Skip to main content
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
. 1985;20(Suppl 1):62S–66S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1985.tb05144.x

Vasodilatory effect of nicardipine and verapamil in the forearm of hypertensive as compared with normotensive man

U L Hulthén, P Bolli, F R Bühler
PMCID: PMC1400786  PMID: 3896282

Abstract

1 The intent of this study was to determine whether or not increased calcium-influx-mediated vasoconstriction is a primary pathogenetic disturbance in essential hypertension.

2 Ten normotensive subjects (NT) (aged 45 ± 12 years) and 23 patients with essential hypertension (EH) were studied. Twelve of the patients (aged 42 ± 12 years) were classified as having mild EH and 11 patients (aged 49 ± 11 years) as having moderate EH.

3 Forearm blood flow and intra-arterial blood pressure were measured. Forearm vascular resistance (FVR) was calculated under basal conditions, during reperfusion following 10 min arterial occlusion, and after infusion into the brachial artery of sodium nitroprusside (0.15 and 0.6 μg min-1 100 ml-1 tissue for 2 min each) and the calcium-influx inhibitors nicardipine (5 and 40 μg min-1 100 ml-1 tissue for 1 min each) and verapamil (80 μg min-1 100 ml-1 tissue for 1 min).

4 FVR after 10 min arterial occlusion was lower in mild EH than in moderate EH and still lower in NT. FVR was comparable in the three groups following infusion of maximal doses of sodium nitroprusside, nicardipine, and verapamil.

5 To allow for the vasodilator response to arterial occlusion, the decrease in FVR measured after each drug was divided by that obtained after arterial occlusion in each individual. The adjusted vasodilator response to nicardipine and verapamil, but not to sodium nitroprusside, was greater in moderate EH than in NT and mild EH. In the latter two groups the adjusted vasodilator responses were comparable.

6 Calcium-influx mediated vasoconstriction is thus enhanced in moderate (established) EH but not in mild EH and, therefore, is unlikely as a primary pathogenetic disturbance in essential hypertension.

Keywords: hypertension, nicardipine, vasodilatation, verapamil

Full text

PDF
62S

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CONWAY J. A vascular abnormality in hypertension. A study of blood flow in the forearm. Circulation. 1963 Apr;27(4 Pt 1):520–529. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.27.4.520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Da Prada M., Zürcher Simultaneous radioenzymatic determination of plasma and tissue adrenaline, noradrenaline and dopamine within the femtomole range. Life Sci. 1976 Oct 15;19(8):1161–1174. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(76)90251-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FOLKOW B., GRIMBY G., THULESIUS O. Adaptive structural changes of the vascular walls in hypertension and their relation to the control of the peripheral resistance. Acta Physiol Scand. 1958 Dec 15;44(3-4):255–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1958.tb01626.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hulthén U. L., Bolli P., Amann F. W., Kiowski W., Bühler F. R. Enhanced vasodilatation in essential hypertension by calcium channel blockade with verapamil. Hypertension. 1982 May-Jun;4(3 Pt 2):26–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hulthén U. L., Bolli P., Bühler F. R. Calcium influx mediated vasoconstriction: studies in patients with mild and moderate essential hypertension. J Hypertens Suppl. 1983 Dec;1(2):105–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mikkelsen E., Andersson K. E., Lederballe Pedersen O. Verapamil and nifedipine inhibition of contractions induced by potassium and noradrenaline in human mesenteric arteries and veins. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh) 1979 Feb;44(2):110–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1979.tb02304.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mikkelsen E., Andersson K. E., Pedersen O. L. The effect of nifedipine on isolated human peripheral vessels. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh) 1978 Oct;43(4):291–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1978.tb02268.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. PATTERSON G. C., WHELAN R. F. Reactive hyperaemia in the human forearm. Clin Sci. 1955 May;14(2):197–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Robinson B. F., Collier J. G., Dobbs R. J. Comparative dilator effect of verapamil and sodium nitroprusside in forearm arterial bed and dorsal hand veins in man: functional differences between vascular smooth muscle in arterioles and veins. Cardiovasc Res. 1979 Jan;13(1):16–21. doi: 10.1093/cvr/13.1.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Robinson B. F., Dobbs R. J., Bayley S. Response of forearm resistance vessels to verapamil and sodium nitroprusside in normotensive and hypertensive men: evidence for a functional abnormality of vascular smooth muscle in primary hypertension. Clin Sci (Lond) 1982 Jul;63(1):33–42. doi: 10.1042/cs0630033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Robinson B. F., Dobbs R. J., Kelsey C. R. Effects of nifedipine on resistance vessels, arteries and veins in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1980 Nov;10(5):433–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb01784.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sealey J. E., Gerten-Banes J., Laragh J. H. The renin system: Variations in man measured by radioimmunoassay or bioassay. Kidney Int. 1972 Apr;1(4):240–253. doi: 10.1038/ki.1972.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Takeshita A., Mark A. L. Decreased vasodilator capacity of forearm resistance vessels in borderline hypertension. Hypertension. 1980 Sep-Oct;2(5):610–616. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.2.5.610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES