Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1979 Jun;189(6):691–698. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197906000-00004

Prophylactic and Preventive Antibiotic Therapy: Timing, Duration and Economics

H Harlan Stone, Bonnie B Haney, Laura D Kolb, Carol E Geheber, C Ann Hooper
PMCID: PMC1397224  PMID: 378140

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that administered antibiotics must be active against major anticipated pathogens and must have reached sufficient concentrations in the tissue or body fluid at risk by the time of bacterial challenge if prophylactic therapy is to be maximally effective in reducing the infection rate of potentially contaminated surgery. The need for continuing antibiotic prophylaxis beyond the day of operation, however, has been uncertain. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of 220 patients undergoing elective gastric, biliary or colonic surgery, perioperative administration of cefamandole plus five days of placebo was compared to perioperative plus five days of postoperative antibiotic therapy; no significant difference was found between the groups in the rate of infection of wound (6 and 5%, respectively), peritoneum (2% each) and elsewhere (6% and 5%). In another prospective, randomized, nonblind study of 451 determinant cases of 1,624 patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, cephalothin was instituted preoperatively but after peritoneal contamination had occurred (i.e., abdominal trauma, etc.); continued postoperative antibiotic again failed to reduce further the wound and peritoneal infection rates, as noted on comparing perioperative therapy alone (infection rates 8 and 4%, respectively) with perioperative plus 5-7 days of postoperative treatment (10% and 5%, respectively). Analysis of these data, as well as of the extra expenses incurred by 463 patients because of infection in a previous prophylactic antibiotic study, revealed an average additional expenditure of $2,686.00 for each instance of postoperative infection of the wound and/or peritoneum; whereas savings of $300.00 per patient at risk were obtained whenever appropriate prophylactic antibiotic had been given.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALTEMEIER W. A., CULBERTSON W. R., VETO M. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy. AMA Arch Surg. 1955 Jul;71(1):2–6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1955.01270130004002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauer A. W., Kirby W. M., Sherris J. C., Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Apr;45(4):493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burke J. F. The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery. 1961 Jul;50:161–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chetlin S. H., Elliott D. W. Preoperative antibiotics in biliary surgery. Arch Surg. 1973 Aug;107(2):319–323. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1973.01350200179037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cruse P. J., Foord R. A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds. Arch Surg. 1973 Aug;107(2):206–210. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1973.01350200078018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kaiser A. B., Clayson K. R., Mulherin J. L., Jr, Roach A. C., Allen T. R., Edwards W. H., Dale W. A. Antibiotic prophylaxis in vascular surgery. Ann Surg. 1978 Sep;188(3):283–289. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197809000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MILES A. A., MILES E. M., BURKE J. The value and duration of defence reactions of the skin to the primary lodgement of bacteria. Br J Exp Pathol. 1957 Feb;38(1):79–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Polk H. C., Jr, Lopez-Mayor J. F. Postoperative wound infection: a prospective study of determinant factors and prevention. Surgery. 1969 Jul;66(1):97–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ratzan K. R., Baker H. B., Lauredo I. Excretion of cefamandole, cefazolin, and cephalothin into T-tube bile. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Jun;13(6):985–987. doi: 10.1128/aac.13.6.985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stone H. H. Gastric surgery. South Med J. 1977 Oct;70 (Suppl 1):35–37. doi: 10.1097/00007611-197710001-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stone H. H., Hester T. R., Jr Incisional and peritoneal infection after emergency celiotomy. Ann Surg. 1973 Jun;177(6):669–678. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197306000-00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stone H. H., Hooper C. A., Kolb L. D., Geheber C. E., Dawkins E. J. Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastric, biliary and colonic surgery. Ann Surg. 1976 Oct;184(4):443–452. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197610000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stone H. H., Kolb L. D. The evolution and spread of gentamicin-resistant Pseudomonads. J Trauma. 1971 Jul;11(7):586–589. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197107000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Strachan C. J., Black J., Powis S. J., Waterworth T. A., Wise R., Wilkinson A. R., Burdon D. W., Severn M., Mitra B., Norcott H. Prophylactic use of cephazolin against wound sepsis after cholecystectomy. Br Med J. 1977 May 14;1(6071):1254–1256. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6071.1254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES