Skip to main content
PMC home page
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 1994 Jul-Aug;109(4):507–511.

Factors influencing the return rate in a direct mail campaign to inform minority women about prevention of cervical cancer.

M B Dignan 1, R Michielutte 1, D D Jones-Lighty 1, J Bahnson 1
PMCID: PMC1403527  PMID: 8041850

Abstract

The Forsyth County Cervical Cancer Prevention Project was a 5-year community-based health education program funded by the National Cancer Institute. The program was developed to reduce cervical cancer mortality among black women in Forsyth County, and it was targeted to those ages 18 and older. The program tried to educate the target population through a combination of mass media and direct education. This paper reports on an experiment conducted to investigate sources of influence on the effectiveness of direct mail, a technique used to augment mass media health education. Direct mail has shown promise as a method for reaching target populations that are difficult to reach with other mass media approaches. Using commercially prepared mailing lists sorted by zip code and other characteristics of the resident, health-related materials can be targeted to persons at their homes. A randomized experiment involving 1,000 households was carried out to estimate the influence of type of postage and address (name versus "resident or occupant") on the response rate to direct mail. Results indicated that there was no significant advantage from use of first class over bulk rate postage, but the return was significantly greater when the envelope bore a name rather than "resident or occupant."

Full text

PDF
507

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dignan M. B., Michielutte R., Sharp P. C., Young L. D., Daniels L. A. Use of process evaluation to guide health education in Forsyth County's project to prevent cervical cancer. Public Health Rep. 1991 Jan-Feb;106(1):73–77. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dignan M., Bahnson J., Sharp P., Beal P., Smith M., Michielutte R. Implementation of mass media community health education: the Forsyth County Cervical Cancer Prevention Project. Health Educ Res. 1991 Sep;6(3):259–266. doi: 10.1093/her/6.3.259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dignan M., Michielutte R., Sharp P., Bahnson J., Young L., Beal P. The role of focus groups in health education for cervical cancer among minority women. J Community Health. 1990 Dec;15(6):369–375. doi: 10.1007/BF01324299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gillespie A. H., Yarbrough J. P., Roderuck C. E. Nutrition communication program: a direct mail approach. J Am Diet Assoc. 1983 Mar;82(3):254–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Green L. W. Evaluation and measurement: some dilemmas for health education. Am J Public Health. 1977 Feb;67(2):155–161. doi: 10.2105/ajph.67.2.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Murray D. M., Kurth C. L., Finnegan J. R., Jr, Pirie P. L., Admire J. B., Luepker R. V. Direct mail as a prompt for follow-up care among persons at risk for hypertension. Am J Prev Med. 1988 Nov-Dec;4(6):331–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schmid T. L., Jeffery R. W., Hellerstedt W. L. Direct mail recruitment to home-based smoking and weight control programs: a comparison of strategies. Prev Med. 1989 Jul;18(4):503–517. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(89)90009-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES