Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2002 Nov;40(11):4056–4059. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.11.4056-4059.2002

Confirmation by 16S rRNA PCR of the COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for Diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infection in a Low-Prevalence Population

David J Diemert 1,*, Michael D Libman 1, Pierre Lebel 1
PMCID: PMC139689  PMID: 12409374

Abstract

The COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test is widely used for the diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection using genital swabs or urine samples. Although highly specific, cross-reactivity occurs with some nonpathogenic strains of Neisseria and Lactobacillus species. In low-prevalence populations, even highly specific assays may require confirmatory testing of positive results. We assessed the positive predictive value (PPV) of this test in a low-prevalence (0.5%) setting. Genital and urine specimens testing positive using the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test were retested using an investigational 16S rRNA PCR assay. Additionally, 737 specimens were tested in parallel by both culture and the above PCR protocol. Of 9,772 specimens tested in-house, 168 were positive by the AMPLICOR test; in addition, 62 AMPLICOR-positive specimens were referred to our laboratory for confirmatory testing, yielding 230 positive specimens. Of these, 72 were confirmed positive by 16S rRNA PCR, yielding a specificity of 98.7% and a PPV of 31.3%. Specificity was similar for all specimen types, whereas PPV varied with prevalence: specimens from males, females, urine specimens, and genital swabs had PPVs of 70.8, 13.3, 51.9, and 20.1%, respectively. The PPV was higher when the initial AMPLICOR optical density (OD) was ≥3.5 versus initial and repeat OD readings in an equivocal zone of ≥0.2 to <3.5 (65.1 versus 10.1%; P < 0.001). On repeat testing of specimens with ODs in the equivocal zone, 54 gave ODs of ≥0.2 and <2.0, 35 gave ODs of ≥2.0 and <3.5, and 12 gave ODs of ≥3.5, with 3.7, 20, and 33.3% confirmed positive, respectively (P = 0.004). Comparing PCR to culture as the “gold standard,” specificity increased from 96.8 to 99.9% when 16S rRNA PCR was performed on specimens positive by the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test. Confirmatory testing with a more specific method such as 16S rRNA PCR should be considered in low-prevalence populations, especially for specimens with an OD in the equivocal zone.


Neisseria gonorrhoeae remains the second most prevalent sexually transmitted bacterial infection after Chlamydia trachomatis, with approximately 650,000 new infections occurring annually in the United States (2). A significant proportion of these infections, especially in women, are asymptomatic and, if they remain undiscovered, may result in such long-term consequences as pelvic inflammatory disease, chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility (9). Furthermore, silent and untreated infection facilitates the spread of this organism to unsuspecting sexual partners. Therefore, accurate diagnosis of both symptomatic and asymptomatic infection is critical.

A number of techniques have been developed to detect genital infections caused by N. gonorrhoeae. The current “gold standard” for diagnosis of infection is by culturing endocervical or urethral swab specimens on selective media. However, even under optimal laboratory conditions, the sensitivity of gonococcal cultures ranges from 85 to 95% for acute infection (17) and falls to approximately 50% for females with chronic infections (1). Poor specimen collection, transport, and storage may contribute to false-negative results. Recently, nucleic acid amplification-based techniques, including the ligase chain reaction and PCR, have been shown to have both high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae (3, 11, 14, 15, 18). The COBAS AMPLICOR test for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae (COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG; Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, N.J.) is a fully automated multiplex PCR-based test that allows simultaneous detection of both pathogens in clinical specimens.

The COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test has demonstrated high sensitivity for detecting C. trachomatis infection using both urethral and endocervical swabs and urine specimens (6, 16, 19, 23). Studies on the utility of this test in diagnosing infection with N. gonorrhoeae have demonstrated sensitivities ranging from 92.4 to 100% for endocervical or urethral swabs and from 42.3 to 94.1% for urine specimens, while specificity has been high (95.9 to 99.9%) for all specimens (4, 5, 10, 13, 14, 20-22). The majority of these studies were performed in populations with a high prevalence (4.4 to 20.1%) of infection, resulting in positive predictive values (PPV) greater than 80%.

In areas of low prevalence, however, even highly specific assays may need confirmatory testing of positive results. In this study, the sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of the NG portion of the test (COBAS AMPLICOR NG) for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae infection was assessed using both genital swabs and urine specimens collected from subjects from a low-prevalence (0.5%) population by comparing results to those of culture and an investigational 16S rRNA PCR assay developed by Roche Molecular Systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient population.

Specimens were collected from consecutive patients undergoing investigation for N. gonorrhoea infection (both symptomatic and asymptomatic screening) at a diverse array of outpatient clinics affiliated with a large Montreal tertiary-care center serving both adults and children, as well as at two health centers in northern Québec serving a primarily Native Canadian population. Based on N. gonorrhoeae culture data from 1999, the overall prevalence of infection in this combined population was approximately 0.4%. In addition, a number of specimens were sent to our laboratory for confirmation of a positive COBAS AMPLICOR NG test performed elsewhere. Urethral or endocervical samples for N. gonorrhoeae culture were also collected from a subset of patients from the hospital-based clinics. Specimens were collected between June 1999 and November 2000.

Specimen collection and storage.

(i) DNA amplification.

Urethral, cervical, and first-pass urine specimens were collected, stored, and treated as described in the COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG product insert (Roche Diagnostic Systems Inc.). Samples collected from communities in northern Québec were frozen at −20°C for up to 1 week pending transportation to our laboratory.

(ii) N. gonorrhoeae culturing.

Urethral and endocervical swabs were collected and immediately placed in charcoal transport medium. Specimens were transported to the laboratory within 8 h, and often within 1 h, where they were inoculated onto modified Thayer-Martin and chocolate agar plates.

PCR methods.

The COBAS AMPLICOR N. gonorrhoeae PCR was performed on the automated COBAS instrument according to the manufacturer's instructions. For each processed specimen, the N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, and internal control (IC) target DNAs were amplified simultaneously in a single reaction mixture containing two primer pairs, one specific for C. trachomatis and the IC and one specific for N. gonorrhoeae. Amplification products were detected separately by hybridization to magnetic microparticles coated with N. gonorrhoeae-, C. trachomatis-, and IC-specific oligonucleotide probes. The 16S rRNA assay is an investigational method supplied by Roche Molecular Systems. The assay uses the N. gonorrhoeae 16S rRNA gene described by Rossau et al. that targets a region of the N. gonorrhoeae genome that is different from that targeted by COBAS AMPLICOR and is thought to be highly conserved within the species (16a). It was performed according to instructions from Roche Molecular Systems. Briefly, PCR was performed on a Perkin-Elmer GeneAmp 9600 thermocycler, with 38 cycles of 10 s at 91°C, 50 s at 62°C, and 35 s at 72°C. Amplicons were denatured and detected in an enzyme immunoassay system using microwell plates coated with specific DNA probes and an avidin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate.

Interpretation of results.

For the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test, specimens yielding an optical density (OD) of ≥0.2 units were interpreted as presumptively positive (as recommended by the manufacturer), regardless of the IC result. Specimens yielding an OD of <0.2 were considered negative, provided that the IC signal was equal to or above 0.2. Specimens yielding ODs below 0.2 for both the IC- and N. gonorrhoeae-specific reactions were interpreted as inhibitory. These specimens were retested by freezing and thawing an aliquot of the original specimen. Specimens were excluded from the analysis if they were repeatedly inhibitory.

Specimens with an N. gonorrhoeae signal of ≥0.2 and <3.5 were considered equivocal and were retested. Initially equivocal specimens were considered presumptively positive if two or more tests yielded OD readings of ≥0.2. All specimens considered presumptively positive by the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test then underwent testing by the 16S rRNA PCR assay. Interpretation of the results obtained from 16S rRNA PCR was similar to that of the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test, except that specimens with an N. gonorrhoeae signal of ≥0.2 and <0.8 were considered equivocal and repeated in duplicate. Initially equivocal specimens were interpreted as positive if at least two of three tests (including the original one) yielded N. gonorrhoeae signals of ≥0.2. Initially equivocal specimens were interpreted as negative if fewer than two tests yielded an OD of ≥0.2.

Gonorrhea culture.

Cultures were examined following 48 and 72 h incubation at 35°C in 5% CO2. N. gonorrhoeae was presumptively identified based on the appearance of typical colonies of gram-negative diplococci and positive oxidase and catalase reactions. The identities of presumptive N. gonorrhoeae isolates were confirmed by carbohydrate utilization profiles.

Statistical analysis.

The specificity and PPV of the COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG PCR compared to the 16S rRNA PCR were calculated for each type of specimen and according to the gender of the patient. Since some of the clinics performed their own COBAS AMPLICOR PCR and sent only positive specimens for 16S rRNA PCR testing, these specimens were not included in the specificity calculations (but were included in the PPV calculations) as the total number of COBAS AMPLICOR tests performed was unavailable for these laboratories. The significance of differences in specificity and PPV between subsets of specimens was assessed by the chi-square or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

From June 1999 until November 2000, 9,772 specimens from both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were tested for N. gonorrhoeae using the COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test. Of these, 168 (1.7%) specimens from 167 separate patient visits were presumptively positive and underwent confirmatory testing using the 16S rRNA assay. In addition, 62 specimens were referred in from other centers for confirmation (using the 16S rRNA assay) of a positive COBAS AMPLICOR NG test, yielding a total of 230 specimens that were presumptively positive. Of these specimens, 158 were from females and 59 were from males. There were 149 urethral or cervical swab specimens and 81 urine specimens.

Seventy-two specimens identified as presumptively positive for N. gonorrhoeae by COBAS AMPLICOR were confirmed positive by the 16S rRNA assay, yielding a specificity of 98.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 98.4 to 98.9%) and a PPV of 31.3% (95% CI, 25.4 to 37.7%) for the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test. Specificities were similar for all specimen types: 98.3% (95% CI, 97.9 to 98.6%) for female endocervical swabs, 98.8% (95% CI, 98.0 to 99.3%) for male urethral swabs, 99.2% (95% CI, 98.8 to 99.5%) for female urine specimens, and 99.2% (95% CI, 97.8 to 99.8%) for male urine specimens (Table 1). Specificities for the different specimen types were not significantly different except when female urine specimens and female endocervical swabs were compared (P = 0.001).

TABLE 1.

Specificity of COBAS AMPLICOR NG test versus 16S rRNA PCR test for detection of N. gonorrhoeae in clinical specimens

Specimen n Specificity (%) 95% Cl
Female endocervical 5,727 98.3 97.9-98.6
Male urethral 1,257 98.8 98.0-99.3
Female urine 2,397 99.2 98.8-99.5
Male urine 391 99.2 97.8-99.8
    Total 9,772 98.7 98.4-98.9

When analyzed according to gender and type of specimen, the PPV of the COBAS AMPLICOR result compared to the 16S rRNA assay varied with prevalence (Table 2). For specimens from men and women, the PPVs were 70.8% (95% CI, 58.9 to 81.0%) and 13.3% (95% CI, 8.4 to 19.6%), respectively, while for urine specimens and urethral or cervical specimens, the PPVs were 51.9% (95% CI, 40.5 to 63.1%) and 20.1% (95% CI, 14.0 to 27.5%), respectively. The PPV was highest when restricted to urine specimens from men (Table 2), at 82.9% (95% CI, 66.4 to 93.4%),and lowest for endocervical swabs obtained from women, at 7.1% (95% CI, 3.1 to 13.6%). The PPV for urine specimens from females was 28.3% (95% CI, 16.0 to 43.5%) and 59.5% (95% CI, 42.1 to 75.2%) for urethral swabs from men.

TABLE 2.

PPV of COBAS AMPLICOR NG test compared to that of 16S rRNA PCR

Specimen na PPV (%) 95% Cl
Male 72 70.8 58.9-81.0
    Urethral 37 59.5 42.1-75.2
    Urine 35 82.9 66.4-93.4
Female 158 13.3 8.4-19.6
    Endocervical 112 7.1 3.1-13.6
    Urine 46 28.3 16.0-43.5
Urine 81 51.9 40.5-63.1
Cervix or urethra 149 20.1 14.0-27.5
        Total 230 31.3 25.4-37.7
a

The number of specimens positive by COBAS AMPLICOR NG PCR that underwent confirmatory testing by 16S rRNA PCR.

Eighty-six specimens had an initial COBAS AMPLICOR OD reading of 3.5 or more, whereas 144 had initial readings in the equivocal zone of ≥0.2 and <3.5. One hundred two specimens with readings in the equivocal zone were retested by COBAS AMPLICOR before undergoing 16S rRNA PCR testing; the remainder underwent 16S rRNA testing before a second COBAS AMPLICOR test was performed (the PPV of the subset of samples that did not have a repeat COBAS AMPLICOR test was not significantly different from those that did [data not shown] [P = 0.5]). The PPV of the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test was significantly higher when the OD was ≥3.5 on initial testing (65.1% [95% CI, 54.8 to 75.4%]) than when both initial and repeat OD readings were within the equivocal zone (10.1% [95% CI, 3.7 to 16.5%]; P < 0.001) (Table 3). Upon repeat COBAS AMPLICOR NG testing of 102 specimens with an initial OD in the equivocal zone, 1 was inhibited. Fifty-four specimens gave ODs that were ≥0.2 but <2.0, 35 gave ODs that were ≥2.0 but <3.5, and 12 gave ODs that were ≥3.5. Within these subgroups, two (3.7%), seven (20.0%), and four (33.3%) specimens, respectively, were confirmed to be positive for N. gonorrhoeae DNA by 16S rRNA testing (P = 0.004).

TABLE 3.

PPV of COBAS AMPLICOR NG test based on OD

OD na PPV (%) 95% Cl
≥3.5 86 65.1 54.8-75.4
0.2-3.5 89b 10.1 3.7-16.5
a

The number of specimens positive by COBAS AMPLICOR NG PCR that underwent confirmatory testing by 16S rRNA PCR.

b

The number of specimens that were within the equivocal range both on initial and repeat COBAS AMPLICOR NG testing.

Comparison between PCR and culture.

From the 9,772 specimens that were tested using the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test, 737 endocervical and urethral specimens were also tested by conventional culture. These were collected from patients undergoing screening for sexually transmitted diseases from whom a specimen was collected for both COBAS AMPLICOR CT testing and N. gonorrhoeae culture, prior to the routine offering of the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test in our institution. Twenty-nine specimens were positive by the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test, of which seven were culture positive; no specimens were positive by culture but negative by COBAS AMPLICOR. This yielded a specificity of 96.8% (95% CI, 95.5 to 98.1%) and sensitivity of 100% for the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test (using a cutoff of 0.2). However, when 16S rRNA PCR confirmation was performed on specimens presumptively positive by COBAS AMPLICOR, the specificity of this testing algorithm increased to 99.9% (95% CI, 99.2 to 100%).

DISCUSSION

The results of this study confirm the high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (98.3 to 99.2%) of the COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae in endocervical, urethral, and urine specimens. Previous studies have demonstrated high sensitivities (92.4 to 100%) for endocervical swab specimens from women and urine specimens from symptomatic men, whereas sensitivities for urine specimens from women and asymptomatic men were somewhat lower, ranging from 42.3 to 88.3% (4, 14, 21). We could not make a precise estimate of sensitivity due to the low number of true positives in the 737 specimens that were evaluated by both culture and PCR.

The specificity of the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test was high for all types of specimens tested, ranging from 98.3% for endocervical swab specimens from women to 99.2% for urine specimens. Previous studies have reported similar specificities, with corresponding PPVs of more than 80% (4, 10, 13, 14). Although these specificities are high, there is controversy in the literature with respect to the methods used to calculate them, particularly in regards to the use of discrepant analysis (7, 8). In fact, Hadgu asserts that using a second DNA amplification test to resolve the discrepancy between a positive DNA amplification test and negative culture result may overestimate the specificity of the first PCR-based assay.

Regardless of this controversy, all of the previous studies reporting high PPVs for the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test were performed in populations with relatively a high prevalence of N. gonorrhoeae infection (4.4 to 20.1%). In contrast, the prevalence of infection in our subject population was 0.5% over the duration of the study period. Not surprisingly, therefore, the PPV of the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test was only 31.2% in this study. The PPV was highest for urine specimens from men (82.9%) and lowest for cervical swab specimens obtained from women (6.7%). These differences were entirely secondary to differences in prevalence, as the specificities were not markedly different between the different specimen types.

The use of an equivocal zone for the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test has been advocated by Martin et al. and Van Der Pol et al. based on the results of a large multicenter trial (14, 20). In this study evaluating the performance of the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test in the clinical setting, specificities ranged from 98.8 to 99.9% depending on the source of the specimen. This high specificity was obtained using an algorithm that required retesting specimens with OD readings that fell within a broad equivocal zone of 0.2 to 3.5 OD units; only those samples for which at least two out of three tests (including the initial test) produced signals of ≥2.0 OD units were interpreted as positive. Without this retesting algorithm, and using a cutoff of 0.2 OD units for a positive result, specificity fell to a range of 96.2 to 98.9%, depending on the type of specimen.

In the present study, all specimens yielding OD values within the equivocal zone were retested by 16S rRNA PCR. The PPV for specimens with an initial OD value of ≥3.5 was 65.1%, whereas for specimens with an OD consistently below 3.5 it was significantly lower (10.1%; P < 0.001). Our study confirms the finding that specificity increases continuously as the cutoff is increased from 0.2 to 3.5 OD units, to the detriment of sensitivity. This supports the adoption of Martin et al.'s algorithm using a higher cutoff of 2.0 OD units; however, this would have missed two (2.8%) true positives in our study. On the other hand, confirmatory testing of all specimens yielding COBAS AMPLICOR NG test OD readings within the equivocal zone between 0.2 and 3.5 would not compromise sensitivity.

The necessity of including a broad equivocal zone in the COBAS AMPLICOR NG testing algorithm may derive from cross-reactivity of the test's primers with certain nonpathogenic strains of Neisseria such as N. subflava and N. cinerea (5, 20). Although these organisms are considered commensal organisms of the upper respiratory tract, it has been postulated that transient carriage in the genital tract may occur (12). Specimens containing cross-reactive Neisseria strains may give signals above the negative cutoff of 0.2 units, but it has been suggested that due to minor DNA base pair differences in the probe region and low organism load, detection of the nonpathogenic Neisseria strains will give OD readings below 3.5 (20). Cross-reactivity has also been shown with Lactobacillus species, another commensal organism of the female genital tract (21). Interestingly, in the present study, specificity was slightly lower for female endocervical specimens, which would be the most likely to be contaminated with Lactobacillus.

In the study by Martin et al., only 2.9% of their specimens gave COBAS AMPLICOR NG test results within the equivocal zone versus 11% that had an OD of ≥3.5, leading them to assert that the additional testing burden of their retesting algorithm would be small. However, in our study, a much greater proportion (144 out of 230) of specimens with an OD of ≥0.2 had readings within the equivocal zone. This variability in the number of specimens yielding equivocal results likely relates to differences in NG prevalence—0.5% in our study versus 13% in the study of Martin et al.—between the two populations that were studied.

In summary, the COBAS AMPLICOR NG test is highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of infection with N. gonorrhoeae. However, in low-prevalence populations, the PPV of the test is low; this may be secondary to cross-reactivity with certain nonpathogenic strains of Neisseria or Lactobacillus, which becomes a more important concern as the prevalence of N. gonorrhoeae infection declines. There is no alternate OD cutoff or testing algorithm based solely on the use of COBAS AMPLICOR which would improve PPV while maintaining sensitivity; therefore, confirmatory testing with another, more specific assay such as the 16S rRNA PCR assay should be performed on all specimens with an OD of more than 0.2 in populations with a low prevalence of infection. Additionally, even in areas of higher prevalence, specimens yielding an OD reading between 0.2 and 3.5 should be considered for confirmatory testing, given the lower PPV of results within this equivocal zone.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bassiri, M., P. A. Mardh, M. Domeika, et al. 1997. Multiplex AMPLICOR PCR screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in women attending non-sexually transmitted disease clinics. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2556-2560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2000. Tracking the hidden epidemics. Trends in STDs in the United States, p. 2. CDC, Atlanta, Ga.
  • 3.Ching, S., H. Lee, E. W. Hook, III, M. R. Jacobs, and J. Zenilman. 1995. Ligase chain reaction for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urogenital swabs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:3111-3114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Crotchfelt, K. A., L. E. Welsh, D. DeBonville, M. Rosenstraus, and T. C. Quinn. 1997. Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary specimens from men and women by a coamplification PCR assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1536-1540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Farrell, D. J. 1999. Evaluation of AMPLICOR Neisseria gonorrhoeae PCR using cppB nested PCR and 16S rRNA PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:386-390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Goessens, W. H., J. W. Mouton, W. I. van der Meijden, S. Deelen, T. H. Rijsoort-Vos, N. Lemmens-den Toom, H. A. Verbrugh, and R. P. Verkooyen. 1997. Comparison of three commercially available amplification assays, AMP CT, LCx, and COBAS AMPLICOR, for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2628-2633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Green, T. A., C. M. Black, and R. E. Johnson. 1998. Evaluation of bias in diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity estimates computed by discrepant analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:375-381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hadgu, A. 1999. Discrepant analysis: a biased and an unscientific method for estimating test sensitivity and specificity. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 52:1231-1237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hook, E. W., III, and H. H. Handsfield. 1990. Gonococcal infections in the adult, p. 149-165. In K. K. Holmes et al. (ed.), Sexually transmitted diseases. McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y.
  • 10.Jungkind, D., S. Direnzo, K. G. Beavis, and N. S. Silverman. 1996. Evaluation of automated COBAS AMPLICOR PCR system for detection of several infectious agents and its impact on laboratory management. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2778-2783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kehl, S. C., K. Georgakas, G. R. Swain, G. Sedmak, S. Gradus, A. Singh, and S. Foldy. 1998. Evaluation of the Abbott LCx assay for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in endocervical swab specimens from females. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:3549-3551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Knapp, J., and R. J. Rice. 1995. Neisseria and Branhamella, p. 324-340. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  • 13.Livengood, C. H., III, and J. W. Wrenn. 2001. Evaluation of COBAS AMPLICOR (Roche): accuracy in detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by coamplification of endocervical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2928-2932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Martin, D. H., C. Cammarata, P. B. Van Der, R. B. Jones, T. C. Quinn, C. A. Gaydos, K. Crotchfelt, J. Schachter, J. Moncada, D. Jungkind, B. Turner, and C. Peyton. 2000. Multicenter evaluation of AMPLICOR and automated COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3544-3549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Palladino, S., J. W. Pearman, I. D. Kay, D. W. Smith, G. B. Harnett, M. Woods, L. Marshall, and J. McCloskey. 1999. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Genitourinary infections in males by the Amplicor PCR assay of urine. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 33:141-146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Puolakkainen, M., E. Hiltunen-Back, T. Reunala, S. Suhonen, P. Lahteenmaki, M. Lehtinen, and J. Paavonen. 1998. Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1489-1493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16a.Rossau, R., L. Heyndrickx, and H. Van Heuverswyn. 1988. Nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomal RNA gene from Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:6227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schmale, J. D., J. E. Martin, Jr., and G. Domescik. 1969. Observations on the culture diagnosis of gonorrhea in women. JAMA 210:312-314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Smith, K. R., S. Ching, H. Lee, Y. Ohhashi, H. Y. Hu, H. C. Fisher III, and E. W. Hook III. 1995. Evaluation of ligase chain reaction for use with urine for identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in females attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:455-457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Steingrimsson, O., K. Jonsdottir, J. H. Olafsson, S. M. Karlsson, R. Palsdottir, and S. Davidsson. 1998. Comparison of Roche Cobas Amplicor and Abbott LCx for the rapid detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in specimens from high-risk patients. Sex. Transm. Dis. 25:44-48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Van Der Pol, B., D. H. Martin, J. Schachter, T. C. Quinn, C. A. Gaydos, R. B. Jones, K. Crotchfelt, J. Moncada, D. Jungkind, B. Turner, C. Peyton, J. F. Kelly, J. B. Weiss, and M. Rosenstraus. 2001. Enhancing the specificity of the COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae by retesting specimens with equivocal results. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3092-3098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.van Doornum, G. J., L. M. Schouls, A. Pijl, I. Cairo, M. Buimer, and S. Bruisten. 2001. Comparison between the LCx Probe system and the COBAS AMPLICOR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:829-835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Van Dyck, E., M. Ieven, S. Pattyn, L. Van Damme, and M. Laga. 2001. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by enzyme immunoassay, culture, and three nucleic acid amplification tests. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:1751-1756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vincelette, J., J. Schirm, M. Bogard, A. M. Bourgault, D. S. Luijt, A. Bianchi, P. C. Voorst Vader, A. Butcher, and M. Rosenstraus. 1999. Multicenter evaluation of the fully automated COBAS AMPLICOR PCR test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:74-80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES