–372. doi: 10.1007/BF00233184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. OTSUKA R., HASSLER R. [On the structure and segmentation of the cortical center of vision in the cat]. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr Z Gesamte Neurol Psychiatr. 1962;203:212–234. doi: 10.1007/BF00352744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pettigrew J. D., Nikara T., Bishop P. O. Binocular interaction on single units in cat striate cortex: simultaneous stimulation by single moving slit with receptive fields in correspondence. Exp Brain Res. 1968;6(4):391–410. doi: 10.1007/BF00233186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. RASHBASS C., WESTHEIMER G. Disjunctive eye movements. J Physiol. 1961 Dec;159:339–360. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sakata H., Miyamoto J. Topographic relationship between the receptive fields of neurons in the motor cortex and the movements elicited by focal stimulation in freely moving cats. Jpn J Physiol. 1968 Aug 15;18(4):489–507. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.18.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. WESTHEIMER G., MITCHELL A. M. Eye movement responses to convergence stimuli. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1956 Jun;55(6):848–856. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1956.00930030852012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. WESTHEIMER G. Mechanism of saccadic eye movements. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1954 Nov;52(5):710–724. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1954.00920050716006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES