Abstract
1. Responses of 122 on-centre or off-centre ganglion cells in cat to suprathreshold monochromatic stimulation have been analysed under mesopic adaptation with white light, recording from their single fibres in the optic tract at a level posterior to the chiasma. Fields described are monocularly driven, located in the right half-fields of either eye, and are all within 30° of the area centralis.
2. Retinal receptors are of two types, viz. 556 nm cones and 502 nm rods. At high mesopic adaptation (1 log cd/m2) all units receive mixed cone—rod input. Under low mesopic adaptation (0 log cd/m2) the great majority receive mixed input; a few receive pure rod input. These results are in agreement with the threshold data (Andrews & Hammond, 1970).
3. Peaks of spectral response curves of units, to suprathreshold monochromatic stimuli of different wave-length but equal quantum flux, fall primarily between 550 and 560 nm for high mesopic adaptation, and between 500 and 520 nm for low mesopic adaptation. Peak position depends on the degree of rod or cone contamination, in units treated under high or low mesopic levels respectively.
4. Units with cone—rod input to the field centre receive similar but antagonistic cone—rod input to the surround. In units with pure rod input to the field centre, only rods input to the surround.
5. Cone and rod components of on-centre discharges are identifiable in terms of colour sensitivity and latency. The cone component is primarily a short-latency, high-frequency, excitatory transient; the rod component is a longer latency, lower frequency, maintained phase of excitation.
6. Less direct evidence indicates that cone and rod input to the field surround give rise to inhibitory components of comparable latency, magnitude and time course.
7. The identified cone and rod components of responses are used in further experiments to show that cone and rod input have different spatial organization both in the receptive field centre and in the surround.
8. The boundary between the field centre and surround for rods has a diameter on average about twice as large as that for cones. This organization is such that the field centre for rods substantially overlies the cone surround.
9. Changes in receptive field organization occur within the mesopic range, associated with the changeover from cone to rod vision.
10. It is suggested that the difference between cone and rod input in the mesopic range may form the basis of the cat's ability behaviourally to discriminate between colours.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Andrews D. P., Hammond P. Mesopic increment threshold spectral sensitivity of single optic tract fibres in the cat: cone-rod interaction. J Physiol. 1970 Jul;209(1):65–81. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BARLOW H. B., FITZHUGH R., KUFFLER S. W. Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 6;137(3):338–354. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BARLOW H. B., FITZHUGH R., KUFFLER S. W. Dark adaptation, absolute threshold and Purkinje shift in single units of the cat's retina. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 6;137(3):327–337. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BISHOP P. O., KOZAK W., VAKKUR G. J. Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field co-ordinates and optics. J Physiol. 1962 Oct;163:466–502. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daw N. W., Pearlman A. L. Cat colour vision: one cone process or several? J Physiol. 1969 May;201(3):745–764. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GUNTER R. The spectral sensitivity of dark-adapted cats. J Physiol. 1952 Nov;118(3):395–404. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GUNTER R. The spectral sensitivity of light-adapted cats. J Physiol. 1954 Feb 26;123(2):409–415. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gouras P., Link K. Rod and cone interaction in dark-adapted monkey ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(2):499–510. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gouras P. The effects of light-adaptation on rod and cone receptive field organization of monkey ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1967 Oct;192(3):747–760. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hammond P. Spectral properties of dark-adapted retinal ganglion cells in the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa, L.). J Physiol. 1968 Apr;195(3):535–556. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MELLO N. K., PETERSON N. J. BEHAVIORAL EVIDENCE FOR COLOR DISCRIMINATION IN CAT. J Neurophysiol. 1964 May;27:323–333. doi: 10.1152/jn.1964.27.3.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SECHZER J. A., BROWN J. L. COLOR DISCRIMINATION IN THE CAT. Science. 1964 Apr 24;144(3617):427–429. doi: 10.1126/science.144.3617.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WEALE R. A. Photochemical reactions in the living cat's retina. J Physiol. 1953 Nov 28;122(2):322–331. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp005002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WEALE R. A. The spectral reflectivity of the cat's tapetum measured in situ. J Physiol. 1953 Jan;119(1):30–42. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WIESEL T. N. Receptive fields of ganglion cells in the cat's retina. J Physiol. 1960 Oct;153:583–594. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]