Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1967 Mar;189(1):31–42. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008153

An electrophysiological study of the effects of atropine and physostigmine on transmission to the guinea-pig vas deferens

Christopher Bell
PMCID: PMC1396047  PMID: 16992244

Abstract

1. The effects of physostigmine and atropine on transmission to the longitudinal musculature of in vitro preparations of the guinea-pig vas deferens have been examined using intracellular micro-electrodes.

2. Atropine (5 × 10-7 to 10-6 g/ml.) increased the rate of decay of excitatory junction potentials (EJPs) in response to post-ganglionic stimulation.

3. Physostigmine (5 × 10-6 g/ml.) reduced the mean resting potential of the muscle cells from -60·5 to -51·5 mV and lowered the voltage of post-ganglionic stimulation necessary for initiation of an action potential in the muscle. In some but not all of the cells studied the time course of the EJP was markedly prolonged.

4. At concentrations which did not alter the response to post-ganglionic stimulation (5 × 10-7 to 10-6 g/ml.), physostigmine caused fully facilitated EJPs to appear with the first pulse of a preganglionic train of stimulation.

5. Atropine antagonized all the above effects of physostigmine.

6. Physostigmine (5 × 10-7 to 10-6 g/ml.) also lowered the voltage of preganglionic stimulation necessary for initiation of an action potential in the muscle. This effect was not antagonized by atropine.

7. The results are interpreted as being evidence for the existence of separate cholinergic and adrenergic motor fibres to the musculature of the guinea-pig vas deferens.

Full text

PDF
31

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BENTLEY G. A., SABINE J. R. THE EFFECTS OF GANGLION-BLOCKING AND POSTGANGLIONIC SYMPATHOLYTIC DRUGS ON PREPARATIONS OF THE GUINEA-PIG VAS DEFERENS. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1963 Aug;21:190–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1963.tb01515.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BENTLEY G. A. Studies on sympathetic mechanisms in isolated intestinal and vas deferens preparations. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1962 Aug;19:85–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1962.tb01429.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BHARGAVA K. P., KAR K., PARMAR S. S. INDEPENDENT CHOLINERGIC AND ADRENERGIC MECHANISMS IN THE GUINEA-PIG ISOLATED NERVE-VAS DEFERENS PREPARATION. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1965 Jun;24:641–650. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1965.tb01620.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BIRMINGHAM A. T., WILSON A. B. PREGANGLIONIC AND POSTGANGLIONIC STIMULATION OF THE GUINEA-PIG ISOLATED VAS DEFERENS PREPARATION. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1963 Dec;21:569–580. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1963.tb02024.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BURN J. H., DROMEY J. J., LARGE B. J. THE RELEASE OF ACETYLCHOLINE BY SYMPATHETIC NERVE STIMULATION AT DIFFERENT FREQUENCIES. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1963 Aug;21:97–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1963.tb01505.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. BURN J. H., RAND M. J. ACETYLCHOLINE IN ADRENERGIC TRANSMISSION. Annu Rev Pharmacol. 1965;5:163–182. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.05.040165.001115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. BURN J. H., WEETMAN D. F. The effect of eserine on the response of the vas deferens to hypogastric nerve stimulation. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1963 Feb;20:74–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1963.tb01298.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. BURNSTOCK G., HOLMAN M. E. AN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE ACTIONS OF SOME AUTONOMIC BLOCKING DRUGS ON TRANSMISSION IN THE GUINEA-PIG VAS DEFERENS. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1964 Dec;23:600–612. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1964.tb01613.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. BURNSTOCK G., HOLMAN M. E. Effect of denervation and of reserpine treatment on transmission at sympathetic nerve endings. J Physiol. 1962 Mar;160:461–469. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. BURNSTOCK G., HOLMAN M. E., KURIYAMA H. FACILITATION OF TRANSMISSION FROM AUTONOMIC NERVE TO SMOOTH MUSCLE OF GUINEA-PIG VAS DEFERENS. J Physiol. 1964 Jul;172:31–49. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. BURNSTOCK G., HOLMAN M. E. The transmission of excitation from autonomic nerve to smooth muscle. J Physiol. 1961 Jan;155:115–133. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bennett M. R., Merrillees N. C. An analysis of the transmission of excitation from autonomic nerves to smooth muscle. J Physiol. 1966 Aug;185(3):520–535. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Birmingham A. T. The potentiation by anticholinesterase drugs of the responses of the guinea-pig isolated vas deferens to alternate preganglionic and postganglionic stimulation. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1966 May;27(1):145–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1966.tb01650.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Burnstock G., Holman M. E. Junction potentials at adrenergic synapses. Pharmacol Rev. 1966 Mar;18(1):481–493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. CHANG V., RAND M. J. Transmission failure in sympathetic nerves produced by hemicholinium. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1960 Dec;15:588–600. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1960.tb00287.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. DELLABELLA D., BENELLI G., GANDINI A. ESERINE AND AUTONOMIC NERVOUS CONTROL OF GUINEA-PIG VAS DEFERENS. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1964 Dec;16:779–787. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1964.tb07410.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. ECCLES R. M., LIBET B. Origin and blockade of the synaptic responses of curarized sympathetic ganglia. J Physiol. 1961 Aug;157:484–503. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. JACOBOWITZ D., KOELLE G. B. HISTOCHEMICAL CORRELATIONS OF ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE AND CATECHOLAMINES IN POSTGANGLIONIC AUTONOMIC NERVES OF THE CAT, RABBIT, AND GUINEA PIG. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1965 May;148:225–237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. KURIYAMA H. ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE MOTOR INNERVATION OF THE SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS IN THE GUINEA-PIG VAS DEFERENS. J Physiol. 1963 Nov;169:213–228. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. OHLIN P., STROMBLAD B. C. Observations on the isolated vas deferens. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1963 Apr;20:299–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1963.tb01469.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. SJOSTRAND N. O. Effect of reserpine and hypogastric denervation on the noradrenaline content of the vas deferens and the seminal vesicle of the guinea-pig. Acta Physiol Scand. 1962 Nov-Dec;56:376–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1962.tb02513.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. TAKESHIGE C., VOLLE R. L. Bimodal response of sympathetic ganglia to acetylcholine following eserine or repetitive preganglionic stimulation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1962 Oct;138:66–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES