Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 1994 Jul-Aug;109(4):571–578.

Evaluation of Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound's Senior Influenza Immunization Program.

D C Pearson 1, R S Thompson 1
PMCID: PMC1403537  PMID: 8041859

Abstract

The goal of this study was to identify areas in which an influenza immunization campaign for seniors, sponsored by a health maintenance organization (HMO), could be improved. This study was conducted at Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound (GHC), serving approximately 470,000 enrollees in Washington State. A survey was administered to two groups of seniors drawn at random--those who received influenza vaccine and those who did not, during the fall and winter of 1991. Immunization rates were almost 75 percent for "well" seniors and 85 percent for "chronically ill" seniors. Bivariant analysis showed that two activities of the influenza campaign were associated with vaccine compliance: a provider-generated recruitment letter and exposure to an immunization article in the enrollee newsletter. Using a broader framework for predicting vaccine compliance, logistic regression showed that vaccine compliance was associated positively with previous immunizations and belief that "my doctor wants me to get a shot," and negatively with fear of adverse reaction and belief that the vaccine is ineffective. There were few suggestions for improving the immunization program, among both vaccinated and unvaccinated enrollees. Approximately two-thirds of unvaccinated enrollees said there was nothing GHC could do to convince them to be vaccinated. These findings suggest high vaccine compliance and satisfaction with an HMO-sponsored influenza campaign. Strategies and potential to further increase vaccination rates are discussed.

Full text

PDF
571

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buchner D. M., Larson E. B., White R. F. Influenza vaccination in community elderly. A controlled trial of postcard reminders. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1987 Aug;35(8):755–760. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1987.tb06354.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carter W. B., Beach L. R., Inui T. S., Kirscht J. P., Prodzinski J. C. Developing and testing a decision model for predicting influenza vaccination compliance. Health Serv Res. 1986 Feb;20(6 Pt 2):897–932. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frank J. W., Henderson M., McMurray L. Influenza vaccination in the elderly: 1. Determinants of acceptance. Can Med Assoc J. 1985 Feb 15;132(4):371–375. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hutchison B. G. Effect of computer-generated nurse/physician reminders on influenza immunization among seniors. Fam Med. 1989 Nov-Dec;21(6):433–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Larson E. B., Bergman J., Heidrich F., Alvin B. L., Schneeweiss R. Do postcard reminders improve influenza compliance? A prospective trial of different postcard "cues". Med Care. 1982 Jun;20(6):639–648. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198206000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Larson E. B., Olsen E., Cole W., Shortell S. The relationship of health beliefs and a postcard reminder to influenza vaccination. J Fam Pract. 1979 Jun;8(6):1207–1211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McDonald C. J., Hui S. L., Smith D. M., Tierney W. M., Cohen S. J., Weinberger M., McCabe G. P. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1984 Jan;100(1):130–138. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-100-1-130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mullooly J. P. Increasing influenza vaccination among high-risk elderly: a randomized controlled trial of a mail cue in an HMO setting. Am J Public Health. 1987 May;77(5):626–627. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.5.626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nichol K. L., Lofgren R. P., Gapinski J. Influenza vaccination. Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior among high-risk outpatients. Arch Intern Med. 1992 Jan;152(1):106–110. doi: 10.1001/archinte.152.1.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pommerenke F. A., Dietrich A. Improving and maintaining preventive services, Part 2: Practical principles for primary care. J Fam Pract. 1992 Jan;34(1):92–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Williams W. W., Hickson M. A., Kane M. A., Kendal A. P., Spika J. S., Hinman A. R. Immunization policies and vaccine coverage among adults. The risk for missed opportunities. Ann Intern Med. 1988 Apr;108(4):616–625. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-4-616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES