Skip to main content
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 1992 Jan-Feb;107(1):60–65.

Factors associated with rates of participation in WIC by eligible pregnant women.

L R Kahler 1, R M O'Shea 1, L C Duffy 1, G M Buck 1
PMCID: PMC1403602  PMID: 1738810

Abstract

The relationship between sociodemographic, biological, and prenatal care characteristics, and participation rates of pregnant women in the Special Supplemental Food Program For Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) was studied by interviewing 200 postpartum patients in a Buffalo, NY, hospital between October 1988 and January 1989. Among the 136 women eligible for the program, 94 (69 percent) participated during their index pregnancies. WIC participation was found to be highly associated with source of prenatal care and having made more frequent prenatal visits. WIC was related to having fewer children and earlier initiation of prenatal care. Multivariate analysis showed that program participation remained highly associated with the source of prenatal care and the number of prenatal visits, when combined with other factors considered, such as age, education, marital status, number of living children, and timing of initial prenatal visit. The results suggest the need for a WIC enrollment effort directed to providers of prenatal care, who would be urged to encourage women to seek early and adequate prenatal care through the program.

Full text

PDF
60

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Kennedy E. T., Gershoff S. Effect of WIC supplemental feeding on hemoglobin and hematocrit of prenatal patients. J Am Diet Assoc. 1982 Mar;80(3):227–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kennedy E. T., Gershoff S., Reed R., Austin J. E. Evaluation of the effect of WIC supplemental feeding on birth weight. J Am Diet Assoc. 1982 Mar;80(3):220–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kotelchuck M., Schwartz J. B., Anderka M. T., Finison K. S. WIC participation and pregnancy outcomes: Massachusetts Statewide Evaluation Project. Am J Public Health. 1984 Oct;74(10):1086–1092. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.10.1086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ku L. Factors influencing early prenatal enrollment in the WIC program. Public Health Rep. 1989 May-Jun;104(3):301–306. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rush D., Alvir J. M., Kenny D. A., Johnson S. S., Horvitz D. G. The National WIC Evaluation: evaluation of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children. III. Historical study of pregnancy outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Aug;48(2 Suppl):412–428. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/48.2.412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schramm W. F. WIC prenatal participation and its relationship to newborn Medicaid costs in Missouri: a cost/benefit analysis. Am J Public Health. 1985 Aug;75(8):851–857. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.8.851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES