Skip to main content
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1978 Dec;188(6):743–747. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197812000-00005

A prospective randomized study of three expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts as small arterial substitutes.

O M Hastings, K M Jain, R W Hobson 2nd, K G Swan
PMCID: PMC1397008  PMID: 367297

Abstract

A prospective, double-blind, randomized study was performed to determine the relative patency rate of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts, Gore-Tex, Impra, and a Surgikos prototype PTFE graft. The 48 grafts (40 x 4 mm) replaced excised segments of femoral arteries in adult mongrel dogs, whose mean weight was 20.6 +/- 0.9 kg; the grafts were removed after 12 weeks. Sterile technique and antibiotic therapy were included in the study. Anticoagulation was not employed. Anastomoses were performed with 6 = 0 polypropylene. Angiographic assessment of each anastomosis was made at surgery and prior to sacrifice. Patency was assessed daily by palpation and Doppler flow signals, as well as angiographically, prior to sacrifice. The overall patency rate was 62.5%. There were no statistically significant differences in patency rates among the three groups (Gore-Tex, 56%; Impra, 75%, Surgikos, 56%). Histologic evaluation revealed incomplete neointima formation and significant pannus formation in all three types of grafts without any significant discernible difference among them. The results suggest that further experimental evaluation of PTFE, as a small vessel substitute, is indicated prior to its use clinically in preference to autogenous vein.

Full text

PDF
743

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Campbell C. D., Brooks D. H., Webster M. W., Bahnson H. T. The use of expanded microporous polytetrafluoroethylene for limb salvage: a preliminary report. Surgery. 1976 May;79(5):485–491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell C. D., Goldfarb D., Roe R. A small arterial substitute: expanded microporous polytetrafluoroethylene: patency versus porosity. Ann Surg. 1975 Aug;182(2):138–143. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197508000-00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Florian A., Cohn L. H., Dammin G. J., Collins J. J., Jr Small vessel replacement with gore-tex (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene). Arch Surg. 1976 Mar;111(3):267–270. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1976.01360210061011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson J. M., Goldfarb D., Baker L. D., Jr Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene as a small artery replacement. A preliminary report. Am J Surg. 1976 Dec;132(6):723–727. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(76)90444-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Matsumoto H., Hasegawa T., Fuse K., Yamamoto M., Saigusa M. A new vascular prosthesis for a small caliber artery. Surgery. 1973 Oct;74(4):519–523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sauvage L. R., Berger K. E., Mansfield P. B., Wood S. J., Smith J. C., Overton J. B. Future directions in the development of arterial prostheses for small and medium caliber arteries. Surg Clin North Am. 1974 Feb;54(1):213–228. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)40245-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Soyer T., Lempinen M., Cooper P., Norton L., Eiseman B. A new venous prosthesis. Surgery. 1972 Dec;72(6):864–872. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES