Skip to main content
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
. 1982;13(Suppl 1):59S–63S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1982.tb01890.x

Labetalol in general practice

A review

J A Kane
PMCID: PMC1401839  PMID: 7093101

Abstract

1 The results of the treatment of 8573 hypertensive patients with labetalol in general practice, for periods between 1 month and 5 yr, are reviewed.

2 The data reviewed were obtained from the published literature together with our own published (Kane et al., 1976; Kane et al., 1979) and more recent (unpublished) work.

3 Between 60% and 80% of severe (diastolic blood pressure > 120 mmHg) and previously uncontrolled hypertensives responded satisfactorily to the drug, as did up to 88% of mild to moderate hypertensives.

4 The anti-hypertensive effect of labetalol was not dependent on the frequency of administration, twice and three times daily treatment regimes being equally effective.

5 The withdrawal rate attributable to side-effects was between 6% and 13%. Tiredness, dizziness, headache and upper gastro-intestinal symptoms were the four principal side-effects, but they were usually transient when labetalol treatment was continued.

6 No drug interactions or adverse haematological or biochemical changes were seen.

Full text

PDF
59S

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Douglas-Jones A. P. Labetalol in inadequately controlled hypertensive patients. A twice-daily oral regimen. Practitioner. 1980 Aug;224(1346):841–844. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Forsell P., O'Sullivan J., Carson N. Labetalol in the treatment of hypertension in general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 1979 Nov;8(11):1165–1166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gomez G., Phillips L. A. Labetalol ('trandate') in hypertension: a multicentre study in general practice. Curr Med Res Opin. 1980;6(10):677–684. doi: 10.1185/03007998009110080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Harris C. Labetalol in the difficult hypertensive patient in general practice. Curr Med Res Opin. 1978;5(8):618–624. doi: 10.1185/03007997809110197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kane J., Gregg I., Stephens M. D. A long-term study of labetalol in general practice. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979;8(Suppl 2):167S–170S. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Manderson W. S. A new alpha and beta receptor antagonist in general practice. Practitioner. 1979 Jan;222(1327):131–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tuomilehto J., Nissinen A., Elo J. Experience with labetalol in essential hypertension. Curr Med Res Opin. 1980;6(6):407–415. doi: 10.1185/03007998009109460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wilcox R. G. Randomised study of six beta-blockers and a thiazide diuretic in essential hypertension. Br Med J. 1978 Aug 5;2(6134):383–385. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6134.383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES