Skip to main content
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
. 1982;13(Suppl 2):269S–278S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1982.tb01924.x

Effects of β-adrenoceptor antagonists on central haemodynamics in essential hypertension

Hisaichiro Tsukiyama, Keiko Otsuka, Kikuhiko Higuma
PMCID: PMC1402149  PMID: 6125176

Abstract

1 Eleven β-adrenoceptor blocking agents (propranolol, oxprenolol, penbutolol, carteolol, bupranolol, bufetolol, pindolol, atenolol, metoprolol, acebutolol and labetalol) were orally administered to 144 patients with essential hypertension for 5 weeks to assess their antihypertensive effects. In addition haemodynamic responses were measured non-invasively using radioactive iodinated human serum albumin.

2 In a second study central haemodynamic changes in response to intravenous injection of propranolol (0.4 mg/kg) were assessed in 21 untreated patients with essential hypertension and compared with those induced by short-time therapy with propranolol, acebutolol or pindolol.

3 During short term (5 weeks) oral therapy all the antagonists with the exception of pindolol and carteolol, showed a tendency to reduce heart rate. The effects on blood pressure were not uniform and for each drug a subgroup of responders (defined as those showing 10 mmHg or more reduction of mean arterial blood pressure) was separately analysed.

4 The responders to antihypertensive therapy showed a wide spectrum of haemodynamic responses. The results would be compatible with the hypothesis that in addition to the reduction in cardiac output, the β-adrenoceptor blockers lower blood pressure by at least one, as yet unknown, mechanism leading to a reduction in total peripheral resistance.

5 The antagonists tested demonstrate a variety of ancillary properties and some differences were apparent between the haemodynamic responses to the different drugs. Cardioselective β-adrenoceptor blockers caused a significant decrease in cardiac index; however no significant change in total peripheral resistance was observed. These effects may be attributable to their weak vascular β-adrenoceptor blockade.

6 In the case of labetalol the additional α-adrenoceptor blocking activity of the drug was reflected by a fall in total peripheral resistance resulting from blockade of the vasoconstrictor effects of neuronal noradrenaline.

7 Pindolol, because of its pronounced ISA, showed qualitative differences from the other antagonists, its antihypertensive effects being accompanied by significant falls of total peripheral resistance and increases in cardiac output.

8 During short term (5 weeks) oral therapy with propranolol, acebutolol or pindolol no marked central haemodynamic changes occurred and in particular, no significant increase in cardiopulmonary blood volume was detected.

Full text

PDF
269S

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adler-Graschinsky E., Langer S. Z. Possible role of a beta-adrenoceptor in the regulation of noradrenaline release by nerve stimulation through a positive feed-back mechanism. Br J Pharmacol. 1975 Jan;53(1):43–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1975.tb07328.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkins J. M., Mitchell H. C., Pettinger W. A. Increased pulmonary vascular resistance with systemic hypertension. Effect of minoxidil and other antihypertensive agents. Am J Cardiol. 1977 May 26;39(6):802–807. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(77)80030-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Atterhög J. H., Dunér H., Pernow B. Experience with pindolol, a betareceptor blocker, in the treatment of hypertension. Am J Med. 1976 May 31;60(6):872–876. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(76)90907-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brittain R. T., Levy G. P. A review of the animal pharmacology of labetalol, a combined alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor-blocking drug. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1976 Aug;3(4 Suppl 3):681–684. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goto K., Hirano A., Hirakawa S. Non-invasive estimation of the human pulmonary blood volume with gamma camera and RI-angiocardiography. Jpn Circ J. 1981 Jan;45(1):113–119. doi: 10.1253/jcj.45.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. London G. M., Safar M. E., Weiss Y. A., Simon C. A. Total effective compliance of the vascular bed in essential hypertension. Am Heart J. 1978 Mar;95(3):325–330. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(78)90363-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mitzner W., Goldberg H., Lichtenstein S. Effect of thoracic blood volume changes on steady state cardiac output. Circ Res. 1976 Apr;38(4):255–261. doi: 10.1161/01.res.38.4.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. PRICHARD B. N., GILLAM P. M. USE OF PROPRANOLOL (INDERAL) IN TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION. Br Med J. 1964 Sep 19;2(5411):725–727. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5411.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tarazi R. C., Dustan H. P. Beta adrenergic blockade in hypertension. Practical and theoretical implications of long-term hemodynamic variations. Am J Cardiol. 1972 May;29(5):633–640. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(72)90164-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Weinberger M. H., Aoi W., Henry D. P. Direct effect of beta-adrenergic stimulation on renin release by the rat kidney slice in vitro. Circ Res. 1975 Sep;37(3):318–324. doi: 10.1161/01.res.37.3.318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES