Skip to main content

. 1958 Apr;1(2):109–121. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-109

Probability Relations within Response Sequences under Ratio Reinforcement¹

Francis Mechner

PMCID: PMC1403928 PMID: 16811206

109

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

ANGER D. The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Sep;52(3):145–161. doi: 10.1037/h0041255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
DEWS P. B. Studies on behavior. I. Differential sensitivity to pentobarbital of pecking performance in pigeons depending on the schedule of reward. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1955 Apr;113(4):393–401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
HERRNSTEIN R. J., MORSE W. H. Selective action of pentobarbital on component behaviors of a reinforcement schedule. Science. 1956 Aug 24;124(3217):367–368. doi: 10.1126/science.124.3217.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
SIDMAN M., STEBBINS W. C. Satiation effects under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954 Apr;47(2):114–116. doi: 10.1037/h0054127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
SIDMAN M. Time discrimination and behavioral interaction in a free operant situation. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1956 Oct;49(5):469–473. doi: 10.1037/h0041892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
SKINNER B. F. Are theories of learning necessary? Psychol Rev. 1950 Jul;57(4):193–216. doi: 10.1037/h0054367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Schoenfeld W. N., Cumming W. W., Hearst E. ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1956 Aug;42(8):563–570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.42.8.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

ACTIONS

RESOURCES