Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1967 Mar;189(1):163–176. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008161

Current spread in the smooth muscle of the guinea-pig vas deferens

T Tomita
PMCID: PMC1396044  PMID: 16992243

Abstract

1. The membrane polarization in response to intracellular stimulation and external stimulation, the junction potentials evoked by nerve and field stimulation and the spontaneous junction potentials were studied in the guinea-pig vas deferens.

2. The responses to intracellular stimulation differed from those to external stimulation applied through a large electrode in the following ways: short time constant of the electrotonic potential; linearity of current—voltage relation; all-or-none spike only in a small proportion of the cells; high critical firing level; short latency; weak tendency for repetitive activity during depolarization; and sharp spatial decay of the response.

3. The difference between intracellular and external stimulation could be explained by differences in current distribution in the tissue, if many muscle fibres were aggregated in functional bundles, with three-dimensional cell-to-cell connexions, so that the membrane near an intracellular stimulating electrode was shunted by a large area of surrounding membrane.

4. The time course of the junction potentials depended on the manner by which they were produced. The junction potential evoked by hypogastric nerve stimulation was recorded in every cell with almost the same amplitude. The spontaneous junction potential decayed very sharply with distance and the time course of the falling phase was about 10 times faster than that of the evoked junction potential.

The difference between the time course of the junction potentials was also explained by the difference in current distribution in the tissue.

Full text

PDF
163

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BURKE W., GINSBORG B. L. The electrical properties of the slow muscle fibre membrane. J Physiol. 1956 Jun 28;132(3):586–598. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BURNSTOCK G., HOLMAN M. E. Autonomic nerve-smooth muscle transmission. Nature. 1960 Sep 10;187:951–952. doi: 10.1038/187951a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BURNSTOCK G., HOLMAN M. E. Smooth muscle: autonomic nerve transmission. Annu Rev Physiol. 1963;25:61–90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.25.030163.000425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BURNSTOCK G., HOLMAN M. E. Spontaneous potential at sympathetic nerve endings in smooth muscle. J Physiol. 1962 Mar;160:446–460. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BURNSTOCK G., HOLMAN M. E. The transmission of excitation from autonomic nerve to smooth muscle. J Physiol. 1961 Jan;155:115–133. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CRANEFIELD P. F., HOFFMAN B. F. Propagated repolarization in heart muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1958 Mar 20;41(4):633–649. doi: 10.1085/jgp.41.4.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DUDEL J., KUFFLER S. W. The quantal nature of transmission and spontaneous miniature potentials at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1961 Mar;155:514–529. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ECCLES J. C., JAEGER J. C. The relationship between the mode of operation and the dimensions of the junctional regions at synapses and motor end-organs. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1958 Jan 1;148(930):38–56. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1958.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Elmqvist D., Feldman D. S. Spontaneous activity at a mammalian neuromuscular junction in tetrodotoxin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1965 Aug;64(4):475–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1965.tb04206.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. FATT P., KATZ B. An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1951 Nov 28;115(3):320–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hashimoto Y., Holman M. E., Tille J. Electrical properties of the smooth muscle membrane of the guinea-pig vas deferens. J Physiol. 1966 Sep;186(1):27–41. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. JOHNSON E. A., TILLE J. Changes in polarisation resistance during the repolarisation phase of the rabbit ventricular action potential. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1960 Dec;38:509–513. doi: 10.1038/icb.1960.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. JOHNSON E. A., TILLE J. Evidence for independence of voltage of the membrane conductance of rabbit ventricular fibres. Nature. 1961 Nov 18;192:663–664. doi: 10.1038/192663a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KURIYAMA H. EFFECT OF CALCIUM AND MAGNESIUM ON NEUROMUSCULAR TRANSMISSION IN THE HYPOGASTRIC NERVE-VAS DEFERENS PREPARATION OF THE GUINEA-PIG. J Physiol. 1964 Dec;175:211–230. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. KURIYAMA H. ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE MOTOR INNERVATION OF THE SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS IN THE GUINEA-PIG VAS DEFERENS. J Physiol. 1963 Nov;169:213–228. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. KURIYAMA H., TOMITA T. THE RESPONSES OF SINGLE SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS OF GUINEA-PIG TAENIA COLI TO INTRACELLULARLY APPLIED CURRENTS, AND THEIR EFFECT ON THE SPONTANEOUS ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY. J Physiol. 1965 May;178:270–289. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. NOBLE D. The voltage dependence of the cardiac membrane conductance. Biophys J. 1962 Sep;2:381–393. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(62)86862-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Noble D. Applications of Hodgkin-Huxley equations to excitable tissues. Physiol Rev. 1966 Jan;46(1):1–50. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1966.46.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Noble D., Hall A. E. The Conditions for Initiating "All-or-Nothing" Repolarization in Cardiac Muscle. Biophys J. 1963 Jul;3(4):261–274. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(63)86820-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nonomura Y., Hotta Y., Ohashi H. Tetrodotoxin and manganese ions: effects on electrical activity and tension in taenia coli of guinea pig. Science. 1966 Apr 1;152(3718):97–98. doi: 10.1126/science.152.3718.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tomita T. Electrical responses of smooth muscle to external stimulation in hypertonic solution. J Physiol. 1966 Mar;183(2):450–468. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tomita T. Membrane capacity and resistance of mammalian smooth muscle. J Theor Biol. 1966 Nov;12(2):216–227. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90114-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vayo H. W. Determination of the electrical parameters of vertebrate visceral smooth muscle. J Theor Biol. 1965 Sep;9(2):263–277. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(65)90112-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES