Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 1994 Jul-Aug;109(4):472–477.

Money for guns: evaluation of the Seattle Gun Buy-Back Program.

C M Callahan 1, F P Rivara 1, T D Koepsell 1
PMCID: PMC1403522  PMID: 8041845

Abstract

Community involvement in local firearms policy is advocated to be an important component of efforts to curtail violence. This report describes the first evaluation of one such effort, a gun buy-back program conducted in Seattle, WA, during the fall of 1992. The evaluation included (a) surveys of 500 participants and a description of the firearms exchanged; (b) monitoring police reports, trauma center admissions, and medical examiners' data to assess short-term effects on the frequency of firearm-related events; and (c) an assessment of community beliefs by random-digit dialing telephone interviews of 1,000 residents. Of the 1,172 firearms relinquished, 95 percent were handguns, 83 percent were operational, and 67 percent were owned for more than 5 years. Twenty-five percent were exchanged by women. The mean age of participants in the exchange program was 51 years. Females and persons in older age groups were more likely than males (83 percent versus 70 percent, P < 0.01) and minors (88 percent versus 55 percent, P < 0.05) to select safe disposal as motivation to participate. Comparing firearm-related events per month before and after the program, crimes and deaths increased, and injuries decreased, but the changes were not statistically significant. Telephone interviews revealed broad support for publicly funded gun buy-back programs even among households (61 percent) with firearms. Gun buy-back programs are a broadly supported means to decrease voluntarily the prevalence of handguns within a community, but their effect on decreasing violent crime and reducing firearm mortality is unknown.

Full text

PDF
472

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boyd J. H., Mościcki E. K. Firearms and youth suicide. Am J Public Health. 1986 Oct;76(10):1240–1242. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.10.1240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brent D. A., Perper J. A., Allman C. J., Moritz G. M., Wartella M. E., Zelenak J. P. The presence and accessibility of firearms in the homes of adolescent suicides. A case-control study. JAMA. 1991 Dec 4;266(21):2989–2995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Callahan C. M., Rivara F. P. Urban high school youth and handguns. A school-based survey. JAMA. 1992 Jun 10;267(22):3038–3042. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chapdelaine A., Samson E., Kimberley M. D., Viau L. Firearm-related injuries in Canada: issues for prevention. CMAJ. 1991 Nov 15;145(10):1217–1223. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hartge P., Brinton L. A., Rosenthal J. F., Cahill J. I., Hoover R. N., Waksberg J. Random digit dialing in selecting a population-based control group. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Dec;120(6):825–833. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kassirer J. P. Firearms and the killing threshold. N Engl J Med. 1991 Dec 5;325(23):1647–1650. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199112053252311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kellermann A. L., Lee R. K., Mercy J. A., Banton J. The epidemiologic basis for the prevention of firearm injuries. Annu Rev Public Health. 1991;12:17–40. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.12.050191.000313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kellermann A. L., Reay D. T. Protection or peril? An analysis of firearm-related deaths in the home. N Engl J Med. 1986 Jun 12;314(24):1557–1560. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198606123142406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Loftin C., McDowall D., Wiersema B., Cottey T. J. Effects of restrictive licensing of handguns on homicide and suicide in the District of Columbia. N Engl J Med. 1991 Dec 5;325(23):1615–1620. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199112053252305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Martin M. J., Hunt T. K., Hulley S. B. The cost of hospitalization for firearm injuries. JAMA. 1988 Nov 25;260(20):3048–3050. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. O'Carroll P. W., Loftin C., Waller J. B., Jr, McDowall D., Bukoff A., Scott R. O., Mercy J. A., Wiersema B. Preventing homicide: an evaluation of the efficacy of a Detroit gun ordinance. Am J Public Health. 1991 May;81(5):576–581. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.5.576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ropp L., Visintainer P., Uman J., Treloar D. Death in the city. An American childhood tragedy. JAMA. 1992 Jun 3;267(21):2905–2910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sloan J. H., Kellermann A. L., Reay D. T., Ferris J. A., Koepsell T., Rivara F. P., Rice C., Gray L., LoGerfo J. Handgun regulations, crime, assaults, and homicide. A tale of two cities. N Engl J Med. 1988 Nov 10;319(19):1256–1262. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198811103191905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sloan J. H., Rivara F. P., Reay D. T., Ferris J. A., Kellermann A. L. Firearm regulations and rates of suicide. A comparison of two metropolitan areas. N Engl J Med. 1990 Feb 8;322(6):369–373. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199002083220605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Teret S. P., Alexander G. R., Bailey L. A. The passage of Maryland's gun law: data and advocacy for injury prevention. J Public Health Policy. 1990 Spring;11(1):26–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wintemute G. J. Firearms as a cause of death in the United States, 1920-1982. J Trauma. 1987 May;27(5):532–536. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198705000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES