Abstract
Three experiments are reported which investigated the effects of cost (point loss per response) upon human-observer responses maintained by VI and FI schedules of reinforcement (acquisition of points via critical-signal detections). (I) Cost attenuated VI response rates without substantially disturbing the constancy of responding, regardless of the presentation sequence of the no-cost and cost conditions. (II) FI scalloping appeared only under cost conditions. Under no cost, a constant rate of responding (similar to VI performance) characterized inter-reinforcement intervals. Exposure to cost did not prevent the recovery of previously established no-cost baselines. (III) FI irregularities, analogous to those commonly observed under FI reinforcement schedules, may be produced by different temporal presentations of the no-cost and cost conditions.
The results of all three experiments emphasize the importance of cost as a factor in the maintenance of human behavior on schedules of positive reinforcement.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/464bb/464bb3a58f5f77c207dc6ebea4119d86c7225e07" alt="201"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/baa1c/baa1ce0e6524340feea3d136539e318d6b8461fc" alt="202"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb8ee/cb8ee5f4087e1f402d23ee0d859a8f6ec23b567d" alt="203"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1c7e/f1c7e1c91a547eea6b1b2c629d260418d086487d" alt="204"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10eae/10eaefb1ca7e68eab9a8ddd248b32df94fa0aab7" alt="205"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b995/2b99576014082f8783f4756184eaad69084c2ac9" alt="206"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26bae/26bae2e81cee70950f1c738a893f2f70c477ad5f" alt="207"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/993e9/993e9bf93f40809cbcbeb5b1f2dc7916fa12d1df" alt="208"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- AZRIN N. H. Effects of punishment intensity during variable-interval reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Apr;3:123–142. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Azrin N. H. Some Effects of Noise on Human Behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Apr;1(2):183–200. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BLAIR W. C. Measurement of observing responses in human monitoring. Science. 1958 Aug 1;128(3318):255–256. doi: 10.1126/science.128.3318.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HOLLAND J. G. Human vigilance: the rate of observing an instrument is controlled by the schedule of signal detections. Science. 1958 Jul 11;128(3315):61–67. doi: 10.1126/science.128.3315.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HOLLAND J. G. Technique for behavioral analysis of human observing. Science. 1957 Feb 22;125(3243):348–350. doi: 10.1126/science.125.3243.348-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skinner B. F., Morse W. H. Fixed-interval reinforcement of running in a wheel. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Oct;1(4):371–379. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]