Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1978 Jun;187(6):606–610. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197806000-00004

Abdominal Drainage Following Appendectomy and Cholecystectomy

H Harlan Stone, C Ann Hooper, William J Millikan Jr
PMCID: PMC1396449  PMID: 646499

Abstract

Consecutive patients undergoing emergency appendectomy (283) or urgent cholecystectomy (51) were prospectively studied for the development of post-operative incisional or peritoneal sepsis. Severity of the original peritoneal infection was carefully recorded, while use of a Penrose dam to drain the peritoneum was randomized according to pre-assigned hospital number. Both aerobic and anaerobic cultures were taken from the abdomen at the time of operation as well as from all postoperative infectious foci. Results demonstrated no essential differences in incidence of wound and peritoneal infection following appendectomy for simple or suppurative appendicitis (187) or following cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (51). However, with gangrenous or perforative appendicitis (94), incisional and intra-abdominal infection rates were 43% and 45%, respectively, when a drain was used; yet only 29 and 13%, respectively, without a drain. These latter differences were significant (p < 0.001). In addition, intra-abdominal abscesses were three times as likely to drain through the incision than along any tract provided by the rubber conduit. Cultures revealed that hospital pathogens accounted for a greater proportion of wound and peritoneal sepsis after cholecystectomy and appendectomy for simple or suppurative appendicitis if a drain had been inserted than if managed otherwise. By contrast, a mixed bacterial flora was responsible for most infections following appendectomy for gangrenous or perforated appendicitis, irrespective as to use of a drain.

Full text

PDF
606

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bauer A. W., Kirby W. M., Sherris J. C., Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Apr;45(4):493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cerise E. J., Pierce W. A., Diamond D. L. Abdominal drains: their role as a source of infection following splenectomy. Ann Surg. 1970 May;171(5):764–769. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197005000-00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cruse P. J., Foord R. A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds. Arch Surg. 1973 Aug;107(2):206–210. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1973.01350200078018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Drake C. T., Goldman E., Nichols R. L., Piatriszka K., Nyhus L. M. Environmental air and airborne infections. Ann Surg. 1977 Feb;185(2):219–223. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197702000-00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Everson N. W., Fossard D. P., Nash J. R., Macdonald R. C. Wound infection following appendicectomy: the effect of extraperitoneal wound drainage and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. Br J Surg. 1977 Apr;64(4):236–238. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800640403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldberg I. M., Goldberg J. P., Liechty R. D., Buerk C., Eiseman B., Norton L. Cholecystectomy with and without surgical drainage. Am J Surg. 1975 Jul;130(1):29–32. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(75)90451-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldstein H. S., Kredi R., Cecil F., Wolcott M. W. Drains at the suture line. Surgery. 1966 Oct;60(4):908–911. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haller J. A., Jr, Shaker I. J., Donahoo J. S., Schnaufer L., White J. J. Peritoneal drainage versus non-drainage for generalized peritonitis from ruptured appendicitis in children: a prospective study. Ann Surg. 1973 May;177(5):595–600. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hanna E. A. Efficiency of peritoneal drainage. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1970 Nov;131(5):983–985. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hermann G. Intraperitoneal drainage. Surg Clin North Am. 1969 Dec;49(6):1279–1288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Magarey C. J., Chant A. D., Rickford C. R., Margarey J. R. Peritoneal drainage and systemic antibiotics after appendicectomy. A prospective trial. Lancet. 1971 Jul 24;2(7717):179–182. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(71)90894-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McGowan J. E., Jr, Parrott P. L., Duty V. P. Nosocomial bacteremia. Potential for prevention of procedure-related cases. JAMA. 1977 Jun 20;237(25):2727–2729. doi: 10.1001/jama.237.25.2727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nora P. F., Vanecko R. M., Bransfield J. J. Prophylactic abdominal drains. Arch Surg. 1972 Aug;105(2):173–176. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1972.04180080027005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Normann E., Korvald E., Lotveit T. Perforated appendicitis--lavage or drainage? Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn. 1975;64(4):195–197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Olsen W. R., Beaudoin D. E. Wound drainage after splenectomy. Indications and complications. Am J Surg. 1969 May;117(5):615–620. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(69)90392-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ross F. P., Quinlan R. M. Eight hundred cholecystectomies. A plea for many fewer drains. Arch Surg. 1975 Jun;110(6):721–724. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360120039007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stone H. H., Hester T. R., Jr Incisional and peritoneal infection after emergency celiotomy. Ann Surg. 1973 Jun;177(6):669–678. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197306000-00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stone H. H., Kolb L. D., Geheber C. E. Incidence and significance of intraperitoneal anaerobic bacteria. Ann Surg. 1975 May;181(5):705–715. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197505000-00027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vakili C. Operative treatment of appendix mass. Am J Surg. 1976 Mar;131(3):312–314. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(76)90123-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES